Why did the "Whites Only" on the outside of a diner bother blacks down south in the 60's??

Status
Not open for further replies.
They wanted equality. Integration, not separatism, was their cause. Integration also meant humane treatment. That said, Black ghetto-culture can be so damned wild and crazy, it's understandable that Whites feared integration like the plague. Please note that I said "culture", not race.

You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.
Thats a terrible philosophy. You dont build yourself up to prove anything to anyone else. Whites didnt do anything other than carry diseases and genocidal intentions everywhere they went. They have done nothing original. They have always had to rely on other cultures to assist them. Nothing about their history is impressive.



You couldn't be more incorrect. We (Whites) did nothing less than build the world's single most advanced civilization. Today, worldwide, it is the Western standard all nations seek to achieve, in everything they do. Yes, cultural diffusion is always a factor, but in that sense, Western Man leads the way yet again. Only Western Man united the world. Only he ventured out to explore it, everywhere, conquer as much of it as he could, and bring Christianity to otherwise wretched souls. I'm sorry you don't like White people, but don't let that cloud your understanding of history. Moreover, if you don't believe me, go to Liberia, and join in it's age-old struggle to establish itself as a "Black United States." Report back on your findings and achievements therein, in due time.

We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.
 
Why the fuck would you want to spend money at a place where you are not wanted? Plus why try and force your way into a diner where they can spit in your food?

Seems like the blacks during that era down south was kind of retarded

They wanted equality. Integration, not separatism, was their cause. Integration also meant humane treatment. That said, Black ghetto-culture can be so damned wild and crazy, it's understandable that Whites feared integration like the plague. Please note that I said "culture", not race.

You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.
 
I
Why the fuck would you want to spend money at a place where you are not wanted? Plus why try and force your way into a diner where they can spit in your food?

Seems like the blacks during that era down south was kind of retarded
Hmm, I think other wise. NOT being a SJW, but if I was born in 1800's I would have definitely opposed slavery and been an abolitionist. I can't understand how anyone that is a Christian or a reasonable human can justify slavery. It's haunting us now.
 
Why the fuck would you want to spend money at a place where you are not wanted? Plus why try and force your way into a diner where they can spit in your food?

Seems like the blacks during that era down south was kind of retarded

They wanted equality. Integration, not separatism, was their cause. Integration also meant humane treatment. That said, Black ghetto-culture can be so damned wild and crazy, it's understandable that Whites feared integration like the plague. Please note that I said "culture", not race.

You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.
Hey lice head. Whites kill each other by the millions. Wake me when the amount of Blacks killing each other is a third of whites killing each other.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
The "Whites Only" sign bothered blacks because they wanted to eat some White food.
 
When it comes to eating, I think all Americans should be allowed into any eating establishments. I think if I was black in the 60s, though, Fuck the white places, I can get greens and weed at the black places, the food's real, too.

That's just me.

Greens, weed, and a bj, and I have all I need. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.
Thats a terrible philosophy. You dont build yourself up to prove anything to anyone else. Whites didnt do anything other than carry diseases and genocidal intentions everywhere they went. They have done nothing original. They have always had to rely on other cultures to assist them. Nothing about their history is impressive.



You couldn't be more incorrect. We (Whites) did nothing less than build the world's single most advanced civilization. Today, worldwide, it is the Western standard all nations seek to achieve, in everything they do. Yes, cultural diffusion is always a factor, but in that sense, Western Man leads the way yet again. Only Western Man united the world. Only he ventured out to explore it, everywhere, conquer as much of it as he could, and bring Christianity to otherwise wretched souls. I'm sorry you don't like White people, but don't let that cloud your understanding of history. Moreover, if you don't believe me, go to Liberia, and join in it's age-old struggle to establish itself as a "Black United States." Report back on your findings and achievements therein, in due time.

We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

Why the fuck would you want to spend money at a place where you are not wanted? Plus why try and force your way into a diner where they can spit in your food?

Seems like the blacks during that era down south was kind of retarded

They wanted equality. Integration, not separatism, was their cause. Integration also meant humane treatment. That said, Black ghetto-culture can be so damned wild and crazy, it's understandable that Whites feared integration like the plague. Please note that I said "culture", not race.

You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.

Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?
 
You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.
Thats a terrible philosophy. You dont build yourself up to prove anything to anyone else. Whites didnt do anything other than carry diseases and genocidal intentions everywhere they went. They have done nothing original. They have always had to rely on other cultures to assist them. Nothing about their history is impressive.



