- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,336
- 34,625
- 2,605
How many of "our women and children" have we saved by murdering, maiming, and displacing millions of innocent women and children and others, from Korea to Kandahar, since 1945?Gosh, a whole nest of scumbags! Explains why America is having so many problems.
How dare we use money to defend our women and children when we could be giving it to stoned lazy-ass welfare recipients!
"Stoned lazy-ass welfare recipients" would be a more ethical choice than p$ychotic baby-killing thieve$, IMHO:
"Linda Woodford spent the last 15 years of her career inserting phony numbers in the U.S. Department of Defense's accounts.
"Every month until she retired in 2011, she says, the day came when the Navy would start dumping numbers on the Cleveland, Ohio, office of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, the Pentagon's main accounting agency.
"Using the data they received, Woodford and her fellow DFAS accountants there set about preparing monthly reports to square the Navy's books with the U.S. Treasury's - a balancing-the-checkbook maneuver required of all the military services and other Pentagon agencies.
"And every month, they encountered the same problem.
"Numbers were missing.
"Numbers were clearly wrong.
"Numbers came with no explanation of how the money had been spent or which congressional appropriation it came from. 'A lot of times there were issues of numbers being inaccurate,' Woodford says. 'We didn't have the detail for a lot of it.'"
"The data flooded in just two days before deadline..."
Special Report: The Pentagon's doctored ledgers conceal epic waste | Reuters
It is unfortunate that many Americans are against cutting defense...and so many Americans are against cutting non-defense programs.
The waste by this huge omnipresent government is EPIC in all it's programs, most of which are entirely ineffective, but does grow government and buys votes.
This from the Daily Caller....
Coburn, a medical doctor by trade, begins with Medicaid, highlighting that when the program was at its inception in 1966, it cost $800 million and had an enrollment of 4 million people. In 2012, Medicaid spent $250.5 billion on 55.6 million people a cost increase of 31,212.5 percent and enrollment increase of 1,290 percent over 46 years.
Likewise, according to Coburns report, the various aspects of Medicare have skyrocketed in cost and enrollments. In 1967, the program spent $2.8 billion; in 2012, it spent $471.8 billion a 16,750 percent increase in cost in 45 years. From 1966 to 2010, the enrollees in Medicare Part A, B and C increased by 149.2 percent, 148.9 percent and 807.9 percent, respectively; and from 1974 to 2008, the number of End Stage Renal Disease enrollees increased by 4,022 percent.
Defense health programs have also been party to the increases, the report continues, with defense health programs in 1980 spending $3.7 billion, compared to $53.5 billion in 2012 a 134.9 percent increase in 32 years. And from 1995 to 2011, the number of eligible enrollees in TRICARE increased about 17 percent from 8.3 million to 9.7 million.
Medical care for veterans also increased from $1.1 billion in 1962 to $50.6 billion in 2012 an increase in 4,500 percent in 50 years.
Other health-care programs, like the Indian Health Service and State Childrens Health Insurance Program, also adhered to the upward trend increasing 155.3 percent in enrollment in 43 years and 163.6 percent in 11 years respectively.
Coburn: Medicaid cost has gone up 31,212 percent in 46 years | The Daily Caller