Why didn't Strzok expose Trump before the election?

[federalist50]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Apparently you have no idea why the FBI and DOJ are not supposed to involve themselves in politics, or allow any bias to affect how they investigate something! James Comey peter Strzok, Lisa Page and probably other we don't know about have sullied the reputation of the FBI!

 

[Defiant1]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

The dems wanted Trump to be the nominee.
They didn't believe he had any chance to win.
If they had leaked that info Cruz may have won and they didn't think Hillary could beat him.

Their plan was to protect Hillary and Trump.
They never believed she would lose and nobody would ever see this stuff.

 

[Asclepias]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

The dems wanted Trump to be the nominee.
They didn't believe he had any chance to win.
If they had leaked that info Cruz may have won and they didn't think Hillary could beat him.

Their plan was to protect Hillary and Trump.
They never believed she would lose and nobody would ever see this stuff.

Drumpf was already the nominee dipshit.

 

[bripat9643]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

 

[Asclepias]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

They didnt annoucne they were investigating Drumpf you dummy. If they had you would be crying now.

 

[bripat9643]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

They didnt annoucne they were investigating Drumpf you dummy. If they had you would be crying now.

If they anounced they were investigating Trump they would simply have insured Hillary's defeat. They had no basis for investigating Trump, and the American people know it.

The New York times exposed Hillary's use of a private server, not the FBI. Once it became public information, the FBI was obligated to investigate it. Nothing the Trump campaign did during the campaign justified any kind of investigation.

 

[Asclepias]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

They didnt annoucne they were investigating Drumpf you dummy. If they had you would be crying now.

If they anounced they were investigating Trump they would simply have insured Hillary's defeat. They had no basis for investigating Trump, and the American people know it.

The New York times exposed Hillary's use of a private server, not the FBI. Once it became public information, the FBI was obligated to investigate it. Nothing the Trump campaign did during the campaign justified any kind of investigation.

Talking to you is like talking to a retarded door knob. First you clowns claim that they knew for sure Hillary had it in the bag then you claim they were afraid Drumpf would win

 

[impuretrash]

congress is a disgrace...

r's were grand standing, didn't let the witness answer the questions

and repubs got no closer to showing or proving that their was bias in HIS ACTIONS with either investigation....

I thought that was the republican conspiracy theory that this hearing was suppose to fact find....and prove?

The R's did not accomplish that in this dog and pony show today,

they need to release the transcripts of the hearing for 11 hours with Strzok yesterday that was behind closed doors....

maybe there was less grand standing in it and more facts?

The republicans were grandstanding? Did you miss the part when the "guilty" posters were theatrically held aloft in the midst of the proceedings?

 

[whitehall]

Can we agree that there was no collusion between civilian candidate Trump and Russia but there was collusion between Hillary and Russia when she paved the way for Russia to obtain critical uranium sites? Has Mueller looked into allegations that the "Clinton Foundation" received a windfall from Russia? Nope, the dope is dragging the witch hunt on until his Porsche is paid off by the taxpayers.

 

[Care4all]

Can we agree that there was no collusion between civilian candidate Trump and Russia but there was collusion between Hillary and Russia when she paved the way for Russia to obtain critical uranium sites? Has Mueller looked into allegations that the "Clinton Foundation" received a windfall from Russia? Nope, the dope is dragging the witch hunt on until his Porsche is paid off by the taxpayers.

No Whitehall, we can not agree to that at all, because it is simply NOT TRUE...and has been shown and proven not to be true, 100 times over....on the uranium one/donation thing.

There was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian Operatives, the indictments that came out today, points that out...it does not mention the American's name but most everyone knows based on other things that have come out, that the "American" mentioned working and communicating with Guciffer 2.0 was Roger Stone.

 

[bripat9643]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

They didnt annoucne they were investigating Drumpf you dummy. If they had you would be crying now.

If they anounced they were investigating Trump they would simply have insured Hillary's defeat. They had no basis for investigating Trump, and the American people know it.

The New York times exposed Hillary's use of a private server, not the FBI. Once it became public information, the FBI was obligated to investigate it. Nothing the Trump campaign did during the campaign justified any kind of investigation.

Talking to you is like talking to a retarded door knob. First you clowns claim that they knew for sure Hillary had it in the bag then you claim they were afraid Drumpf would win

Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.

