Why didn't Strzok expose Trump before the election?

Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.
FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
sure! :rolleyes:

it started before there ever was a trump campaign, if you are talking about Carter Paige and Manafort
Wrong. They didn't send spies to infiltrate the Trump campaign before it existed.

What a dumbass.
what spies were infiltrated in to the Trump campaign?
 
FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
sure! :rolleyes:

it started before there ever was a trump campaign, if you are talking about Carter Paige and Manafort
Wrong. They didn't send spies to infiltrate the Trump campaign before it existed.

What a dumbass.
what spies were infiltrated in to the Trump campaign?

Katie Pavlich - Confirmed: FBI Was Spying on the Trump Campaign

Earlier this week the New York Times published a story revealing the FBI was not only spying on the Trump campaign, but had at least one FBI informant embedded within it. Further, the piece reveals the FBI didn't have enough evidence to open a criminal investigation into members of the Trump campaign, so a counterintelligence investigation was launched instead.
 
The reason Strzok didn't "expose" Trump before the election is because he hadn't finished putting his "insurance policy" together yet.

What was that insurance policy, professor?
How would I know? How 'bout if we let him tell us what he meant? Oh, that's right, he WON'T tell us. He doesn't remember saying it.

If you don't know, then WTF are you talking about?

He did explain it multiple times.
 
If they anounced they were investigating Trump they would simply have insured Hillary's defeat. They had no basis for investigating Trump, and the American people know it.

The New York times exposed Hillary's use of a private server, not the FBI. Once it became public information, the FBI was obligated to investigate it. Nothing the Trump campaign did during the campaign justified any kind of investigation.
Talking to you is like talking to a retarded door knob. First you clowns claim that they knew for sure Hillary had it in the bag then you claim they were afraid Drumpf would win

Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.
FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.

You're a retard and a liar.

The FBI announced they were closing the email investigation in July of 16. The same month the counterintelligence investigation began.
 
Talking to you is like talking to a retarded door knob. First you clowns claim that they knew for sure Hillary had it in the bag then you claim they were afraid Drumpf would win

Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.
FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.

You're a retard and a liar.

The FBI announced they were closing the email investigation in July of 16. The same month the counterintelligence investigation began.

Of course, wouldn't want to lose that exoneration letter that was written months earlier.
 
FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
sure! :rolleyes:

it started before there ever was a trump campaign, if you are talking about Carter Paige and Manafort
Wrong. They didn't send spies to infiltrate the Trump campaign before it existed.

What a dumbass.
what spies were infiltrated in to the Trump campaign?
The spies he was warned about in July 2016.
 
Even if that were true, which it isn't, what does it have to do with what I posted? The FBI was compelled to investigate Hillary's server because of information about it that was already in the public domain. There still isn't even a hint of evidence that the Trump did anything to justify an investigation, and, in fact, the FBI can't produce any justification for such an investigation. They did it purely to derail his campaign. It's nothing more than government funded opposition research. It's also a crime.
FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.

You're a retard and a liar.

The FBI announced they were closing the email investigation in July of 16. The same month the counterintelligence investigation began.

Of course, wouldn't want to lose that exoneration letter that was written months earlier.

WTF does that have to do with what I posted?
 
FBI started investing trump campaign russia ties when an Australia reported to USA that Popadopolus was talking to an Australian diplomat about his Russia activities. <---- that is the justification for starting it.
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.

You're a retard and a liar.

The FBI announced they were closing the email investigation in July of 16. The same month the counterintelligence investigation began.

Of course, wouldn't want to lose that exoneration letter that was written months earlier.

WTF does that have to do with what I posted?

Since the exoneration letter was drafted months before the investigation closed, begs the question as to whether there even was an investigation. If you want more of an explanation, you'll have to hold on, can't find my crayons.
 
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.

You're a retard and a liar.

The FBI announced they were closing the email investigation in July of 16. The same month the counterintelligence investigation began.

Of course, wouldn't want to lose that exoneration letter that was written months earlier.

WTF does that have to do with what I posted?

Since the exoneration letter was drafted months before the investigation closed, begs the question as to whether there even was an investigation. If you want more of an explanation, you'll have to hold on, can't find my crayons.

The crayons are in your hand. You're using them.

The only question that begs is, why wasn't the investigation closed sooner?

The answer is that even though they found no criminal culpibility, the FBI still needed to complete their due dilligence regarding any loose ends.
 
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.

You're a retard and a liar.

The FBI announced they were closing the email investigation in July of 16. The same month the counterintelligence investigation began.

Of course, wouldn't want to lose that exoneration letter that was written months earlier.

WTF does that have to do with what I posted?

Since the exoneration letter was drafted months before the investigation closed, begs the question as to whether there even was an investigation. If you want more of an explanation, you'll have to hold on, can't find my crayons.

The crayons are in your hand. You're using them.

The only question that begs is, why wasn't the investigation closed sooner?

The answer is that even though they found no criminal culpibility, the FBI still needed to complete their due dilligence regarding any loose ends.

Due diligence? BTW, side note, the red underline suggests a misspelled word.
th
 
You're a retard and a liar.

The FBI announced they were closing the email investigation in July of 16. The same month the counterintelligence investigation began.

Of course, wouldn't want to lose that exoneration letter that was written months earlier.

WTF does that have to do with what I posted?

Since the exoneration letter was drafted months before the investigation closed, begs the question as to whether there even was an investigation. If you want more of an explanation, you'll have to hold on, can't find my crayons.

The crayons are in your hand. You're using them.

The only question that begs is, why wasn't the investigation closed sooner?

