Haha, so it was only the perjury that mattered? Really?
I have evidence Thomas sexually assaulted women, which is a far worse crime than perjury.
No, there's no evidence that Thomas sexually assaulted anyone. That's why the Dems had to trump it up.
There is evidence that Clinton committed perjury, about having inappropriate sex, in a sexual assault trial.
Has Thomas been tried for sexual assault?
Theres no evidence? Really? So you consider the direct statements of an individual asserting that they were sexually harassed to not be evidence? Why is that?
And Clinton was never charged with sexual assault either, genius.
How many times has an individual come forward and made a lie about this very subject to get back at another person? Maybe there was an agenda, and just maybe that is the reason it didn't go any further than it did. Just sayin...