"White privilege": the latest problem that liberals have created to bash white people with

[TyroneSlothrop]

Reality proves our superiority.

Reality is a joint product of observer and observed...my observation is you are an imbecile...

 

[Steinlight]

What mistakes are those? Can you cite one specific mistake in their work and why this would render the results inaccurate? Which part of Murray and Hernstein's results are incorrect and what part of their conclusion is wrong?

Your first mistake was posting that right wing trash manifesto the "Bull Curve" your second mistake was trying to post to me when you are clearly an inferior poster...

Yea, exactly, you have no response. You can't even articulate an objection. Not that I should expect one from you, given that the black IQ on average is two standard deviations below the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ. I am probably asking too much of you to articulate a reasoned position.

 

[Steinlight]

Reality proves our superiority.

Reality is a joint product of observer and observed...my observation is you are an imbecile...

No, that is just projection on your part. Hopefully one day you can overcome your inferiority complex and stop blaming the white man for your failures and inborn stupidity. Oh well, talk to you later Tyrone.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

What mistakes are those? Can you cite one specific mistake in their work and why this would render the results inaccurate? Which part of Murray and Hernstein's results are incorrect and what part of their conclusion is wrong?

Your first mistake was posting that right wing trash manifesto the "Bull Curve" your second mistake was trying to post to me when you are clearly an inferior poster...

Yea, exactly, you have no response. You can't even articulate an objection. Not that I should expect one from you, given that the black IQ on average is two standard deviations below the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ. I am probably asking too much of you to articulate a reasoned position.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

No, that is just projection on your part. Hopefully one day you can overcome your inferiority complex and stop blaming the white man for your failures and inborn stupidity. Oh well, talk to you later Tyrone.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

 

[Flopper]

Leon Kamin of Scientific American Debunks The Bell Curve

An extensive review of the book. "At long last, Herrnstein and Murray let it all hang out: "Affirmative action, in education and the workplace alike, is leaking a poison into the American soul." Having examined the American condition at the close of the 20th century, these two philosopher-kings conclude, "It is time for America once again to try living with inequality, as life is lived...." This kind of sentiment, I imagine, is what led "New York Times" columnist Bob Herbert to the conclusion that "The Bell Curve" "is just a genteel way of calling somebody a ni**er." Herbert is right. The book has nothing to do with science."

LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".

If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....

I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.

The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.

Leon Kamin of Scientific American Debunks The Bell Curve

An extensive review of the book. "At long last, Herrnstein and Murray let it all hang out: "Affirmative action, in education and the workplace alike, is leaking a poison into the American soul." Having examined the American condition at the close of the 20th century, these two philosopher-kings conclude, "It is time for America once again to try living with inequality, as life is lived...." This kind of sentiment, I imagine, is what led "New York Times" columnist Bob Herbert to the conclusion that "The Bell Curve" "is just a genteel way of calling somebody a ni**er." Herbert is right. The book has nothing to do with science."

LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".

If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....

I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.

The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.

One of the studies' findings was that the IQs of transracially adopted black children did not differ significantly from that of children raised by their biological parents in the same area. Due to confounding of social and biological factors, it was inconclusive in terms of determining relative environmental or biological contributions to racial differences in IQ - as the study's result could be interpreted as supporting either hypothesis.

Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The results show environmental variation doesn't account for the difference in IQ. How is it inconclusive?

Read the link

 

[Steinlight]

LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".

If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....

I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.

The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.

LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".

If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....

I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.

The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.

One of the studies' findings was that the IQs of transracially adopted black children did not differ significantly from that of children raised by their biological parents in the same area. Due to confounding of social and biological factors, it was inconclusive in terms of determining relative environmental or biological contributions to racial differences in IQ - as the study's result could be interpreted as supporting either hypothesis.

Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The results show environmental variation doesn't account for the difference in IQ. How is it inconclusive?

Read the link

I did, the problem is, you didn't. You should actually read your own links before you post them. You can't even articulate a position based off the material you cite. This is slightly problematic.

 

[Christophera]

'"White privilege": the latest problem that liberals have created to bash white people with'

Another ridiculous lie from the right.

You run cover for the conspiracy that partisan politics are.

It is neither left or right. It is an infiltration of government and society that attempts to use race and instinct to divide America further than it already is.

Your feigned sickness in the effort to gain unwitting sympathizers is noted and exposed. We even see the covert group using the like function of the site, which will certainly not be seen to be accountable to the supposed approval.

 

[Christophera]

Yes, we are privileged with our higher IQs. Except it isn't really privilege, it is a product of biology, of nature, of evolution. This is nothing new, losers always resent winners and their success. We have built the greatest civilization on Earth so of course we will have targets on our back from those with inferiority complexes.

Talk to us when you return to reality.

You are in a fantasy world where you think all races are "equal", lol. Which has no scientific basis whatsoever.

By law all races have equal right, which is proper because they have equal needs as human beings.

The races are different in the amount of genes controlling their potentials or development, and what one may lack a little of is well compensated for by a superior amount of another vital genetic trait they have. Such differences are highly individualistic as well, meaning such generalization is not really accurate or fair. Human beings are complex.

Most importantly is that equal rights allow those genetic traits to compliment one another in greater function and than any one race might achieve over time, benefiting all races as those differences also slowly disappear when the genes naturally blend over time with love.

You share your feigned sickness with other covert infiltrators here, or you are simply deeply mislead by their covert, collusive subterfuge.