The answer is that even though they found no criminal culpibility, the FBI still needed to complete their due dilligence regarding any loose ends.

Due diligence? BTW, side note, the red underline suggests a misspelled word.
th

What does this mean? Do you have a point?
 
Of course, wouldn't want to lose that exoneration letter that was written months earlier.

WTF does that have to do with what I posted?

Since the exoneration letter was drafted months before the investigation closed, begs the question as to whether there even was an investigation. If you want more of an explanation, you'll have to hold on, can't find my crayons.

The crayons are in your hand. You're using them.

The only question that begs is, why wasn't the investigation closed sooner?

The answer is that even though they found no criminal culpibility, the FBI still needed to complete their due dilligence regarding any loose ends.

Due diligence? BTW, side note, the red underline suggests a misspelled word.
th

What does this mean? Do you have a point?

If nothing else, it means you like to use verbiage that attempts to suggest the FBI was through, and most of us already know the FBI was part of the cover-up of Clinton crimes...dumbass.
 
WTF does that have to do with what I posted?

Since the exoneration letter was drafted months before the investigation closed, begs the question as to whether there even was an investigation. If you want more of an explanation, you'll have to hold on, can't find my crayons.

The crayons are in your hand. You're using them.

The only question that begs is, why wasn't the investigation closed sooner?

The answer is that even though they found no criminal culpibility, the FBI still needed to complete their due dilligence regarding any loose ends.

Due diligence? BTW, side note, the red underline suggests a misspelled word.
th

What does this mean? Do you have a point?

If nothing else, it means you like to use verbiage that attempts to suggest the FBI was through, and most of us already know the FBI was part of the cover-up of Clinton crimes...dumbass.
That's because you are susceptible to propaganda brain washing! :D

It's not your fault, it's your brain's weakness and of course the brainwasher's fault.....who is the real culprit.
 
I think they started investigating the Russians specifically on this, when the Clinton emails were stolen and when our western allied Nations that we share intelligence sent us intelligence, which was part of what they had on the Russians as well...

the Trump campaign was added and their counterintelligence on the Russians who are always watched, got joined with the possible criminal acts of the Trump campaign, with the Carter Page Trips to Moscow and the Papadopolous incident when he was blabbing about the Russians having dirt on Clinton, stolen emails.... back in May 2016.....

which the Ambassador relayed to us a month or two later...when it came out in the open that the DNC emails were stolen.

the fbi fished around a little to see if any of the info they were receiving fro allies had teeth, and then late July, added the Trump campaign workers in a criminal investigation to the Russian counter intelligence investigation.
That's why you don't get paid to think. The investigation into the Trump campaign started before there was any investigation of Hillary's emails.
sure! :rolleyes:

it started before there ever was a trump campaign, if you are talking about Carter Paige and Manafort
Wrong. They didn't send spies to infiltrate the Trump campaign before it existed.

What a dumbass.
what spies were infiltrated in to the Trump campaign?

Katie Pavlich - Confirmed: FBI Was Spying on the Trump Campaign

Earlier this week the New York Times published a story revealing the FBI was not only spying on the Trump campaign, but had at least one FBI informant embedded within it. Further, the piece reveals the FBI didn't have enough evidence to open a criminal investigation into members of the Trump campaign, so a counterintelligence investigation was launched instead.
That's bull crap lies.....

Did you read the link to the New York Times story this Townhall site writer linked as her source to her opinion?

IT SAYS NO SUCH THING.

READ IT!

Code Name Crossfire Hurricane: The Secret Origins of the Trump Investigation
 
The FBI has been stacked with leftist=liberal shills for decades. Don't be fooled..
Silly, the FBI has been lead by republicans/conservatives for more than a half century
Comey is no conservative. He's an establishement RINO.
Comey a republican, Mueller a republican, mccabe even claimed to be a republican even though his wife was not, rosenstein a Republican, and George Tenant, a Republican and before that, Loius Freeh a republican....j edgar hoover, a republican....

need I say more? The FBI has been lead and run by Republican leaders for 3/4's of a Century....

You can call them RINOs if you want, but they certainly were not Democrats or Liberals.
 
The reason Strzok didn't "expose" Trump before the election is because he hadn't finished putting his "insurance policy" together yet.

What was that insurance policy, professor?
How would I know? How 'bout if we let him tell us what he meant? Oh, that's right, he WON'T tell us. He doesn't remember saying it.

If you don't know, then WTF are you talking about?

He did explain it multiple times.
And he was lying. That was obvious. His "insurance policy" could have meant anything from a plan to frame Trump for a non-existing crime, to something much more drastic, and I think you know what I'm talking about. And Strzok is just the kind of POS who would do that. One thing we KNOW is that it didn't have anything to do with was "voting", like he tried to say. That's an insult to everyone's intelligence. Some further digging might uncover a lot more about this sociopath and his intentions.
 
The FBI has been stacked with leftist=liberal shills for decades. Don't be fooled..
Silly, the FBI has been lead by republicans/conservatives for more than a half century
Comey is no conservative. He's an establishement RINO.
Comey a republican, Mueller a republican, mccabe even claimed to be a republican even though his wife was not, rosenstein a Republican, and George Tenant, a Republican and before that, Loius Freeh a republican....j edgar hoover, a republican....

need I say more? The FBI has been lead and run by Republican leaders for 3/4's of a Century....

You can call them RINOs if you want, but they certainly were not Democrats or Liberals.
Comey voted for Hillary. He's a RINO. They're all RINOs. They are Republican for career purposes only, not because they have any Republican principles.
 

Forum List

Back
Top