Why do whites call it hate when........

[Liability]

If whites would not have purchased Africans there would be no slaves in America, the African traders didn't transport Africans to AmeriKKa which means they are not the blame for what happened to blacks in America.

Idiotic.

You are "debating" a strawman. For I have not denied (and I don't see how anyone can rationally deny) that white slave traders bore responsibility for black slavery in America.

Plenty of blame and responsibility to go around.

Not the question though.

The question (to try to get you to focus on the thing you are flailing around desperately trying to evade) is that the "plenty of blame and responsibility to go around" thingie DOES entail that black African Slave Traders are part of he equation. And they are.

Black racists, like you, try to pretend that ONLY whites are responsible for the plight of the black slaves. But you are at least doubly fallacious in your reasoning. Your attempt to evade the clear logic that shows that black African slave traders were also (partly) responsible reveals you as dishonest and racist.

And your attempt to blame ANYBODY alive TODAY for the mistreatment of black American slaves (or for slavery in America itself) is beyond stupid, irrational and illogical. It, too, is a product of your vile racist thinking.

Too bad the Basshole is too irrational to permit his racism to be cured.

 

[The T]

No they did not have anything to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they weren't even aware of what was happening in America and anyways this has nothing to do with the thread, so Mr Bass is not going to argue this.


The topic question is whether pointing out the wrongs that whites have done to blacks consititute hate speech when in fact those wrongs are historical truths?

Again, your lie does not further your effort at debate.

Your false denial remains totally unpersuasive becvuase you found it necessary to evade the point. Wuss.

If they weren't here in the first place to BE mistreated, then they would not be mistreated. And if the black slave traders in Africa had not sold other blacks to the white slave traders, then the black slaves would not be here.

You lose.

If whites would not have brought blacks to America and if there was no slavery in America blacks wouuld not have been enslaved and mistreated, African traders didn't invent and run slavery in America. Whatever happened in America is totally the white man's doing.

And where do you stand on the present slave trade that continues? Somehow I do get the feeling that you have alot of guilt for something you, myself or anyone here on this board had ZERO to do with.

Many of us got over this a long time ago, and we still have to deal with it because some have some deep imbedded guilt-trip.

My advice to you? Get over it, and focus on the new-age slavery that rears it head in the form of this Republic being turned into a Marxist State at the expense of others.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

If whites would not have purchased Africans there would be no slaves in America, the African traders didn't transport Africans to AmeriKKa which means they are not the blame for what happened to blacks in America.

Idiotic.

You are "debating" a strawman. For I have not denied (and I don't see how anyone can rationally deny) that white slave traders bore responsibility for black slavery in America.

Plenty of blame and responsibility to go around.

Not the question though.

The question (to try to get you to focus on the thing you are flailing around desperately trying to evade) is that the "plenty of blame and responsibility to go around" thingie DOES entail that black African Slave Traders are part of he equation. And they are.

Black racists, like you, try to pretend that ONLY whites are responsible for the plight of the black slaves. But you are at least doubly fallacious in your reasoning. Your attempt to evade the clear logic that shows that black African slave traders were also (partly) responsible reveals you as dishonest and racist.

And your attempt to blame ANYBODY alive TODAY for the mistreatment of black American slaves (or for slavery in America itself) is beyond stupid, irrational and illogical. It, too, is a product of your vile racist thinking.

Too bad the Basshole is too irrational to permit his racism to be cured.

Black African traders are NOT responsible for what took place in AmeriKKa you jackass, what happened in AmeriKKa is solely to blame on the white man, not African traders who were selling POWs. If someone sold you a cat and you took it home and brutalized how the hell are the ones who sold you the cat are partly responsible for you brutalizing the cat?

 

[Luissa]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

who do you think sold the slaves to Europeans? I will give you a hint they were black and from africa.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

who do you think sold the slaves to Europeans? I will give you a hint they were black and from africa.

Black african are not reponsible for the treatment of enslaved Africans in America. The treatment of enslaved Africans in America is solely the doing of the white man, and who's more guilty, the one that sells people or he that purchases with intention to rape, brutalize, dismember, mutilate and oppress?

 

[dilloduck]

If whites would not have purchased Africans there would be no slaves in America, the African traders didn't transport Africans to AmeriKKa which means they are not the blame for what happened to blacks in America.

Idiotic.

You are "debating" a strawman. For I have not denied (and I don't see how anyone can rationally deny) that white slave traders bore responsibility for black slavery in America.

