Why do whites call it hate when........

[Liability]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

Zzzzzz.

Why do black racists like the Basshole deny that their racism is racism?

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

Zzzzzz.

Why do black racists like the Basshole deny that their racism is racism?

Liabilitgay decides to make his daily Bass hating fall accusation that the Bass is racist without any proof of such.

 

[Liability]

Blacks rightfully point out the racist actions of whites, past and present? If truth is truth and it sets one free, why can't whites acknowledge the truth instead of accusing people of hate when the wrongs of whites are pointed out. Conversely, when whites point out the actions of non-whites, its never considered as hate and or racism.

Example, when Black Muslims state that the white enslaved the black man, rape black women during slavery, brainwashed blacks into believing they never had any history, denied and prevented enslaved Africans from speaking their language and outwardly practicing their culture, forcefully imposed European names upon the same people, denied the black people the right to vote, enacted social policies which pushed black people into ghettos, discriminated against black in employment and housing acquisition, used violence and intimidation against blacks to stop them from demanding equal rights, etc the Black Muslims are stating the truth because it is an undeniable fact that these have happened and some of these things still happen even today. Based on the above *FACTS* how can anyone call that hate speech and or being racist?

Zzzzzz.

Why do black racists like the Basshole deny that their racism is racism?

Liability decides to make his daily Bass hating fall accusation that the Bass is racist without any proof of such.

Fixed your typo, ya maggot.

And no. I make that accusation against you peridocically, not daily. And there is abundant proof of it.

The OP is more of the same.

You are a racist maggot. By the way, your being a black guy does not absolve you of your putrid racist spewings.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Zzzzzz.

Why do black racists like the Basshole deny that their racism is racism?

Liability decides to make his daily Bass hating fall accusation that the Bass is racist without any proof of such.

Fixed your typo, ya maggot.

And no. I make that accusation against you peridocically, not daily. And there is abundant proof of it.

The OP is more of the same.

You are a racist maggot. By the way, your being a black guy does not absolve you of your putrid racist spewings.

On drubbing by the Bass wasn't enough for you eh? You need to debate and reasoning practice first gay boy, looking at the yours posts is the equivalent of listening to a record skip and repeat itself. You don't really want to engage the Bass debate, you want to annoy, perhaps a taste of the ignore option will cure you of your rabid incessant obsession with the Bass.

 

[Liability]

Liability decides to make his daily Bass hating fall accusation that the Bass is racist without any proof of such.

Fixed your typo, ya maggot.

And no. I make that accusation against you peridocically, not daily. And there is abundant proof of it.

The OP is more of the same.

You are a racist maggot. By the way, your being a black guy does not absolve you of your putrid racist spewings.

On drubbing by the Bass wasn't enough for you eh? You need to debate and reasoning practice first gay boy, looking at the yours posts is the equivalent of listening to a record skip and repeat itself. You don't really want to engage the Bass debate, you want to annoy, perhaps a taste of the ignore option will cure you of your rabid incessant obsession with the Bass.

The Basshole is very self-delusional. Here's a simple word of truth for you, you homophobic self-loathing homosexual racist: you have never in your life been capable of giving anybody a drubbing.

The Basshole does not engage in debate and does not know how to do so. All your posts prove this time and time again.

You are a tiresome maggot.

And yes, you are indeed a vile racist pig. Very un-Christian of you, you lying maggot.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Strawman, you just refuse to acknowledge the truth that was stated. If your intent wasn't o address so called racists you should have never posted in this thread. You can keep calling the Bass a racist all you like, but its not making the statement truthful.

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

 

[Liability]

Strawman, you just refuse to acknowledge the truth that was stated. If your intent wasn't o address so called racists you should have never posted in this thread. You can keep calling the Bass a racist all you like, but its not making the statement truthful.

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

Precisely.

A false denial is still false.

Somebody needs to somehow get that information through the Basshole's thick racist skull.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Strawman, you just refuse to acknowledge the truth that was stated. If your intent wasn't o address so called racists you should have never posted in this thread. You can keep calling the Bass a racist all you like, but its not making the statement truthful.

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

So you're denying the truth by calling it racist? You're retard, none of what the Bass said was racist, all those things did happen and still happen today. You can refuse to acknowledge all you like, but truth is still truth.

