Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
/----/ You are stuck on stupid. Letting people keep more of their own money IS NOT distribution of wealth. If tax cuts are so bad why does Blue State New York offer tax cuts for new businesses? And please don't call Andy Boy Cuomo a conservative republican./—/ The sad thing about your question is that you’re serious./----/ Everyone who pays taxes gets a cut you dope.It doesn't? As a professional sailor for many years, i can assure you that you are full of shit!
Republicans have found a way for the rising tide to lift only the yachts
Some boats rise a lot higher than others don't they?
Our distribution of wealth IS serious
In the past when we gave tax cuts to the wealthy, it did not create jobs or continued growth
The wealthy just kept the extra money
So why are we repeating the mistake?
They buy Lamboghinis and Rolls Royces, dumbass. What they don't spend on themselves they invest in their businesses, thereby providing you with a job.What they don't buy cars and Snickers bars?
How often do you see a billionaire shopping around for a new Ford truck?
....those are foreign cars and investments in business and providing jobs is called EXPENSES and therefore are not profits to be taxed.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income and EXPORT more of it outside the country. This is ESPECIALLY true in times uncertain.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
You just committed post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy.Well you should be. Every time it happens the economy spikes up and people get happy. The democrats hate happy people and that's why they need to keep them miserable. If these tax laws get passed you're fucked for the next decade.Here's what really worries the left. If Trump can duplicate Reagan's economy with the same tactics they are fucked. They can't have that happen twice. It kind of proves the point.and having to watch bob beeckel and jaun {on tthe Five} all those years trying to make it sound as if Obama was doing a great job with the economy in comparison to Bush?
LOL, you can rest assured, there are no such worries.
Amazing to witness such compartmentalization.
Were you in a coma for 15 years? There was Bush...big tax-cuts that were supposedly self-financing and supposedly would make for booming economy...no? Nothing? A total blackout?
/—-/ Why wont Dems pay their fair share? A Dem Party leader busted for not paying $1.4 million in taxes.View attachment 153904
/----/ Oh but let a Republican say or do something wrong and Libtards crawl out of the woodwork painting all Republicans with the same brush./—-/ Why wont Dems pay their fair share? A Dem Party leader busted for not paying $1.4 million in taxes.View attachment 153904
Idiot, one person is not Democrats make. It's ridiculous to make a general statement like that based on some one example.
/----/ Oh but let a Republican say or do something wrong and Libtards crawl out of the woodwork painting all Republicans with the same brush./—-/ Why wont Dems pay their fair share? A Dem Party leader busted for not paying $1.4 million in taxes.View attachment 153904
Idiot, one person is not Democrats make. It's ridiculous to make a general statement like that based on some one example.
/----/ When I set out on my own at age 18, I was low income and yet I didn't spend all I had. I managed to save about $25 a week in my savings account until I had enough to open a brokerage account. (This was in 1971) That was about $1,300 a year.They buy Lamboghinis and Rolls Royces, dumbass. What they don't spend on themselves they invest in their businesses, thereby providing you with a job.What they don't buy cars and Snickers bars?
How often do you see a billionaire shopping around for a new Ford truck?
....those are foreign cars and investments in business and providing jobs is called EXPENSES and therefore are not profits to be taxed.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income and EXPORT more of it outside the country. This is ESPECIALLY true in times uncertain.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
/----? No I'm telling you that Libtards have a double standard and only speak up when a Dem is exposed as corrupt./----/ Oh but let a Republican say or do something wrong and Libtards crawl out of the woodwork painting all Republicans with the same brush./—-/ Why wont Dems pay their fair share? A Dem Party leader busted for not paying $1.4 million in taxes.View attachment 153904
Idiot, one person is not Democrats make. It's ridiculous to make a general statement like that based on some one example.