Plenty of blame and responsibility to go around.

Not the question though.

The question (to try to get you to focus on the thing you are flailing around desperately trying to evade) is that the "plenty of blame and responsibility to go around" thingie DOES entail that black African Slave Traders are part of he equation. And they are.

Black racists, like you, try to pretend that ONLY whites are responsible for the plight of the black slaves. But you are at least doubly fallacious in your reasoning. Your attempt to evade the clear logic that shows that black African slave traders were also (partly) responsible reveals you as dishonest and racist.

And your attempt to blame ANYBODY alive TODAY for the mistreatment of black American slaves (or for slavery in America itself) is beyond stupid, irrational and illogical. It, too, is a product of your vile racist thinking.

Too bad the Basshole is too irrational to permit his racism to be cured.

Black African traders are NOT responsible for what took place in AmeriKKa you jackass, what happened in AmeriKKa is solely to blame on the white man, not African traders who were selling POWs. If someone sold you a cat and you took it home and brutalized how the hell are the ones who sold you the cat are partly responsible for you brutalizing the cat?

simple--if you do not have access to something you cannot brutalize it. Were the black slave traders under the impression that the buyers were buying POWs in order to give them their freedom ?

 

[Liability]

If whites would not have purchased Africans there would be no slaves in America, the African traders didn't transport Africans to AmeriKKa which means they are not the blame for what happened to blacks in America.

Idiotic.

You are "debating" a strawman. For I have not denied (and I don't see how anyone can rationally deny) that white slave traders bore responsibility for black slavery in America.

Plenty of blame and responsibility to go around.

Not the question though.

The question (to try to get you to focus on the thing you are flailing around desperately trying to evade) is that the "plenty of blame and responsibility to go around" thingie DOES entail that black African Slave Traders are part of he equation. And they are.

Black racists, like you, try to pretend that ONLY whites are responsible for the plight of the black slaves. But you are at least doubly fallacious in your reasoning. Your attempt to evade the clear logic that shows that black African slave traders were also (partly) responsible reveals you as dishonest and racist.

And your attempt to blame ANYBODY alive TODAY for the mistreatment of black American slaves (or for slavery in America itself) is beyond stupid, irrational and illogical. It, too, is a product of your vile racist thinking.

Too bad the Basshole is too irrational to permit his racism to be cured.

Black African traders are NOT responsible for what took place in AmeriKKa you jackass, what happened in AmeriKKa is solely to blame on the white man, not African traders who were selling POWs. If someone sold you a cat and you took it home and brutalized how the hell are the ones who sold you the cat are partly responsible for you brutalizing the cat?

Since I have already refuted that lie you just repeated, which you couched in your typically racist way, it makes no sense for you to just reiterate your disproven position.

You fail you racist pig-dog.

Black African Slave Traders absolutely bear responsibility for what happend to the black African slaves they sold to the white slave traders who shipped the sold black African slaves over to America. The Black Slave traders bear responsibility. The White Slave Traders bear responsibility. Certainly the Slave owners bear responsibility. Perhaps the only folks at the time who didn't bear responsibility were the slaves themselves -- oh -- and all the other whites in America who had nothing to do wth slavery.

And despite your inclination to be a racist pig-dog like that retard Rev. Wright, the correct spelling of America contains NO letter "K."

 

[Luissa]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

who do you think sold the slaves to Europeans? I will give you a hint they were black and from africa.

Black african are not reponsible for the treatment of enslaved Africans in America. The treatment of enslaved Africans in America is solely the doing of the white man, and who's more guilty, the one that sells people or he that purchases with intention to rape, brutalize, dismember, mutilate and oppress?

they couldn't have done any of that if they never sold them to the europeans and americans.
And africans were enslaving their own people for generations

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Idiotic.

You are "debating" a strawman. For I have not denied (and I don't see how anyone can rationally deny) that white slave traders bore responsibility for black slavery in America.

Plenty of blame and responsibility to go around.

Not the question though.

The question (to try to get you to focus on the thing you are flailing around desperately trying to evade) is that the "plenty of blame and responsibility to go around" thingie DOES entail that black African Slave Traders are part of he equation. And they are.

Black racists, like you, try to pretend that ONLY whites are responsible for the plight of the black slaves. But you are at least doubly fallacious in your reasoning. Your attempt to evade the clear logic that shows that black African slave traders were also (partly) responsible reveals you as dishonest and racist.

