Why Are The Liberals So Deafeningly Quiet About Democrat Debate

[bodecea]

I don't think Democrats are all that intellectual. There is nothing they care to debate, or even hear debated. Republicans are interested in what's going on, and who has a plan, and why they believe their plan will work.

Democrats are more emotional. They just see something they don't like, and run around screaming about it. Doesn't matter if the guy attacked a police officer, or even reached for his gun... what matters is, it was another case of police brutality and we're going to scream and yell about racism and blaw blaw blaw.

There is no "thinking" involved in this. Thus the Democrat debate is a waste of time. As one said.... they're bored already. They have to have more pictures, and videos, and emotional cry and scream fests. The DNC needs to threaten that senior citizens are going to be beaten with sticks and thrown out on the street, like I remember them screaming in the 90s, which is how Clinton got in office.

You need to have more emotional slogans, and pictures of the president as a demi-gawd, like Obama's "Yes we can!" and "Believe"... and him with a halo around his head.....

If the DNC get's back to it's rhetoric and empty promises, combined with slick advertising and propaganda.... they will start paying attention to the debates.

 

[bodecea]

Look at the threads on here. Rubio, Bush, Trump, Cruz. One after another of threads started by Liberals attacking one or the other of the Republican Presidential candidates. Here on the very evening of one of the few Democrat debates, not a single thread touting their great aspiring leaders' expected performances. Low expectations? No expectations? Ashamed? Hoping the debate will go unnoticed and there will be no fallout or reckoning? LOL!!

This illustrates just how childish, petty, and clueless most conservatives are.

Actually it points out how scared you Liberals are. How insecure.

I'm sure you wish to believe that....like a security blanket for you....as you suck your........thumb.

 

[DarkFury]

Look at the threads on here. Rubio, Bush, Trump, Cruz. One after another of threads started by Liberals attacking one or the other of the Republican Presidential candidates. Here on the very evening of one of the few Democrat debates, not a single thread touting their great aspiring leaders' expected performances. Low expectations? No expectations? Ashamed? Hoping the debate will go unnoticed and there will be no fallout or reckoning? LOL!!

This illustrates just how childish, petty, and clueless most conservatives are.

Actually it points out how scared you Liberals are. How insecure.

Clearly being childish, sophomoric, naïve, clueless, ignorant, and frightened are prerequisites for being conservative – you don't know anything about democrats, their candidates, or their positions on the issues, otherwise you wouldn't have started this ridiculous, moronic thread whining about the democratic debates.

What debate? Its been an ass kissing contest from the start.

 

[S.J.]

The purpose of the "debate" is to say they had one, to cover up the obvious anointment of Hillary Clinton. Bernie is Hillary's Bill Bradley, only BB might end up winning the nomination this time.

 

[S.J.]

Look at the threads on here. Rubio, Bush, Trump, Cruz. One after another of threads started by Liberals attacking one or the other of the Republican Presidential candidates. Here on the very evening of one of the few Democrat debates, not a single thread touting their great aspiring leaders' expected performances. Low expectations? No expectations? Ashamed? Hoping the debate will go unnoticed and there will be no fallout or reckoning? LOL!!

This illustrates just how childish, petty, and clueless most conservatives are.

Actually it points out how scared you Liberals are. How insecure.

Clearly being childish, sophomoric, naïve, clueless, ignorant, and frightened are prerequisites for being conservative – you don't know anything about democrats, their candidates, or their positions on the issues, otherwise you wouldn't have started this ridiculous, moronic thread whining about the democratic debates.

I saw some reporter interviewing Democrat voters on the street. Almost none of those interviewed could tell the reported who the current Secretary of State was.

Most of them couldn't tell you who the VP is either.

 

[BULLDOG]

If you were a democrat could you really find a reason to post about a whack job and a criminal?

Sure. There are threads about the whack jobs in the right wing clown car you all the time. Plenty of threads on whack jobs.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Look at the threads on here. Rubio, Bush, Trump, Cruz. One after another of threads started by Liberals attacking one or the other of the Republican Presidential candidates. Here on the very evening of one of the few Democrat debates, not a single thread touting their great aspiring leaders' expected performances. Low expectations? No expectations? Ashamed? Hoping the debate will go unnoticed and there will be no fallout or reckoning? LOL!!

There is no "Democrat debate." If you want to discuss the Democratic debate, kindly do so.

Like I've pointed out before, there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party. It is a Communist Socialist Party.

And there is no "Democrat party" in the U.S.

You are starting to sound like Nancy Pelosi whining about Obama care..sticking her nose up saying it is ACA.

The republicans have been using that term forever get over yourself.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Look at the threads on here. Rubio, Bush, Trump, Cruz. One after another of threads started by Liberals attacking one or the other of the Republican Presidential candidates. Here on the very evening of one of the few Democrat debates, not a single thread touting their great aspiring leaders' expected performances. Low expectations? No expectations? Ashamed? Hoping the debate will go unnoticed and there will be no fallout or reckoning? LOL!!

This illustrates just how childish, petty, and clueless most conservatives are.

Actually it points out how scared you Liberals are. How insecure.

Clearly being childish, sophomoric, naïve, clueless, ignorant, and frightened are prerequisites for being conservative – you don't know anything about democrats, their candidates, or their positions on the issues, otherwise you wouldn't have started this ridiculous, moronic thread whining about the democratic debates.

I saw some reporter interviewing Democrat voters on the street. Almost none of those interviewed could tell the reported who the current Secretary of State was.

Most of them couldn't tell you who the VP is either.

I wonder if 3/4 of the low information democrat voters found out who Bernie was would hillary be toast?

 

[Arianrhod]

The republicans have been using that term forever.

Precisely.

 

[S.J.]

This illustrates just how childish, petty, and clueless most conservatives are.