 

[bripat9643]

Can we agree that there was no collusion between civilian candidate Trump and Russia but there was collusion between Hillary and Russia when she paved the way for Russia to obtain critical uranium sites? Has Mueller looked into allegations that the "Clinton Foundation" received a windfall from Russia? Nope, the dope is dragging the witch hunt on until his Porsche is paid off by the taxpayers.

No Whitehall, we can not agree to that at all, because it is simply NOT TRUE...and has been shown and proven not to be true, 100 times over....on the uranium one/donation thing.

There was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian Operatives, the indictments that came out today, points that out...it does not mention the American's name but most everyone knows based on other things that have come out, that the "American" mentioned working and communicating with Guciffer 2.0 was Roger Stone.

There was no collusion, dingbat, and even if there were it's not a crime. There is no connection between today's indictments and the Trump campaign. None. Rosenstein isn't even claiming there's a connection.

To sum up, your a sleazy lying dumbass.

 

[jc456]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

I’ll ask you that very question? Why, fk dude we got this entire waste of time witch hunt going on, why didn’t he use his fbi power to go, lookie over here people!!!!!!! I mean he was texting about getting him and all. Shit he had the fking dossier makes no sense absolutely.

Confirms no justification to investigate. His own testimony validates witch hunt. If I’m manafort’s lawyers I’d use his testimony, video so one can see the hate he holds against trump! Damn, laughed my ass off on what a fk nut this fk is!

 

[Avatar4321]

Because there isn’t anything to expose

 

[dudmuck]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

They didnt annoucne they were investigating Drumpf you dummy. If they had you would be crying now.

If they anounced they were investigating Trump they would simply have insured Hillary's defeat. They had no basis for investigating Trump, and the American people know it.

The New York times exposed Hillary's use of a private server, not the FBI. Once it became public information, the FBI was obligated to investigate it. Nothing the Trump campaign did during the campaign justified any kind of investigation.

Talking to you is like talking to a retarded door knob. First you clowns claim that they knew for sure Hillary had it in the bag then you claim they were afraid Drumpf would win

Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.

FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.

 

[hazlnut]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans.

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

because he started a fake investigation based on a fake dossier created by the hilary clinton campaign... They used the fake Dossier to get FISA court surveillance in the hope of finding something, anything, they could use to destroy Trump....

They found nothing.... and their hope of covering up their crimes vanished when hilary lost the election.

Why do you trumpies keep calling the Dossier fake?

You understand, that's not how opposition research works. They find skeletons in the closet that can be exploited.

Here's what's true in the infamous Trump-Russia dossier

Besides the pee tape, here's what the Steele dossier got right

Clapper: 'More and more' of Steele dossier proving to be true

No pee tape... yet.

But the rest is pretty bad. If we could only see who's under the redacted parts... (Jarred)

 

[bripat9643]

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

They didnt annoucne they were investigating Drumpf you dummy. If they had you would be crying now.

If they anounced they were investigating Trump they would simply have insured Hillary's defeat. They had no basis for investigating Trump, and the American people know it.

The New York times exposed Hillary's use of a private server, not the FBI. Once it became public information, the FBI was obligated to investigate it. Nothing the Trump campaign did during the campaign justified any kind of investigation.

Talking to you is like talking to a retarded door knob. First you clowns claim that they knew for sure Hillary had it in the bag then you claim they were afraid Drumpf would win

Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.

FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.

There's pleny of evidence showing that the FBI started sending spies to infiltrate the Trump campaign long before that.

Furthermore:

Why didn't Strzok expose Trump before the election?

Lots of things in the story made no sense. The dossier, for instance, was briefed to the FBI about a month before the Papadopoulos story made its way, second hand, to the FBI. One wonders what sort of standard for plausibility one needed to start an investigation on any story that involved the word “Australian” and phrase “heavy drinking” in close proximity to one another.

On April 28, the Austalian, Alexander Downer who was the former top Australian diplomat in Britain, gave an interview to The Australian. The story is behind paywall, but the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross, perhaps the only reporter in the nation who is actually covering the Mueller investigation rather than taking dictation from FBI and Justice department people who are trying to hide their own malfeasance, gives the best parts.

“By the way, nothing [Papadopoulos] said in that conversation indicated Trump himself had been conspiring with the Russians to collect information on Hillary Clinton. It was just that this guy, [Papadopoulos], clearly knew that the Russians did have material on Hillary Clinton — but whether Trump knew or not?” Downer explained.