And your attempt to blame ANYBODY alive TODAY for the mistreatment of black American slaves (or for slavery in America itself) is beyond stupid, irrational and illogical. It, too, is a product of your vile racist thinking.

Too bad the Basshole is too irrational to permit his racism to be cured.

Black African traders are NOT responsible for what took place in AmeriKKa you jackass, what happened in AmeriKKa is solely to blame on the white man, not African traders who were selling POWs. If someone sold you a cat and you took it home and brutalized how the hell are the ones who sold you the cat are partly responsible for you brutalizing the cat?

Since I have already refuted that lie you just repeated, which you couched in your typically racist way, it makes no sense for you to just reiterate your disproven position.

You fail you racist pig-dog.

Black African Slave Traders absolutely bear responsibility for what happend to the black African slaves they sold to the white slave traders who shipped the sold black African slaves over to America. The Black Slave traders bear rsponsibility. The White Slave Traders bear responsibility. Certainly the Slave owners bear responsibility. Perhaps the only folks at the time who didn't bear responsibility were the slaves themselves -- oh -- and all the other whites in America who had nothing to do wth slavery.

And despite your inclination to be a racist pig-dog like that retard Rev. Wright, the correct spelling of America contains NO letter "K."

You have provided no evidence that black traders are responsible for the white man's brutality of enslaved Africans in AmeriKKKa, they had no direct control or influence over what happened in AmeriKKKa as far as *TREATMENT* of enslaved Africans.Africans slave traders had a role in the slave trade, but not the treatment of the enslaved Africans themselves.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

who do you think sold the slaves to Europeans? I will give you a hint they were black and from africa.

Black african are not reponsible for the treatment of enslaved Africans in America. The treatment of enslaved Africans in America is solely the doing of the white man, and who's more guilty, the one that sells people or he that purchases with intention to rape, brutalize, dismember, mutilate and oppress?

they couldn't have done any of that if they never sold them to the europeans and americans.
And africans were enslaving their own people for generations

Whites bought the enslaved Africans and provided the rape, fathering of mixed bastard children, whipping and lyching, imposition of European names and stripping and denial of African culture. The African traders had nothing to do with that.


It is important to note that the Bass is dealing specifically with AmeriKKa not Africa, because Africans were not responsible for the cruel treatment of Afro-Americans during and after slavery, the American white man is. Don't blame Africans for thj vile actions of the AmeriKKan white man.

 

[dilloduck]

Black african are not reponsible for the treatment of enslaved Africans in America. The treatment of enslaved Africans in America is solely the doing of the white man, and who's more guilty, the one that sells people or he that purchases with intention to rape, brutalize, dismember, mutilate and oppress?

they couldn't have done any of that if they never sold them to the europeans and americans.
And africans were enslaving their own people for generations

Whites bought the enslaved Africans and provided the rape, fathering of mixed bastard children, whipping and lyching, imposition of European names and stripping and denial of African culture. The African traders had nothing to do with that.


It is important to note that the Bass is dealing specifically with AmeriKKa not Africa, because Africans were not responsible for the cruel treatment of Afro-Americans during and after slavery, the American white man is. Don't blame Africans for thj vile actions of the AmeriKKan white man.

The Bass is providing a classic example of how the black race in America has been hurt by rationalizations, excuses, and pity. Thank you, Bass.

 

[B94]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

To answer your question, to call the quote above hate speech or racist I believe would be wrong but since I’m sure this quote was taken not in it’s entirety and comes from a racist group that espouses anti-white sentiments I can understand why some white people might consider this type of statement from the Black Muslims hate speech. But I’m also sure many or most whites would agree that the quote above is true.

I would still like you to answer this -

1 - What do you call someone that only posts negative comments about another race?
2 - And why would someone do this?



.

 

[Bootneck]

Charlie Bass was looking around the market, he saw a copper watering can and thinks, “if I polish this dirty can I can sell it for several times more that I buy it for.” He haggles and gets a very good buy. Takes it back to his pad and starts to polish the can. A puff of smoke comes out of the can followed by a Genie. The Genie says, 'I can grant you three wishes but be careful they are very strong ones.” Charlie says 'I want to be white.” 'In a flash he is white. He say's “Man I never want to work again.” Flash and he is black again. “Hey man get it right this time listen, I want to be white and surrounded by pussy.” Genie turned him into a tampon.

