Revolt

[racewright]

Was wondering, and you know this will one day happen.
When there finally is a revolt in the USA who will the military stand with.
Right now I do not think they all would stand with Obama--I know several in service now that absolutely have no respect for him and would have a hard time standing with Obama.

Most can't wait for this administration to be over. As bad as many of us think he is there will one day be someone worse. 50 year 100 years or 500 years like predicting doom and gloom with the climate sooner or later it happens.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Any revolution in the US will see the Military splinter. How bad depends on who starts the shooting.

 

[rightwinger]

The Military will defend their country.....they always have

Take up arms against your country and you will pay the price

 

[racewright]

The Military will defend their country.....they always have

Take up arms against your country and you will pay the price

England---Civil War, Sure paid a price. Kind of agree it will splinter.

 

[JakeStarkey]

RW has the correctness of it.

My nephews tell me (both on active duty as infantry grunt officers) that the officers and other ranks, mostly conservative, will defend the commander in chief and the government. The Oath Keepers, they believe, are only a very few and considered in the same light as white supremacists.

 

[rightwinger]

The Military will defend their country.....they always have

Take up arms against your country and you will pay the price

England---Civil War, Sure paid a price. Kind of agree it will splinter.

Not sure you have a point

Maybe you should make one

 

[racewright]

The Military will defend their country.....they always have

Take up arms against your country and you will pay the price

England---Civil War, Sure paid a price. Kind of agree it will splinter.

Not sure you have a point

Maybe you should make one

Old man now Vietnam Vet--67-68 Joined as was raised my country right or wrong.
But as I swore to defend my country against all enemies both foreign and domestic--kind of glad I'm old man as taking up arms against domestic enemies seems to be closer now than any other time in my lifetime.
Point is do others believe a revolt will (not now) be in the future or will the USA be able to be the once great nation I remember.

 

[rightwinger]

England---Civil War, Sure paid a price. Kind of agree it will splinter.

Not sure you have a point

Maybe you should make one

Old man now Vietnam Vet--67-68 Joined as was raised my country right or wrong.
But as I swore to defend my country against all enemies both foreign and domestic--kind of glad I'm old man as taking up arms against domestic enemies seems to be closer now than any other time in my lifetime.
Point is do others believe a revolt will (not now) be in the future or will the USA be able to be the once great nation I remember.

Do you remember what our country was like in 67-68?

Did you want to take up arms against your country?

 

[racewright]

Not sure you have a point

Maybe you should make one

Old man now Vietnam Vet--67-68 Joined as was raised my country right or wrong.
But as I swore to defend my country against all enemies both foreign and domestic--kind of glad I'm old man as taking up arms against domestic enemies seems to be closer now than any other time in my lifetime.
Point is do others believe a revolt will (not now) be in the future or will the USA be able to be the once great nation I remember.

Do you remember what our country was like in 67-68?

Did you want to take up arms against your country?

Yes and 67 68 we were more united than today but as I remember before that say 58 is the era that we need to think re kindling.
Country's enemy Yes. But Domestic enemy is more difficult to recognize.


That's the point we wasted time fighting the COMMIES and maybe we should have been spending more resources fighting the domestic enemies.

I took up arms fighting the foreign enemy--I would take up arms to fight the domestic enemy
that some day might be needed.
Would you not take up arms to fight the domestic enemy's if needed??

 

[rightwinger]

Old man now Vietnam Vet--67-68 Joined as was raised my country right or wrong.
But as I swore to defend my country against all enemies both foreign and domestic--kind of glad I'm old man as taking up arms against domestic enemies seems to be closer now than any other time in my lifetime.
Point is do others believe a revolt will (not now) be in the future or will the USA be able to be the once great nation I remember.

Do you remember what our country was like in 67-68?

Did you want to take up arms against your country?

Yes and 67 68 we were more united than today but as I remember before that say 58 is the era that we need to think re kindling.
Country's enemy Yes. But Domestic enemy is more difficult to recognize.