“He didn’t say Trump knew or that Trump was in any way involved in this. He said it was about Russians and Hillary Clinton; it wasn’t about Trump,” Downer told The Australian.

Papadopoulos’s reference to Clinton material was vague, Downer suggested.

“He didn’t say dirt; he said material that could be damaging to her. No, he said it would be damaging. He didn’t say what it was.”
…
Downer sent a cable back to Australian government authorities within 48 hours of the Papadopoulos encounter. The information was not provided to the FBI until months later when Joe Hockey, Australia’s ambassador to the U.S., passed it to American authorities in late July 2016. He was prompted to share the information by WikiLeaks’ release of hacked DNC emails.
…
Downer said he felt the information “seemed quite interesting” and “was worth reporting.”
…
Downer also suggested the meeting was brief and Papadopoulos was not drunk, as has been widely reported. According to the profile, Downer and Papadopoulos spoke over a “single short drink.”

Downer also confirmed he confronted Papadopoulos over his comments about then-British Prime Minister David Cameron. Papadopoulos was quoted in the British press a week before the Kensington Wine Room meeting, calling on Cameron to apologize for making negative comments about Trump.
​

Downer, it seems, asked to meet Papadopoulos to jerk a knot in his butt for his comments about David Cameron. There was a conversation in which Papadopoulos opined that the Russians were going to drop “damaging” material on Hillary at some point. Downer dutifully reported the meeting and conversation. Unless Downer is lying, there is nothing here that warranted the FBI using it as the main reason for opening an investigation. In fact, if this is the standard for opening a counterintelligence investigation on a presidential campaign, then there are, in fact, no standards whatsoever.​

 

[bripat9643]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans.

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

because he started a fake investigation based on a fake dossier created by the hilary clinton campaign... They used the fake Dossier to get FISA court surveillance in the hope of finding something, anything, they could use to destroy Trump....

They found nothing.... and their hope of covering up their crimes vanished when hilary lost the election.

Why do you trumpies keep calling the Dossier fake?

You understand, that's not how opposition research works. They find skeletons in the closet that can be exploited.

Here's what's true in the infamous Trump-Russia dossier

Besides the pee tape, here's what the Steele dossier got right

Clapper: 'More and more' of Steele dossier proving to be true

No pee tape... yet.

But the rest is pretty bad. If we could only see who's under the redacted parts... (Jarred)

#1 Cohen never went to Prague, you fucking moron.

#2 Your article says "If that turns out to be true," (the claim that Trump paid the hackers). In other words, nothing in the dossier has been validated. You drilled another dry hole, bonehead.

 

[Tom Horn]

You should get your news from a valid source then. Either youre completely a retarded Drumpf follower or you live under a rock. Do the names Manafort, Flynn, Gates, or Papadopolous mean anything to you?

What do they all plead to?....c'mon Asslips...make me laugh...

 

[Care4all]

I've yet to hear a good answer from Republicans. After all, the FBI had been investigating Trump since July 2016. Comey announced about Hillary's emails right before the election - but nothing about Trump. Why?

Colbert Blows Open ‘Devious And Deep’ FBI Conspiracy To Stop Trump’s Election

Because they had nothing on Trump, you gigantic moron.

They didnt annoucne they were investigating Drumpf you dummy. If they had you would be crying now.

If they anounced they were investigating Trump they would simply have insured Hillary's defeat. They had no basis for investigating Trump, and the American people know it.

The New York times exposed Hillary's use of a private server, not the FBI. Once it became public information, the FBI was obligated to investigate it. Nothing the Trump campaign did during the campaign justified any kind of investigation.

Talking to you is like talking to a retarded door knob. First you clowns claim that they knew for sure Hillary had it in the bag then you claim they were afraid Drumpf would win

Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.

your post is bull crud bripat!

and also the investigation was opened on the Trump campaign because of campaign workers meeting with Russian agents... and information allied foreign intelligence gave us on their meetings....

it was not opened on Trump's doings, but many of his campaign people who were meeting with or communicating with the Russian intelligence operatives... while Trump was claiming no one in his campaign had any Russian contacts... maybe Trump did not know his campaign was meeting with them? But maybe he did know....?

one thing is certain, we will eventually find out....

when the fat lady sings on this investigation.