Ravi
Diamond Member
I never supported any such law. Making up lies doesn't help your cause.Actually, you're wrong. If a person sells a firearm to a criminal, that person is no longer 'law abiding'. You see, we already have laws on the books about selling firearms to felons. If a criminal steals a firearm, that's hardly the fault of the legal owner. I suppose if someone doesn't put their car in a locked garage and it's stolen and used to harm another, we should punish the legal car owner? Patently ridiculous.
You keep making my point for me, that criminals will get firearms no matter what laws are put in place. Yet, you call for measures to "make it harder for criminals to obtain guns" when you know damn well that means law abiding citizens are put at a disadvantage while criminals get those firearms anyway.
So, yet one more time, why would you support laws that help the bad guys while restricting good guys from defending themselves and their families (children)?
If you like it better you can call them would be criminals. As far as I can tell, not one of the mass shooters in this country had a criminal record.
So you are on record for not taking measures to make it harder for criminals, and would be criminals, to obtain guns.
You are part of the problem.
Not at all. No one has asked me for my proposal.
But you first. You still haven't answered the question. You still haven't overcome the logical disconnect of more gun control laws that only restrict law abiding citizens ability to defend themselves. Why would you want to support such laws?