Actually it points out how scared you Liberals are. How insecure.

Clearly being childish, sophomoric, naïve, clueless, ignorant, and frightened are prerequisites for being conservative – you don't know anything about democrats, their candidates, or their positions on the issues, otherwise you wouldn't have started this ridiculous, moronic thread whining about the democratic debates.

I saw some reporter interviewing Democrat voters on the street. Almost none of those interviewed could tell the reported who the current Secretary of State was.

Most of them couldn't tell you who the VP is either.

I wonder if 3/4 of the low information democrat voters found out who Bernie was would hillary be toast?

Good point. The sparring partner might look better than the champ.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The republicans have been using that term forever.

Precisely.

This is kind of funny and so sensitive by the left....

Why the GOP uses the epithet "Democrat Party"



The use of the term “Democrat Party” as a pejorative epithet dates back to the 1940s.

First, “Democrat party” is grammatically incorrect. Parties are typically preceded by adjectives instead of nouns (Republican, Green, Libertarian, etc.). The only major (if you can call it that) American political partynot preceded by an adjective is the Constitution Party.

Second, by calling us the Democrat Party instead of the Democratic Party, Republicans make the word less pleasant sounding; Democratic is a softer sound to the ear than Democrat, which ends in “rat,” a harsher sound.

Third, there’s the “rat” issue. I’d written before about the GOP’s subliminal use of the word “rat” in advertising. Watch this old GOP campaign ad:

The term “Democrat Party” was coined for precisely for the linguistic reasons outlined above: the “Democratic Party” is just another political organization, while the “Democrat Party” is a bunch of rats and similar less-than-human life forms. And who does the racist wing of the GOP consider less-than-human? The 47%, who they universally think of as unemployed, un-American, on welfare, and black.

 

[Moonglow]

If you were a democrat could you really find a reason to post about a whack job and a criminal?

You seem to brag about 214 even though it's not...

 

[the_human_being]

I heard the Democrats were not publicizing the debate because they didn't want Fact Check to find out about it.

 

[DarkFury]

I heard the Democrats were not publicizing the debate because they didn't want Fact Check to find out about it.

Damn and I like to buy stocks. A good bullsh8t meter repair store out there is going full out three shifts with this crackpot and muslim backed sellout.

Damn did I miss out on some BIG money!

 

[Arianrhod]

I heard the Democrats were not publicizing the debate because they didn't want Fact Check to find out about it.

Why would you assume that FactCheck is as oblivious as you are?

 

[Old Rocks]

Look at the threads on here. Rubio, Bush, Trump, Cruz. One after another of threads started by Liberals attacking one or the other of the Republican Presidential candidates. Here on the very evening of one of the few Democrat debates, not a single thread touting their great aspiring leaders' expected performances. Low expectations? No expectations? Ashamed? Hoping the debate will go unnoticed and there will be no fallout or reckoning? LOL!!

Simply, we have two good people in contention, and will listen to what they have to say, and then nominate accordingly. No need for the circus the GOP is providing.

 

[Old Rocks]

I heard the Democrats were not publicizing the debate because they didn't want Fact Check to find out about it.

Damn and I like to buy stocks. A good bullsh8t meter repair store out there is going full out three shifts with this crackpot and muslim backed sellout.

Damn did I miss out on some BIG money!

Now, now, take the pretty pills the nice nurse has for you, and go back to you warm room with the soft walls.

 

[Arianrhod]

The republicans have been using that term forever.

Precisely.

This is kind of funny and so sensitive by the left....

Why the GOP uses the epithet "Democrat Party"



The use of the term “Democrat Party” as a pejorative epithet dates back to the 1940s.

First, “Democrat party” is grammatically incorrect. Parties are typically preceded by adjectives instead of nouns (Republican, Green, Libertarian, etc.). The only major (if you can call it that) American political partynot preceded by an adjective is the Constitution Party.

Second, by calling us the Democrat Party instead of the Democratic Party, Republicans make the word less pleasant sounding; Democratic is a softer sound to the ear than Democrat, which ends in “rat,” a harsher sound.

Third, there’s the “rat” issue. I’d written before about the GOP’s subliminal use of the word “rat” in advertising. Watch this old GOP campaign ad:

The term “Democrat Party” was coined for precisely for the linguistic reasons outlined above: the “Democratic Party” is just another political organization, while the “Democrat Party” is a bunch of rats and similar less-than-human life forms. And who does the racist wing of the GOP consider less-than-human? The 47%, who they universally think of as unemployed, un-American, on welfare, and black.

You seem to think this somehow validates your contention.

 

[Interpol]

This thread only strengthens my theory that liberals and other reasonable, moderate people have lives while conservatives--a mostly older and curmudgeonly crowd--has plenty of time to spare. Only way to explain why comments sections and every single open political forum like this one has a disproportionate amount of conservatives to liberals/moderates compared to real life.

The Democratic debates--not "Democrat", unless you are proud of being willfully stupid--have been garnering an average of 8 million viewers, which far surpasses their ratings even in 2007/2008. I haven't liked the fact that they happen on weekends when I'm working or enjoying a night out, but those are fantastic numbers for them.

Of course, Republican debates have averaged around 18-20 million, but again, that's because two-thirds of their voters are over the age of 50 and either don't work or have evenings off while younger people work evenings and nights, while their numbers also include liberals/moderates who get out the popcorn and watch it with glee how much of a circus it is that the only requirement to be a GOP candidate is that you talk like a pro-wrestler.

 

[the_human_being]

I heard the Democrats were not publicizing the debate because they didn't want Fact Check to find out about it.

Why would you assume that FactCheck is as oblivious as you are?

Who's oblivious? I believe I'm the one informed all you Liberals that you had a debate going on tonight. LOL!!