 

[Bootneck]

Anyone for a game of..........

 

[RadiomanATL]

Strawman, you just refuse to acknowledge the truth that was stated. If your intent wasn't o address so called racists you should have never posted in this thread. You can keep calling the Bass a racist all you like, but its not making the statement truthful.

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

So you're denying the truth by calling it racist? You're retard, none of what the Bass said was racist, all those things did happen and still happen today. You can refuse to acknowledge all you like, but truth is still truth.

No. Fail times 2.

I'm denying your falsehoods because they are falsehoods.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Strawman, you just refuse to acknowledge the truth that was stated. If your intent wasn't o address so called racists you should have never posted in this thread. You can keep calling the Bass a racist all you like, but its not making the statement truthful.

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

Precisely.

A false denial is still false.

Somebody needs to somehow get that information through the Basshole's thick racist skull.

No, you and RadiofagATL have it wrong because you haven't refuted the claim:


Fallacy: Personal Attack


A personal attack is committed when a person substitutes abusive remarks for evidence when attacking another person's claim or claims. This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because the attack is directed at the person making the claim and not the claim itself. The truth value of a claim is independent of the person making the claim. After all, no matter how repugnant an individual might be, he or she can still make true claims.

Not all ad Hominems are fallacious. In some cases, an individual's characteristics can have a bearing on the question of the veracity of her claims. For example, if someone is shown to be a pathological liar, then what he says can be considered to be unreliable. However, such attacks are weak, since even pathological liars might speak the truth on occasion.

 

[Liability]

Strawman, you just refuse to acknowledge the truth that was stated. If your intent wasn't o address so called racists you should have never posted in this thread. You can keep calling the Bass a racist all you like, but its not making the statement truthful.

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

So you're denying the truth by calling it racist? You're retard, none of what the Bass said was racist, all those things did happen and still happen today. You can refuse to acknowledge all you like, but truth is still truth.

LOL.

How did "whites" acquire black people as slaves, exactly?

Oh yes. That's right. Something you conveniently omitted. Some blacks sold other blacks to white slave traders. Which puts black slave traders into that whole equation.

Why do you black racists refuse to accept any responsibility by blacks for the historic plight of black slavery?

 

[Bass v 2.0]

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

So you're denying the truth by calling it racist? You're retard, none of what the Bass said was racist, all those things did happen and still happen today. You can refuse to acknowledge all you like, but truth is still truth.

No. Fail times 2.

I'm denying your falsehoods because they are falsehoods.

So you're denying all those things happened in AmeriKKA? Even if you deny that still doesn't make them untrue.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

No. Fail.

I refuse to acknowledge your so called truth because it is racist, and therefore untrue by its very definition.

So you're denying the truth by calling it racist? You're retard, none of what the Bass said was racist, all those things did happen and still happen today. You can refuse to acknowledge all you like, but truth is still truth.

LOL.

How did "whites" acquire black people as slaves, exactly?

Oh yes. That's right. Something you conveniently omitted. Some blacks sold other blacks to white slave traders. Which puts black slave traders into that whole equation.

Why do you black racists refuse to accept any responsibility by blacks for the historic plight of black slavery?

Blacks in Africa had nothing to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they didn't create nor run the chattel slavery here in America, they didn't create and support Jim Crow. The actions of the Africans do not debunk nor refute what happened in AmeriKKa a far as racism, and discrimination.

 

[Liability]

So you're denying the truth by calling it racist? You're retard, none of what the Bass said was racist, all those things did happen and still happen today. You can refuse to acknowledge all you like, but truth is still truth.

No. Fail times 2.

I'm denying your falsehoods because they are falsehoods.

So you're denying all those things happened in AmeriKKA? Even if you deny that still doesn't make them untrue.

And you are now engaged in deliberate evasion.

There are certainly examples of white racism in the historical record and some white racism continues to this day.

But the "truth" we were discussing was YOUR racism. You falsely denied it. But it remains true. You are just a racist. And your LATEST idiotic putrid posts reaffirms that you are a racist.

Thanks for confirming the already clearly established.

 

[Liability]

So you're denying the truth by calling it racist? You're retard, none of what the Bass said was racist, all those things did happen and still happen today. You can refuse to acknowledge all you like, but truth is still truth.

