Why Co2 Can Not Cause Further Warming...

jc, still waiting for you to explain the science, given you claimed to know how we got it all wrong.

In your own words, of course. Screeching "look here!" is not an explanation. Explain it yourself. If you understand it, that should be easy. Specifically, tell us how a (relatively) low absorptivity prevents absorption of the 97% of the far IR that isn't reflected. If the energy isn't absorbed by the ocean, where does it go?

You won't explain, of course. You'll squeal, piss yourself, throw insults and run. Same as you always do. You're obviously too stupid to understand the science, and obviously too gutless to admit it.
 
jc, still waiting for you to explain the science, given you claimed to know how we got it all wrong.

In your own words, of course. Screeching "look here!" is not an explanation. Explain it yourself. If you understand it, that should be easy. Specifically, tell us how a (relatively) low absorptivity prevents absorption of the 97% of the far IR that isn't reflected. If the energy isn't absorbed by the ocean, where does it go?

You won't explain, of course. You'll squeal, piss yourself, throw insults and run. Same as you always do. You're obviously too stupid to understand the science, and obviously too gutless to admit it.

Still waiting for Mamooth, Crick, or Old Crock to produce the math, data and methods proving that 120 ppm has affected the earths temp.. Oddly I dont expect an answer because empirical evidence says it hasn't happened.
 
Still waiting for you to stop lying, Billy. But we're not holding our breath. You'll be a cult crazy until you die, and your cult commands you to lie.
 
jc, still waiting for you to explain the science, given you claimed to know how we got it all wrong.

In your own words, of course. Screeching "look here!" is not an explanation. Explain it yourself. If you understand it, that should be easy. Specifically, tell us how a (relatively) low absorptivity prevents absorption of the 97% of the far IR that isn't reflected. If the energy isn't absorbed by the ocean, where does it go?

You won't explain, of course. You'll squeal, piss yourself, throw insults and run. Same as you always do. You're obviously too stupid to understand the science, and obviously too gutless to admit it.

Still waiting for those datasets and source code that prove CO2 controls climate from any of the AGW cult..
 
Given to you, Kosh, many times. You know that. You're just being a POS liar as well.

Almost all the deniers here are now proud pathological liars. They've chased away the ones who aren't. It's a proud liars' cult, and anyone who won't lie for the cause is purged from the cult.
 
Will Happer, Princeton's Galileo?!?!??!?????


HAAHAAHAAHaHaHaHaHahahahahahaaaaaaaa
 
Dr. Happer's paymasters probably aren't happy with him. They pay him to lie, not to be totally bonkers.

"The demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler. Carbon dioxide is actually a benefit to the world, and so were the Jews." -- Dr. WIlliam Happer

 
The hapless left whining and crying.... because they are called out as liars..
"“Grubering” is just another manifestation of Alinksky’s “Rules for Radicals”. Everyone should read his (Alinsky’s) chapter on ethics and his defense of “The end justifies the means” and how he views all political and social conflicts as war where most anything is justified. The problem with this philosophy is that it always turns out that the means most always corrupt the ends. This idea was not originated by Alinsky as it goes back to Lenin and even further back. Alinsky just brought it into the context of American politics and modern progressives have brought it to a new level. Much of the “anti-skeptic” diatribe relies on one or more of Alinsky’s Rules."

As this person succinctly points out the left and their lies are spouted to protect the agenda.. Gruber is an MIT ass clown who lies like some here do. MIT should be so proud...

Source
 
Dr. Happer's paymasters probably aren't happy with him. They pay him to lie, not to be totally bonkers.

"The demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler. Carbon dioxide is actually a benefit to the world, and so were the Jews." -- Dr. WIlliam Happer



SO your an antisemit? DO you hate Jews? DO you look up to Hitler? that says a lot about the type of person you are. Do you also DENY the holocaust happening too?
 
SO your an antisemit? DO you hate Jews? DO you look up to Hitler? that says a lot about the type of person you are. Do you also DENY the holocaust happening too?

YOU'RE the denier. I guess you think Katrina flooding N.O. was a good thing, because water is necessary for life!!! Apparently your logic isn't any better than your spelling. :lmao:
 
Billy, you're plainly very familiar with the teachings of both Alinsky and Gruber, so please take this opportunity to teach everyone more about your denier cult's various deities.

First, which one is higher on the denier cult totem pole, Alinsky or Gruber?

Are you required to worship both of them to go to denier heaven?

What specific rituals are assigned to the worship of each one?

Which of the two do you personally love the most?
 
Billy, you're plainly very familiar with the teachings of both Alinsky and Gruber, so please take this opportunity to teach everyone more about your denier cult's various deities.

First, which one is higher on the denier cult totem pole, Alinsky or Gruber?

Are you required to worship both of them to go to denier heaven?

What specific rituals are assigned to the worship of each one?

Which of the two do you personally love the most?
And yet still no experiment to disprove Herr Koch's 1901 proof that adding additional CO2 does nothing. Still waiting dude/dudette, It!!!! :oops-28:
 
jc, still waiting for you to explain the science, given you claimed to know how we got it all wrong.

In your own words, of course. Screeching "look here!" is not an explanation. Explain it yourself. If you understand it, that should be easy. Specifically, tell us how a (relatively) low absorptivity prevents absorption of the 97% of the far IR that isn't reflected. If the energy isn't absorbed by the ocean, where does it go?

You won't explain, of course. You'll squeal, piss yourself, throw insults and run. Same as you always do. You're obviously too stupid to understand the science, and obviously too gutless to admit it.
Herr Koch in 1901. There is my proof. Prove me wrong!!!!!

You True denier and hater of mankind!!!!
 
Billy, you're plainly very familiar with the teachings of both Alinsky and Gruber, so please take this opportunity to teach everyone more about your denier cult's various deities.

First, which one is higher on the denier cult totem pole, Alinsky or Gruber?

Are you required to worship both of them to go to denier heaven?

What specific rituals are assigned to the worship of each one?

Which of the two do you personally love the most?

You are worthless troll..
Dont feed the troll.JPG
 

Forum List

Back
Top