TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #81
Reality is a joint product of observer and observed...my observation is you are an imbecile...Reality proves our superiority.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reality is a joint product of observer and observed...my observation is you are an imbecile...Reality proves our superiority.
Yea, exactly, you have no response. You can't even articulate an objection. Not that I should expect one from you, given that the black IQ on average is two standard deviations below the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ. I am probably asking too much of you to articulate a reasoned position.Your first mistake was posting that right wing trash manifesto the "Bull Curve" your second mistake was trying to post to me when you are clearly an inferior poster...What mistakes are those? Can you cite one specific mistake in their work and why this would render the results inaccurate? Which part of Murray and Hernstein's results are incorrect and what part of their conclusion is wrong?
No, that is just projection on your part. Hopefully one day you can overcome your inferiority complex and stop blaming the white man for your failures and inborn stupidity. Oh well, talk to you later Tyrone.Reality is a joint product of observer and observed...my observation is you are an imbecile...Reality proves our superiority.
Yea, exactly, you have no response. You can't even articulate an objection. Not that I should expect one from you, given that the black IQ on average is two standard deviations below the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ. I am probably asking too much of you to articulate a reasoned position.Your first mistake was posting that right wing trash manifesto the "Bull Curve" your second mistake was trying to post to me when you are clearly an inferior poster...What mistakes are those? Can you cite one specific mistake in their work and why this would render the results inaccurate? Which part of Murray and Hernstein's results are incorrect and what part of their conclusion is wrong?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZNo, that is just projection on your part. Hopefully one day you can overcome your inferiority complex and stop blaming the white man for your failures and inborn stupidity. Oh well, talk to you later Tyrone.
LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".Leon Kamin of Scientific American Debunks The Bell Curve
An extensive review of the book. "At long last, Herrnstein and Murray let it all hang out: "Affirmative action, in education and the workplace alike, is leaking a poison into the American soul." Having examined the American condition at the close of the 20th century, these two philosopher-kings conclude, "It is time for America once again to try living with inequality, as life is lived...." This kind of sentiment, I imagine, is what led "New York Times" columnist Bob Herbert to the conclusion that "The Bell Curve" "is just a genteel way of calling somebody a ni**er." Herbert is right. The book has nothing to do with science."
If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....
I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.
The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.
LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".Leon Kamin of Scientific American Debunks The Bell Curve
An extensive review of the book. "At long last, Herrnstein and Murray let it all hang out: "Affirmative action, in education and the workplace alike, is leaking a poison into the American soul." Having examined the American condition at the close of the 20th century, these two philosopher-kings conclude, "It is time for America once again to try living with inequality, as life is lived...." This kind of sentiment, I imagine, is what led "New York Times" columnist Bob Herbert to the conclusion that "The Bell Curve" "is just a genteel way of calling somebody a ni**er." Herbert is right. The book has nothing to do with science."
If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....
I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.
The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.
One of the studies' findings was that the IQs of transracially adopted black children did not differ significantly from that of children raised by their biological parents in the same area. Due to confounding of social and biological factors, it was inconclusive in terms of determining relative environmental or biological contributions to racial differences in IQ - as the study's result could be interpreted as supporting either hypothesis.
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
The results show environmental variation doesn't account for the difference in IQ. How is it inconclusive?
LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".
If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....
I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.
The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.
LOL, you call that a "debunking"? All he said was, "that's racist".
If you read careful with your "superior" LOL Intelligence you will note the its New York Time columnist Bob Herbert who made what you are whining as amounting to a "that's racist" commentary ...read the gosh dang article get informed instead of being opinionated and stupid ....
I was responding to your comment in bold about calling blacks n-iggers for saying they have lower IQs. His argument there basically equates to "that's racist". As for his article. He claims IQ differences between the races, that low IQ for blacks in America is the result of slavery or discrimination, and in Africa is the result of Colonialism, though this is speculation with no evidence. The funny thing is, you didn't even read your own article, you just mindlessly linked to something you think "disproved" what is a scientific fact, by throwing out some puffed up opinion piece.
The fact is, the idea that under an environment where all else being equal, IQ differences between the races would cease to exist, has no merit. This has been debunked by the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Where White, Mulatto, and African-American children adopted by upper middle class white parents had the same IQ disparities that existed in prior studies.
One of the studies' findings was that the IQs of transracially adopted black children did not differ significantly from that of children raised by their biological parents in the same area. Due to confounding of social and biological factors, it was inconclusive in terms of determining relative environmental or biological contributions to racial differences in IQ - as the study's result could be interpreted as supporting either hypothesis.
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
The results show environmental variation doesn't account for the difference in IQ. How is it inconclusive?
Read the link
'"White privilege": the latest problem that liberals have created to bash white people with'
Another ridiculous lie from the right.
By law all races have equal right, which is proper because they have equal needs as human beings.You are in a fantasy world where you think all races are "equal", lol. Which has no scientific basis whatsoever.Talk to us when you return to reality.Yes, we are privileged with our higher IQs. Except it isn't really privilege, it is a product of biology, of nature, of evolution. This is nothing new, losers always resent winners and their success. We have built the greatest civilization on Earth so of course we will have targets on our back from those with inferiority complexes.