LOL.

How did "whites" acquire black people as slaves, exactly?

Oh yes. That's right. Something you conveniently omitted. Some blacks sold other blacks to white slave traders. Which puts black slave traders into that whole equation.

Why do you black racists refuse to accept any responsibility by blacks for the historic plight of black slavery?

Blacks in Africa had nothing to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they didn't create nor run the chattel slavery here in America, they didn't create and support Jim Crow. The actions of the Africans do not debunk nor refute what happened in AmeriKKa a far as racism, and discrimination.

The black slave traders in Africa absolutely and undeniably (at least honestly undeniable) had a LOT to do with the treatment of black slaves in America. If those African black slave traders had not engaged in black slave trading, the black slaves in America would not BE here.

Denying reality does not further your debate attempt.

You suck at debate because you are such a liar.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

LOL.

How did "whites" acquire black people as slaves, exactly?

Oh yes. That's right. Something you conveniently omitted. Some blacks sold other blacks to white slave traders. Which puts black slave traders into that whole equation.

Why do you black racists refuse to accept any responsibility by blacks for the historic plight of black slavery?

Blacks in Africa had nothing to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they didn't create nor run the chattel slavery here in America, they didn't create and support Jim Crow. The actions of the Africans do not debunk nor refute what happened in AmeriKKa a far as racism, and discrimination.

The black slave traders in Africa absolutely and undeniably (at least honestly undeniable) had a LOT to do with the treatment of black slaves in America. If those African black slave traders had not engaged in black slave trading, the black slaves in America would not BE here.

Denying reality does not further your debate attempt.

You suck at debate because you are such a liar.

No they did not have anything to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they weren't even aware of what was happening in America and anyways this has nothing to do with the thread, so Mr Bass is not going to argue this.


The topic question is whether pointing out the wrongs that whites have done to blacks consititute hate speech when in fact those wrongs are historical truths?

 

[Liability]

Blacks in Africa had nothing to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they didn't create nor run the chattel slavery here in America, they didn't create and support Jim Crow. The actions of the Africans do not debunk nor refute what happened in AmeriKKa a far as racism, and discrimination.

The black slave traders in Africa absolutely and undeniably (at least honestly undeniable) had a LOT to do with the treatment of black slaves in America. If those African black slave traders had not engaged in black slave trading, the black slaves in America would not BE here.

Denying reality does not further your debate attempt.

You suck at debate because you are such a liar.

No they did not have anything to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they weren't even aware of what was happening in America and anyways this has nothing to do with the thread, so Mr Bass is not going to argue this.


The topic question is whether pointing out the wrongs that whites have done to blacks consititute hate speech when in fact those wrongs are historical truths?

Again, your lie does not further your effort at debate.

Your false denial remains totally unpersuasive because you found it necessary to evade the point. Wuss.

If they weren't here in the first place to BE mistreated, then they would not be mistreated. And if the black slave traders in Africa had not sold other blacks to the white slave traders, then the black slaves would not be here.

You lose.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

If whites would not have purchased Africans there would be no slaves in America, the African traders didn't transport Africans to AmeriKKa which means they are not the blame for what happened to blacks in America.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

The black slave traders in Africa absolutely and undeniably (at least honestly undeniable) had a LOT to do with the treatment of black slaves in America. If those African black slave traders had not engaged in black slave trading, the black slaves in America would not BE here.

Denying reality does not further your debate attempt.

You suck at debate because you are such a liar.

No they did not have anything to do with the treatment of blacks in America, they weren't even aware of what was happening in America and anyways this has nothing to do with the thread, so Mr Bass is not going to argue this.


The topic question is whether pointing out the wrongs that whites have done to blacks consititute hate speech when in fact those wrongs are historical truths?

Again, your lie does not further your effort at debate.

Your false denial remains totally unpersuasive becvuase you found it necessary to evade the point. Wuss.

If they weren't here in the first place to BE mistreated, then they would not be mistreated. And if the black slave traders in Africa had not sold other blacks to the white slave traders, then the black slaves would not be here.

You lose.

If whites would not have brought blacks to America and if there was no slavery in America blacks wouuld not have been enslaved and mistreated, African traders didn't invent and run slavery in America. Whatever happened in America is totally the white man's doing.