That's the point we wasted time fighting the COMMIES and maybe we should have been spending more resources fighting the domestic enemies.

I took up arms fighting the foreign enemy--I would take up arms to fight the domestic enemy
that some day might be needed.
Would you not take up arms to fight the domestic enemy's if needed??

In the 50s and 60s we had terrorists bombing schools and churches. Lynching, arson, intimidation. We had state sponsored tyranny looking the other way as terrorists ran rampant.

Yet you look longingly back to that time and whine that we need to rise up against the government for.....ready?.....I'm serious here.......forcing people to get healthcare

 

[racewright]

Do you remember what our country was like in 67-68?

Did you want to take up arms against your country?

Yes and 67 68 we were more united than today but as I remember before that say 58 is the era that we need to think re kindling.
Country's enemy Yes. But Domestic enemy is more difficult to recognize.


That's the point we wasted time fighting the COMMIES and maybe we should have been spending more resources fighting the domestic enemies.

I took up arms fighting the foreign enemy--I would take up arms to fight the domestic enemy
that some day might be needed.
Would you not take up arms to fight the domestic enemy's if needed??

In the 50s and 60s we had terrorists bombing schools and churches. Lynching, arson, intimidation. We had state sponsored tyranny looking the other way as terrorists ran rampant.

Yet you look longingly back to that time and whine that we need to rise up against the government for.....ready?.....I'm serious here.......forcing people to get healthcare

Well I guess you believe that there was never a good period in the USA's history pity you just do not get the point. This government is not forcing people to get health care for the right reasons it is just another way to get there hands on OPM under the reasoning that it is good for them. I PREDICT A GREAT FUTURE FOR AMERICA IF THEY CAN KEEP THE GOVERNMENT FROM TAKING FROM THERE LABORS UNDER THE PRETENCE OF TAKING CARE OF THEM...Thomas Jefferson.
ASK NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU BUT WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
You see I believe these comments from these great men as they too believed that our biggest dangers do not come from foreign enemies but from domestic ones. We are seeing right now the early dangers of domestic enemies. And not just one political party but all.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes and 67 68 we were more united than today but as I remember before that say 58 is the era that we need to think re kindling.
Country's enemy Yes. But Domestic enemy is more difficult to recognize.


That's the point we wasted time fighting the COMMIES and maybe we should have been spending more resources fighting the domestic enemies.

I took up arms fighting the foreign enemy--I would take up arms to fight the domestic enemy
that some day might be needed.
Would you not take up arms to fight the domestic enemy's if needed??

In the 50s and 60s we had terrorists bombing schools and churches. Lynching, arson, intimidation. We had state sponsored tyranny looking the other way as terrorists ran rampant.

Yet you look longingly back to that time and whine that we need to rise up against the government for.....ready?.....I'm serious here.......forcing people to get healthcare

Well I guess you believe that there was never a good period in the USA's history pity you just do not get the point

I actually believe that socially, this is the best period in American history
Economically, not so much

 

[JakeStarkey]

This era, I agree, is the best socially for all Americans.

The domestic terrorists of the far right and far left have been beaten down.

Economically, we need improvement.

 

[rightwinger]

This era, I agree, is the best socially for all Americans.

The domestic terrorists of the far right and far left have been beaten down.

Economically, we need improvement.

The biggest threat of a revolt in our country comes from the economic side not the social side

Americans are not going to revolt because they have to buy healthcare, they would revolt because of losing the American Dream and not having jobs from which they can support themselves

 

[Mojo2]

Do you remember what our country was like in 67-68?

Did you want to take up arms against your country?

Yes and 67 68 we were more united than today but as I remember before that say 58 is the era that we need to think re kindling.
Country's enemy Yes. But Domestic enemy is more difficult to recognize.


That's the point we wasted time fighting the COMMIES and maybe we should have been spending more resources fighting the domestic enemies.

I took up arms fighting the foreign enemy--I would take up arms to fight the domestic enemy
that some day might be needed.
Would you not take up arms to fight the domestic enemy's if needed??