Next you'll be telling me all about how two wrongs add up to being right
/----/ When I set out on my own at age 18, I was low income and yet I didn't spend all I had. I managed to save about $25 a week in my savings account until I had enough to open a brokerage account. (This was in 1971) That was about $1,300 a year.They buy Lamboghinis and Rolls Royces, dumbass. What they don't spend on themselves they invest in their businesses, thereby providing you with a job.How often do you see a billionaire shopping around for a new Ford truck?
....those are foreign cars and investments in business and providing jobs is called EXPENSES and therefore are not profits to be taxed.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income and EXPORT more of it outside the country. This is ESPECIALLY true in times uncertain.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
/----? No I'm telling you that Libtards have a double standard and only speak up when a Dem is exposed as corrupt./----/ Oh but let a Republican say or do something wrong and Libtards crawl out of the woodwork painting all Republicans with the same brush./—-/ Why wont Dems pay their fair share? A Dem Party leader busted for not paying $1.4 million in taxes.View attachment 153904
Idiot, one person is not Democrats make. It's ridiculous to make a general statement like that based on some one example.
Next you'll be telling me all about how two wrongs add up to being right
Yes, you did do that. I doubt you even know what that means.You just committed post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy.Well you should be. Every time it happens the economy spikes up and people get happy. The democrats hate happy people and that's why they need to keep them miserable. If these tax laws get passed you're fucked for the next decade.Here's what really worries the left. If Trump can duplicate Reagan's economy with the same tactics they are fucked. They can't have that happen twice. It kind of proves the point.
LOL, you can rest assured, there are no such worries.
Amazing to witness such compartmentalization.
Were you in a coma for 15 years? There was Bush...big tax-cuts that were supposedly self-financing and supposedly would make for booming economy...no? Nothing? A total blackout?
No I did not - claim was that "it worked every time it was tried", which is clearly false if we take a look at tax-cuts and economy since early 2000.
/----/ Yeah, I get your fake outrage. So why don't Democrats pay their fair share?/----? No I'm telling you that Libtards have a double standard and only speak up when a Dem is exposed as corrupt./----/ Oh but let a Republican say or do something wrong and Libtards crawl out of the woodwork painting all Republicans with the same brush./—-/ Why wont Dems pay their fair share? A Dem Party leader busted for not paying $1.4 million in taxes.View attachment 153904
Idiot, one person is not Democrats make. It's ridiculous to make a general statement like that based on some one example.
Next you'll be telling me all about how two wrongs add up to being right
"they" are wrong and so are you. Get it?
/----/ I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus. I'm responding to this statement: "Low income people spend all income they get," and I recounted my story of being low income. But more recently, my eldest daughter set out on her own at 22 and was low income. She worked two jobs and managed to save money from each paycheck./----/ When I set out on my own at age 18, I was low income and yet I didn't spend all I had. I managed to save about $25 a week in my savings account until I had enough to open a brokerage account. (This was in 1971) That was about $1,300 a year.They buy Lamboghinis and Rolls Royces, dumbass. What they don't spend on themselves they invest in their businesses, thereby providing you with a job.
....those are foreign cars and investments in business and providing jobs is called EXPENSES and therefore are not profits to be taxed.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income and EXPORT more of it outside the country. This is ESPECIALLY true in times uncertain.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
This is a long long time ago in a galaxy without credit system sort of story. Times have changed and savings rates have long ago plummeted into the ground.
But even ignoring all that, in 1971 the rich still generally saved a lot more of their income
They buy Lamboghinis and Rolls Royces, dumbass. What they don't spend on themselves they invest in their businesses, thereby providing you with a job.What they don't buy cars and Snickers bars?
How often do you see a billionaire shopping around for a new Ford truck?
