Arianrhod
Gold Member
- Jul 24, 2015
- 11,060
- 1,076
- 255
Which means you don't really agree with the rest of my post, eh?While I agree with the rest of your post, I don't see how preferential taxation could be considered the free market ...I've always thought that taxation should be allocated by taxpayer preference. I believe we'd be involved in far fewer wars, and the infrastructure in South Carolina would have been upgraded long before all that rainfall.
People allocating their money according to their preference isn't taxation. It's the free market. And you're right, if more money was allocated via taxpayer preference, and less via state mandate, there'd be far fewer wars and the things that matter most to us would get the most funding.
On the contrary. Let's establish that before I answer the rest.