You couldn't be more incorrect. We (Whites) did nothing less than build the world's single most advanced civilization. Today, worldwide, it is the Western standard all nations seek to achieve, in everything they do. Yes, cultural diffusion is always a factor, but in that sense, Western Man leads the way yet again. Only Western Man united the world. Only he ventured out to explore it, everywhere, conquer as much of it as he could, and bring Christianity to otherwise wretched souls. I'm sorry you don't like White people, but don't let that cloud your understanding of history. Moreover, if you don't believe me, go to Liberia, and join in it's age-old struggle to establish itself as a "Black United States." Report back on your findings and achievements therein, in due time.

We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

This is ignorant and completely incorrect.
 
IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.
Thats a terrible philosophy. You dont build yourself up to prove anything to anyone else. Whites didnt do anything other than carry diseases and genocidal intentions everywhere they went. They have done nothing original. They have always had to rely on other cultures to assist them. Nothing about their history is impressive.



You couldn't be more incorrect. We (Whites) did nothing less than build the world's single most advanced civilization. Today, worldwide, it is the Western standard all nations seek to achieve, in everything they do. Yes, cultural diffusion is always a factor, but in that sense, Western Man leads the way yet again. Only Western Man united the world. Only he ventured out to explore it, everywhere, conquer as much of it as he could, and bring Christianity to otherwise wretched souls. I'm sorry you don't like White people, but don't let that cloud your understanding of history. Moreover, if you don't believe me, go to Liberia, and join in it's age-old struggle to establish itself as a "Black United States." Report back on your findings and achievements therein, in due time.

We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

They wanted equality. Integration, not separatism, was their cause. Integration also meant humane treatment. That said, Black ghetto-culture can be so damned wild and crazy, it's understandable that Whites feared integration like the plague. Please note that I said "culture", not race.

You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.

Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?

I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.
 
Thats a terrible philosophy. You dont build yourself up to prove anything to anyone else. Whites didnt do anything other than carry diseases and genocidal intentions everywhere they went. They have done nothing original. They have always had to rely on other cultures to assist them. Nothing about their history is impressive.



You couldn't be more incorrect. We (Whites) did nothing less than build the world's single most advanced civilization. Today, worldwide, it is the Western standard all nations seek to achieve, in everything they do. Yes, cultural diffusion is always a factor, but in that sense, Western Man leads the way yet again. Only Western Man united the world. Only he ventured out to explore it, everywhere, conquer as much of it as he could, and bring Christianity to otherwise wretched souls. I'm sorry you don't like White people, but don't let that cloud your understanding of history. Moreover, if you don't believe me, go to Liberia, and join in it's age-old struggle to establish itself as a "Black United States." Report back on your findings and achievements therein, in due time.

We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.

Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?

I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.

You are speaking white racist ignorance. That's irrational in and of itself. There is no sub saharan Africa. You go say that to an African and see what you get. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. And you about to learn it.

Campaign Launched to Drop "Sub-Saharan-African-Phrase

A new campaign has been launched against the use of the phrase “sub-Saharan Africa” that encompasses African countries south of the Sahara.

The Celebrate Africa Foundation, which is leading the campaign, said the term is a euphemism to distinguish between the five Arab countries in northern Africa and the rest of the continent.

Nigerian-born Chika Onyeani, who is chairman of Celebrate Africa Foundation, told VOA the group has written to the African Union Commission, the United Nations, U.S. President Barack Obama and others urging a halt to the use of “sub-Saharan Africa.”

Onyeani said the phrase is racist and used with the onset and spread of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in Africa.

“I believe that it is demeaning to Africa because Africa was always Africa during the time of Nkrumah (Kwame). Nobody referred to Africa as ‘sub-Saharan Africa,’ but it was due to the AIDS pandemic. That was when this term started being used to refer to black Africa as against Arab Africa,” he said.

Onyeani said he and his group feel “sub-Saharan Africa” is a racist term that should be rejected by all Africans.

“We feel that it’s a racist term, and it is something that Africans should not accept. Right now, there is no other continent that you have sub-anything. You have Europe, you don’t have sub-something Europe; you have America, you don’t have anything sub about (America); you have Asia. But, it’s only the same people who have been referred to as sub-humans that are being referred to as sub-Saharan Africa,” Onyeani said.

Campaign Launched to Drop "Sub-Saharan-African-Phrase

Advanced African Civilizations they never taught us Pt 1 of 4 (Must see!)



"[African] slaveholders didn't think of themselves or their slaves as 'Africans.' Instead they thought of themselves as Edo or Songhai or members of another group. They thought of their slaves as foreigners or inferiors. In the same way, the Spanish, the French, and the English could massacre each other in bloody wars because they thought of themselves as Spanish, French, or English, rather than Europeans.14"

It's Time to Face the Whole Truth About the Atlantic Slave Trade

Did We Sell Each Other Into Slavery: Misconceptions About the African Involvement in the Slave Trade

"Very often I see comments by people who argue that Africans sold each other into slavery. To speak of the slave trade solely as Africans selling each other t is a gross oversimplification of what was a complex historical event. This also seems to be an attempt to shift the burden of the slave trade on the victims of that very trade."

