- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,384
- 24,018
- 2,290
GaryDog, let's be real. Sub-saharan Africans(black Africans) never built a major city when whites or other non-black races weren't around, never built a seafairing ship, no major technical advances came from sub-Saharan Africa. This is simply a fact, facts can't be racist. Why blacks have not been able to advance without foreign involvement is because they evolved and adapted in resource rich sub-saharan Africa. They had an abundance of fruit at arms reach all the time, they didn't have to deal with the harsh cold and devise ways to survive it, they had it pretty easy as far as survival is concerned. No need to do much innovating. So that's why they have lower IQs on average than whites. It doesn't mean white people are superior in all ways to blacks, but in intellect, on average they are. This doesn't make black people less human, its just the way things were and are. Blacks are superior in their own right. They are superior in athleticism, they have a superior immune system for dealing with malaria, they have better rhythm in my opinion too.
We are not all the same, regardless what your eggheaded diversity instructor told you.
The only reason whites are richer is because they are more innovative because they had to be in the climate and environment they evolved in.
All facts. Whether you think they're racist or I'm racist.... Thems the facts, bud.
No, dumbfuck. The first civilization that had the agricultural and domestic draft-animal advantages lived in the fertile crescent (middle east) about 12,000 years ago. Thanks to the latitudinal spread of Eurasia there was easy and frequent sharing of temperate crops and agricultural methods for millions of early settlers to the area, and this allowed more people to avoid the task of food production and develop things like written language, tools for battle, food storage, etc.
It was WHITES who had the resource advantage, not sub Saharan Africans, you dullard twit. There was no trade between civilizations in Africa due to the dense jungle and the Sahara desert. Not to mention the land in Africa is not that suited to farming (neither is the land in the Amazon, hence they have still relied on hunting/gathering to this day).
The close proximity of living in settled civilizations helped them develop immunity to diseases -- an advantage indigenous cultures in the Americas didn't have. Similarly, cultures in the Americas lived on a continent with no cows, horses or other animals that assisted with farming and battle, so they were easy pickings for the whites from Europe who had all the luck of horses, cows, goats, agricultural abundance, etc., at their fingertips.
You are an idiot. I've read that book, and you are misinterpreting it.