Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack?

[Liberal]

Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows otherwise?


President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi - YouTube

He might have called it a terror attack, but he didn't blame it on terrorists... He blamed it on a video... Has it sunk in yet?

You got a link to Obama saying that the ambassador was killed directly because of the video?

 

[DiamondDave]

It is amazing that when shown the truth with the complete transcript, these brainwashed Obamabots still deny and deny and deny.. it is like a mental illness

 

[Liberal]

It is amazing that when shown the truth with the complete transcript, these brainwashed Obamabots still deny and deny and deny.. it is like a mental illness

We got video proof he said it, and transcripts of Susan Rice explaining the dynamics of the situation.. Never once saying that the video was a DIRECT cause of his death, but more of a parallel incident that may have even acted as a cover.

Is that not enough for you?

Should we build a time machine and travel back in time?

Maybe when we go back in time we can get Ryan and his crony House rats to NOT vote on cutting embassy spending too.

 

[tjvh]

Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows otherwise?


President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi - YouTube

He might have called it a terror attack, but he didn't blame it on terrorists... He blamed it on a video... Has it sunk in yet?

You got a link to Obama saying that the ambassador was killed directly because of the video?

His administration was blaming it on a video the very next day... The buck stops with Obama. The only link is that you might be the missing one.

 

[DiamondDave]

It is amazing that when shown the truth with the complete transcript, these brainwashed Obamabots still deny and deny and deny.. it is like a mental illness

We got video proof he said it, and transcripts of Susan Rice explaining the dynamics of the situation.. Never once saying that the video was a DIRECT cause of his death, but more of a parallel incident that may have even acted as a cover.

Is that not enough for you?

Should we build a time machine and travel back in time?

Maybe when we go back in time we can get Ryan and his crony House rats to NOT vote on cutting embassy spending too.

No.. you do not have video proof he said the attack was a terrorist attack, and that has been pointed out completely and thoroughly right in this thread...

I never said he directly said the video was to blame, but he and his administration sure made a point of associating it to the incident and apologizing for it

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows otherwise?


President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi - YouTube

He might have called it a terror attack, but he didn't blame it on terrorists... He blamed it on a video... Has it sunk in yet?

So when the president said, the day after,

"We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

...who was he blaming the attack on?

 

[francoHFW]

The dupes are absolutely bamboozled by by their lying heroes.

DUPES- Everyone knew it was an "act of terror" immediately . DUH! ADULTS wanted to know if it was TERRORISTS, not spontaneous protests like 30+ OTHER places where it was based on that STUPID RW video.
The real world does not have to keep up with your stupid RW propaganda machine.
Pubs and Pub politicians now appear to be run by your STUPID propaganda. A disgrace.

OP: Not stupid necessarily stupid, but definitely brainwashed. 3/4 of the forum are brainwashed dupes of the greedy rich. I will now vote A- stupid to see the results.

Of course oil production is up under Obama, and the lease number is irrelevant,

 

[NYcarbineer]

Only complete fucking idiot libs (which is not quite technically redundant) and other sub-cretins like Smugly DENY that the President did NOT call the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Because in opposite land (where the rabid right live) when the President says it was an Act of Terror it really means that the President didn't say it, right?

Except, of course, you scubag lying sack of shit, the Pressident absolutley did NOT call the attack in Benghazi a terrorist attack.

In fact he and his minions went out of their way to claim it was soemthing else.

Reality burns you, doesn't it, you fucking pig lying sack of stupid.

The President called it an act of terror on the 12th, and on the 13th.

Jay Carney, as whitehouse spokesman, called it a terrorist act on September 19th.

So shut up and quit making a fool of yourself.

 

[koshergrl]

Quote it please.

 

[jwoodie]

Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows otherwise?


President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi - YouTube

Nice editing job.

 

[Misty]

Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows otherwise?
President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi - YouTube

He might have called it a terror attack, but he didn't blame it on terrorists... He blamed it on a video... Has it sunk in yet?

So when the president said, the day after,
"We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

...who was he blaming the attack on?

Protesters. And what has been done btw? Nothing

 

[tjvh]

Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows otherwise?


President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi - YouTube

He might have called it a terror attack, but he didn't blame it on terrorists... He blamed it on a video... Has it sunk in yet?

So when the president said, the day after,

"We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

...who was he blaming the attack on?

A filmmaker. Because at the time he was apologizing for the video.

 

[Liberal]

No.. you do not have video proof he said the attack was a terrorist attack, and that has been pointed out completely and thoroughly right in this thread.

So.. That's is all you guys have left? We have whittled this all the way down to semantics of the phrase "Act of Terror"?

That.. Is what you guys are holding on to? Grabbing straws, or toothpicks at this point.

Here is some food for thought:

Terrorism [ter-uh-riz-uhm] : the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

----

Act: anything done, being done, or to be done; deed; performance

Of: used to indicate cause, motive, occasion, or reason.

Terror: violence or threats of violence used for intimidation or coercion; terrorism.


Semantics just got used against you there..

 

[NYcarbineer]

Because in opposite land (where the rabid right live) when the President says it was an Act of Terror it really means that the President didn't say it, right?

Except, of course, you scubag lying sack of shit, the Pressident absolutley did NOT call the attack in Benghazi a terrorist attack.

In fact he and his minions went out of their way to claim it was soemthing else.

Reality burns you, doesn't it, you fucking pig lying sack of stupid.

The President called it an act of terror on the 12th, and on the 13th.

Jay Carney, as whitehouse spokesman, called it a terrorist act on September 19th.

So shut up and quit making a fool of yourself.

Correction, it was the 20th.

You can read it right here:

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney en route Miami, FL, 9/20/2012 | The White House

Clear, unequivocal, indisputable proof that all you idiots are wrong to say the administration went 14 days before they called it a terrorist attack.

And proof Paul Ryan is a liar.

 

[NYcarbineer]

He might have called it a terror attack, but he didn't blame it on terrorists... He blamed it on a video... Has it sunk in yet?

So when the president said, the day after,

"We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

...who was he blaming the attack on?

A filmmaker. Because at the time he was apologizing for the video.

No, and no. Stop making a fool of yourself.

 

[koshergrl]

On page 4 and not one quote of Obama calling it a terrorist attack.

 

[Londoner]

The war on terror is not only a war, it is a political construct that, like the Cold War, allows the Right to govern and run on national security. Every Rightwing news source clobbers Obama for not protecting Americans against terror. They often re-write national security events to prove that Obama is weak. Their audience NEVER sees the actual facts and transcripts; therefore, Rightwing leadership can say whatever they want. On rare occasions, like debates, the Rightwing voter gets exposed to actual transcripts. You'd think this would cause them to re-evaluate their utter faith in Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.

It doesn't.

 

[tjvh]

So when the president said, the day after,

"We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

...who was he blaming the attack on?

A filmmaker. Because at the time he was apologizing for the video.

No, and no. Stop making a fool of yourself.

Stop trying to argue against those pesky things called facts.

 

[Wiseacre]

Where's the poll for voting on why Obama continued to push the video and "the mob got out of hand" fiction as the cause behind the attack? Long after everyone else knew it was a terrorist attack. Even though his own State Dept knew it immediately.

 

[Liberal]

Where's the poll for voting on why Obama continued to push the video and "the mob got out of hand" fiction as the cause behind the attack? Long after everyone else knew it was a terrorist attack. Even though his own State Dept knew it immediately.

This has already been addressed, go back to page 1 and read the entire thread.