"In How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, Walter Rodney mentions how the white author of a book on the slave trade admitted that he was encouraged by other scholars to blame the slave trade solely on the Africans. This narrative helps to lessen European guilt by making Africans seem just as or even more guilty of being involved in the slave trade. This piece is not an attempt to ignore the African role in the slave trade or to absolve those that were involved, but to to provide a more complete picture of the African involvement in slave trade."

"In the first place, the Portuguese initiated what eventually became the Trans-Atlantic slave trade mainly through slave raids along the coasts of Africa. The first of these raids came in 1444 and was led by Lançarote de Freitas. The problem with raiding for slaves was that it was extremely dangerous. For instance, the slave trader Nuno Tristão was killed during an ambush. Slave raiding proved to be an extremely dangerous way to obtain slaves, but buying slaves was much safer and took less effort on the part of the Europeans. Therefore, the first phase of the slave trade began not with a trade, but with a series of raids. This point is especially important because although the slave trade was on some levels based on a partnership between European buyers and African traders, the slave trade did not begin as such."

"Typically wars in West Africa were relatively short affairs that left a small number of causalities. The introduction of European weapons made these wars more drawn out and destructive affairs. Moreover, the only way Africans could acquire these firearms was through the trade of slaves. A king of Dahomey once requested that Europeans establish a firearms factory in his nation, but this request went ignored. Firearms became necessary for African nations to defend themselves both from African rivals as well as from European intrusion, but the only way to acquire these weapons was through the slave trade. This situation only benefited the competing European powers that were able to play Africans against each other."

Did We Sell Each Other Into Slavery: Misconceptions About the African Involvement in the Slave Trade | HuffPost
 
Thats a terrible philosophy. You dont build yourself up to prove anything to anyone else. Whites didnt do anything other than carry diseases and genocidal intentions everywhere they went. They have done nothing original. They have always had to rely on other cultures to assist them. Nothing about their history is impressive.



You couldn't be more incorrect. We (Whites) did nothing less than build the world's single most advanced civilization. Today, worldwide, it is the Western standard all nations seek to achieve, in everything they do. Yes, cultural diffusion is always a factor, but in that sense, Western Man leads the way yet again. Only Western Man united the world. Only he ventured out to explore it, everywhere, conquer as much of it as he could, and bring Christianity to otherwise wretched souls. I'm sorry you don't like White people, but don't let that cloud your understanding of history. Moreover, if you don't believe me, go to Liberia, and join in it's age-old struggle to establish itself as a "Black United States." Report back on your findings and achievements therein, in due time.

We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

You might want to drop the culture crap too considering what white culture has wrought.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.

Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?

I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.
White ignorance at its finest.

As far as whites go the first to stumble upon Africans were the Greeks (and they thought white europeans were savages) who rightfully proclaimed Africans to be the people that first used the sciences and built civilizations.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
You couldn't be more incorrect. We (Whites) did nothing less than build the world's single most advanced civilization. Today, worldwide, it is the Western standard all nations seek to achieve, in everything they do. Yes, cultural diffusion is always a factor, but in that sense, Western Man leads the way yet again. Only Western Man united the world. Only he ventured out to explore it, everywhere, conquer as much of it as he could, and bring Christianity to otherwise wretched souls. I'm sorry you don't like White people, but don't let that cloud your understanding of history. Moreover, if you don't believe me, go to Liberia, and join in it's age-old struggle to establish itself as a "Black United States." Report back on your findings and achievements therein, in due time.

We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

IM2, I see you use a pic of Marcus Garvey, champion of Black Nationalism and Separatism, to represent yourself. Cool... As a historical figure, I like Garvey. But now you bear the burden of building up your people, such that they can prove to themselves and the world that they're capable of establishing a great nation. Whites did it, like it or not. Now it's your turn. You certainly have sufficient, natural talent. You must first overcome your collective, low self-esteem, and the culture it has created, however. Reflect on Malcolm X -- a gallant warrior, murdered by his own kind, simply for trying to escape the corruption of Black culture within the Nation of Islam. Hear me right. I want you to succeed.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.

Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?

I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.
White ignorance at its finest.

As far as whites go the first to stumble upon Africans were the Greeks (and they thought white europeans were savages) who rightfully proclaimed them to be the people that first used the sciences and built civilizations.
So what happened to the black man then? Why did everyone else pass you all by?
 