In the 50s and 60s we had terrorists bombing schools and churches. Lynching, arson, intimidation. We had state sponsored tyranny looking the other way as terrorists ran rampant.

Yet you look longingly back to that time and whine that we need to rise up against the government for.....ready?.....I'm serious here.......forcing people to get healthcare

You are propagandizing.

It isn't about healthcare.

It's about Obama snatching our freedom from us. It's about Obama changing us from being the boss of our government, to our being bossed BY our government.

He seeks to make us all subjects of his rule.

We said no to tyranny in the original Tea Party in Boston.

Now, we have a 21st Century Tea Party to do the exact same thing.

To throw off tyranny.

 

[Mojo2]

This era, I agree, is the best socially for all Americans.

The domestic terrorists of the far right and far left have been beaten down.

Economically, we need improvement.

The biggest threat of a revolt in our country comes from the economic side not the social side

Americans are not going to revolt because they have to buy healthcare, they would revolt because of losing the American Dream and not having jobs from which they can support themselves

The Affordable Care Act consists primarily of taking away many of our liberties by advocating health care for the less fortunate.

The government does not possess the authority to require an individual to purchase health insurance, so why try trick the uniformed into thinking the government knows what is best for them?

The Affordable Care Act is about government control over a large market and the welfare of those people. As more companies drop their health insurance plans, those individuals will be required to join a government-controlled health plan and be subservient to that ideology.

This is just what the socialistic president wants — more people dependent on government and therefore more control over those individual lives. Again, just smoke and mirrors. Watch this hand while I steal your liberties.

— Jack Jaros, Whiting

Affordable Care Act is about government control

 

[aplcr0331]

I know in my area that if there was ever any government mandate to take legally owned guns from citizens that most of the Guard would cease to exist as they would disobey that order.

Revolt ain't gonna happen. No worries.

 

[racewright]

This era, I agree, is the best socially for all Americans.

The domestic terrorists of the far right and far left have been beaten down.

Economically, we need improvement.

The biggest threat of a revolt in our country comes from the economic side not the social side

Americans are not going to revolt because they have to buy healthcare, they would revolt because of losing the American Dream and not having jobs from which they can support themselves[/QUOT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This is the dilemma--when does the social side become so overbearing that it has too much of a damaging effect on the economic side.
My friends this was started before Obama but just worsened since his term.

Now we now get to the root--spending OPM just is not right.

The scary thing is that there are plenty of super wealthy that just say the heck with the USA and move to other more comfortable surrounding's.

The era of the USA being the super place to be is not over yet--but the super rich have and will continue to take the ball and leave the game and play elsewhere.
You see the one thing that all business people and especially the super rich want is not the money but the power to wake up in the morning and look in the mirror and say hey you do this today.

That is what is slowly being taken away and all nations have a history of taking what you have under the falsehood we know better and this is better for you.

 

[Unkotare]

Was wondering, and you know this will one day happen. .

You know? Ok, when?

 

[rightwinger]

This era, I agree, is the best socially for all Americans.

The domestic terrorists of the far right and far left have been beaten down.

Economically, we need improvement.

The biggest threat of a revolt in our country comes from the economic side not the social side

Americans are not going to revolt because they have to buy healthcare, they would revolt because of losing the American Dream and not having jobs from which they can support themselves

The Affordable Care Act consists primarily of taking away many of our liberties by advocating health care for the less fortunate.

The government does not possess the authority to require an individual to purchase health insurance, so why try trick the uniformed into thinking the government knows what is best for them?

The Affordable Care Act is about government control over a large market and the welfare of those people. As more companies drop their health insurance plans, those individuals will be required to join a government-controlled health plan and be subservient to that ideology.

This is just what the socialistic president wants — more people dependent on government and therefore more control over those individual lives. Again, just smoke and mirrors. Watch this hand while I steal your liberties.

— Jack Jaros, Whiting

Affordable Care Act is about government control

I am not going to reply to a multi-color, multi-font post