We're not discussing an absolute rule.
Forgive me, but your contention earlier of "Whether you realize that or not, it's true" says otherwise, Doc.
It is true, but it's not an absolute rule. I don't see how that is contradictory.
Because the pure truth is absolute. And when you say something is the truth, but not absolute, that constitutes a contradiction.
Rules, like truth, are absolute.
The concept of white privilege is based on the rule that because of their skin color white people enjoy more success and ease of living than their black counterparts. That is what one calls "dealing in absolutes."
No, nothing in the world is "absolute", aside from simple math and formal logic.
It is possible that one day I may become a multi-millionaire. It is also possible that Chrissy Walton's grandchildren will become multi-millionaires.
The fact that it is possible that I might end up that rich does not mean that I am on an "even playing field" with the Walton family - and conversely, the playing field being uneven does not mean that it's impossible for me to be a multi-millionaire.
Nothing in this world is absolute? Really? That's news to me, Doc.
You think it is a reality that blacks are afforded less privileges in life because of their skin color. When one asserts a reality, they are insisting on its absolutism. Thusly, "it is a reality that blacks are afforded less privileges and ease of living because of their skin color" is contention that such a circumstance is absolute.
So, what is meant by "it is easier to be white than it is to be black," unless it is meant to stress an absolute?
I mean it is easier to be white than it is to be black in this country in the same sense that it's more likely that you'll get emphysema or lung cancer if you're a smoker rather than not one.
That is a reality, yet not an absolute - not every smoker gets cancer, and some non-smokers get those same cancers. But the odds aren't the same - it's not "equal".