We are very correct. Western man colonized most of the world by military force to rob and pillage the resources of others to make money. That's not civilization son, that's thuggishness. So when you understand there are 55 countries in Africa and 54 are not named Libera, let me know.

Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

Nathan, whites built their so called culture up by excluding others from the same opportunities,. Not to mention illegally colonizing other lands. Don't say shit to me until you learn that.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.

Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?

I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.
White ignorance at its finest.

As far as whites go the first to stumble upon Africans were the Greeks (and they thought white europeans were savages) who rightfully proclaimed them to be the people that first used the sciences and built civilizations.
So what happened to the black man then? Why did everyone else pass you all by?
They were invaded by a recessive virus called white people. No one passed them by. Thats impossible.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Indeed, European colonization was characterized by marked cruelty and exploitation, which is most regrettable. It was the state of abject backwardness of Sub-Saharan Africans which invited this malice. That said, others felt that way, as well. Arabs enslaved Blacks before European Man did, and Black kings sold their own people into slavery, after deploying Black slave-hunters into the bush to round them up. Blacks have always been an egregiously oppressed people, everywhere in the world. Nonetheless, it is far too easy for them to blame their problems on others. They must take responsibility for what is theirs, and frankly, there is an aspect of savagery common to their collective behavior which is rather notorious. Of course, such a statement constitutes a gross generalization, but there is enough truth to it that most people believe it, whether they have the guts to admit it or not. When I see groups of Blacks "wilding" in my immediate environment, I do not blame anyone but the guilty parties themselves. People must take responsibility for themselves.

Those are typical human behaviors. Consider how Blacks wage war against each other in Africa. Total savagery reigns supreme. No one is innocent.

Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?

I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.
White ignorance at its finest.

As far as whites go the first to stumble upon Africans were the Greeks (and they thought white europeans were savages) who rightfully proclaimed them to be the people that first used the sciences and built civilizations.
So what happened to the black man then? Why did everyone else pass you all by?
They were invaded by a recessive virus called white people. No one passed them by. Thats impossible.
So you blame others. Thought so.
 
Hey newb shill, I'd rather deal with IM2 than your sorry ass, STFU, you suck, ok?

I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.
White ignorance at its finest.

As far as whites go the first to stumble upon Africans were the Greeks (and they thought white europeans were savages) who rightfully proclaimed them to be the people that first used the sciences and built civilizations.
So what happened to the black man then? Why did everyone else pass you all by?
They were invaded by a recessive virus called white people. No one passed them by. Thats impossible.
So you blame others. Thought so.
They werent invaded by themselves you lice head moron.
 
I'm merely speaking what I consider the truth. Your own message is riddled with contradictions. I encourage you to think rationally. Indeed, the truth is often the harshest of all realities. My bottom-line is that whomever stumbled upon Sub-Saharan Africans first in the human experience, they would have exploited them, because of their abject backwardness, juxtaposed to the seemingly unlimited natural wealth of Africa.
White ignorance at its finest.

As far as whites go the first to stumble upon Africans were the Greeks (and they thought white europeans were savages) who rightfully proclaimed them to be the people that first used the sciences and built civilizations.
So what happened to the black man then? Why did everyone else pass you all by?
They were invaded by a recessive virus called white people. No one passed them by. Thats impossible.
So you blame others. Thought so.
They werent invaded by themselves you lice head moron.
Every continent was invaded at some point. So why don’t other races need that excuse?
 
White ignorance at its finest.

As far as whites go the first to stumble upon Africans were the Greeks (and they thought white europeans were savages) who rightfully proclaimed them to be the people that first used the sciences and built civilizations.
So what happened to the black man then? Why did everyone else pass you all by?
They were invaded by a recessive virus called white people. No one passed them by. Thats impossible.
So you blame others. Thought so.
They werent invaded by themselves you lice head moron.
Every continent was invaded at some point. So why don’t other races need that excuse?
What excuse lice head?
 
So what happened to the black man then? Why did everyone else pass you all by?
They were invaded by a recessive virus called white people. No one passed them by. Thats impossible.
So you blame others. Thought so.
They werent invaded by themselves you lice head moron.
Every continent was invaded at some point. So why don’t other races need that excuse?
What excuse lice head?
For being at the bottom of the race barrel. You blamed it on invaders of a Frikka.
 
They were invaded by a recessive virus called white people. No one passed them by. Thats impossible.
So you blame others. Thought so.
They werent invaded by themselves you lice head moron.
Every continent was invaded at some point. So why don’t other races need that excuse?
What excuse lice head?
For being at the bottom of the race barrel. You blamed it on invaders of a Frikka.
Who told you Blacks were at the bottom of the race barrel lice head?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top