 

[Luissa]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

To answer your question, to call the quote above hate speech or racist I believe would be wrong but since I’m sure this quote was taken not in it’s entirety and comes from a racist group that espouses anti-white sentiments I can understand why some white people might consider this type of statement from the Black Muslims hate speech. But I’m also sure many or most whites would agree that the quote above is true.

I would still like you to answer this -

1 - What do you call someone that only posts negative comments about another race?
2 - And why would someone do this?



.

you would call them a bigot.
and instead of moving on with his life, Charlie likes to blame the white man for all his problems.

 

[HUGGY]

Why does C-Bass call it hate when posters rightfully point out his racist actions, past and present?

Don't troll, answer the questions put forth, is it not a fact that those above mentioned acts truthfully did happen and still happen for some of them?

White people hate all bass. We hate the bassmatic...the talking wall hanging bass...The Bass... except the fat stupid neo con loving bass fisherman. They love the bass.

 

[Liability]

* * * *
You have provided no evidence that black traders are responsible for the white man's brutality of enslaved Africans in AmeriKKKa, they had no direct control or influence over what happened in AmeriKKKa as far as *TREATMENT* of enslaved Africans.Africans slave traders had a role in the slave trade, but not the treatment of the enslaved Africans themselves.

Untrue. Of course I provided evidence. You just choose to ignore it because you lack the intellectual ability to deal with it.

No surprise in that. You are an arrogant, ignorant stupid racist afterall.

AGAIN: the slaves GOT here because they were sold INTO slavery by black African Slave Traders. Thus, black African Slave Traders bear some of the responsibility.

You sticking your fingers in your wax-clotted ears and talking over the truth will not change it.

 

[RadiomanATL]

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

Precisely.

A false denial is still false.

Somebody needs to somehow get that information through the Basshole's thick racist skull.

No, you and RadiofagATL have it wrong because you haven't refuted the claim:


Fallacy: Personal Attack


A personal attack is committed when a person substitutes abusive remarks for evidence when attacking another person's claim or claims. This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because the attack is directed at the person making the claim and not the claim itself. The truth value of a claim is independent of the person making the claim. After all, no matter how repugnant an individual might be, he or she can still make true claims.

Not all ad Hominems are fallacious. In some cases, an individual's characteristics can have a bearing on the question of the veracity of her claims. For example, if someone is shown to be a pathological liar, then what he says can be considered to be unreliable. However, such attacks are weak, since even pathological liars might speak the truth on occasion.

Stop C-Bass, I'm not gay. quit sending me pics of yourself.

 

[HUGGY]

Precisely.

A false denial is still false.

Somebody needs to somehow get that information through the Basshole's thick racist skull.

No, you and RadiofagATL have it wrong because you haven't refuted the claim:


Fallacy: Personal Attack


A personal attack is committed when a person substitutes abusive remarks for evidence when attacking another person's claim or claims. This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because the attack is directed at the person making the claim and not the claim itself. The truth value of a claim is independent of the person making the claim. After all, no matter how repugnant an individual might be, he or she can still make true claims.

Not all ad Hominems are fallacious. In some cases, an individual's characteristics can have a bearing on the question of the veracity of her claims. For example, if someone is shown to be a pathological liar, then what he says can be considered to be unreliable. However, such attacks are weak, since even pathological liars might speak the truth on occasion.

Stop C-Bass, I'm not gay. quit sending me pics of yourself.

Woah!...seriously?

God I'm glad he don't have a crush on me!

 

[RadiomanATL]

No, you and RadiofagATL have it wrong because you haven't refuted the claim:


Fallacy: Personal Attack


A personal attack is committed when a person substitutes abusive remarks for evidence when attacking another person's claim or claims. This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because the attack is directed at the person making the claim and not the claim itself. The truth value of a claim is independent of the person making the claim. After all, no matter how repugnant an individual might be, he or she can still make true claims.

Not all ad Hominems are fallacious. In some cases, an individual's characteristics can have a bearing on the question of the veracity of her claims. For example, if someone is shown to be a pathological liar, then what he says can be considered to be unreliable. However, such attacks are weak, since even pathological liars might speak the truth on occasion.

Stop C-Bass, I'm not gay. quit sending me pics of yourself.

Woah!...seriously?

God I'm glad he don't have a crush on me!

Yeah, be grateful for small favors.

 

[HUGGY]

Why do whites call it hate when........ The Bass Just tryin to assert his point?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bw55sR4ec8]YouTube - Duke of Earl- Gene Chandler[/ame]