....those are foreign cars and investments in business and providing jobs is called EXPENSES and therefore are not profits to be taxed.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income and EXPORT more of it outside the country. This is ESPECIALLY true in times uncertain.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
/----/ I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus. I'm responding to this statement: "Low income people spend all income they get," and I recounted my story of being low income. But more recently, my eldest daughter set out on her own at 22 and was low income. She worked two jobs and managed to save money from each paycheck./----/ When I set out on my own at age 18, I was low income and yet I didn't spend all I had. I managed to save about $25 a week in my savings account until I had enough to open a brokerage account. (This was in 1971) That was about $1,300 a year.....those are foreign cars and investments in business and providing jobs is called EXPENSES and therefore are not profits to be taxed.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income and EXPORT more of it outside the country. This is ESPECIALLY true in times uncertain.
Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
This is a long long time ago in a galaxy without credit system sort of story. Times have changed and savings rates have long ago plummeted into the ground.
But even ignoring all that, in 1971 the rich still generally saved a lot more of their income
/----/ I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus. I'm responding to this statement: "Low income people spend all income they get," and I recounted my story of being low income. But more recently, my eldest daughter set out on her own at 22 and was low income. She worked two jobs and managed to save money from each paycheck./----/ When I set out on my own at age 18, I was low income and yet I didn't spend all I had. I managed to save about $25 a week in my savings account until I had enough to open a brokerage account. (This was in 1971) That was about $1,300 a year.Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
This is a long long time ago in a galaxy without credit system sort of story. Times have changed and savings rates have long ago plummeted into the ground.
But even ignoring all that, in 1971 the rich still generally saved a lot more of their income
I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus - ANECDOTES ARE PISS POOR EVIDENCE and if you want to have serious discussion you need to look up economic data.
Why doesn't you anecdote match the data? Because for every low income person squeezing out a few bucks into piggy bank there are tons more that are maxing out credit cards.
/----/ I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus. I'm responding to this statement: "Low income people spend all income they get," and I recounted my story of being low income. But more recently, my eldest daughter set out on her own at 22 and was low income. She worked two jobs and managed to save money from each paycheck./----/ When I set out on my own at age 18, I was low income and yet I didn't spend all I had. I managed to save about $25 a week in my savings account until I had enough to open a brokerage account. (This was in 1971) That was about $1,300 a year.Rich also SAVE disproportionate % of their income
You are using this as a retort?
Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
This is a long long time ago in a galaxy without credit system sort of story. Times have changed and savings rates have long ago plummeted into the ground.
But even ignoring all that, in 1971 the rich still generally saved a lot more of their income
I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus - ANECDOTES ARE PISS POOR EVIDENCE and if you want to have serious discussion you need to look up economic data.
Why doesn't you anecdote match the data? Because for every low income person squeezing out a few bucks into piggy bank there are tons more that are maxing out credit cards.
/—-/ Now you’re getting it. Congratulations
Don’t we get a separate tax for Medicare & SSN! Why are they listed?
/----/ I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus. I'm responding to this statement: "Low income people spend all income they get," and I recounted my story of being low income. But more recently, my eldest daughter set out on her own at 22 and was low income. She worked two jobs and managed to save money from each paycheck./----/ When I set out on my own at age 18, I was low income and yet I didn't spend all I had. I managed to save about $25 a week in my savings account until I had enough to open a brokerage account. (This was in 1971) That was about $1,300 a year.Yes, which is well above your non-response.
Low income people spend all income they get, middle class spends ALMOST all the income they get, but once the disposable income gets high enough more and more of it just gets amassed in bank accounts and foreign investments.
This is a long long time ago in a galaxy without credit system sort of story. Times have changed and savings rates have long ago plummeted into the ground.
But even ignoring all that, in 1971 the rich still generally saved a lot more of their income
I understand that following a line of thought is tough for you but please focus - ANECDOTES ARE PISS POOR EVIDENCE and if you want to have serious discussion you need to look up economic data.
Why doesn't you anecdote match the data? Because for every low income person squeezing out a few bucks into piggy bank there are tons more that are maxing out credit cards.
That's your retort? Saying people are brainwashed into buying crap they don't want or need (or forced into buying..see obozo care) and not saving?
