Diuretic
Permanently confused
So, using the logic that because a species shares some similarities in genes, when did we split from Mice? Were we mice like before we became Ape like?
Some of us are still mice-like Rock
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, using the logic that because a species shares some similarities in genes, when did we split from Mice? Were we mice like before we became Ape like?
All mammals have a common ancestor. All vertebrates also have a common ancestor.So, using the logic that because a species shares some similarities in genes, when did we split from Mice? Were we mice like before we became Ape like?
So, using the logic that because a species shares some similarities in genes, when did we split from Mice? Were we mice like before we became Ape like?
Because they make that a comparison to a chimp, and they don't like what they see.What I can't understand, and maybe someone can explain it...why does it upset people so much to think we share an ancestor with a chimp?
Because they make that a comparison to a chimp, and they don't like what they see.
How complex can it possibly be? He's arguing over a range that is so isolated that it has no bearing on the overall argument he's making. OK, a brook trout may not be like other trout, but I'm willing to bet it ain't even close to a monkey.
Pardon me if this has been mentioned already, but does evolution include monkeys becoming man, or has that been ruled in or out by Science?
Yes, most likely our immediate ancestors looked more like chimps than like modern man. I suppose if you want to lump all non human primates into a single group, you could make a point that "man descended from monkeys."
From a scientific point of view, it is a lot more complex than that.
If I recall correctly, there's no more than one or two genes different between men and apes....
yeah, you're right... no evidence of evolution.
.
Here is the question we were addressing.
Here is the answer.
[sarc]That is really relevant.[/sarc]Maybe the chimps don't like what they see, either.
[sarc]That is really relevant.[/sarc]Maybe the chimps don't like what they see, either.
No it is not. It is purely liberal relativism.[sarc]That is really relevant.[/sarc]Maybe the chimps don't like what they see, either.
It is as relevant as humans looking at chimps, not liking what they see, and denying that we share a common ancestor based on emotion.
No it is not. It is purely liberal relativism.[sarc]That is really relevant.[/sarc]
It is as relevant as humans looking at chimps, not liking what they see, and denying that we share a common ancestor based on emotion.
I see you are jumpy today.No it is not. It is purely liberal relativism.It is as relevant as humans looking at chimps, not liking what they see, and denying that we share a common ancestor based on emotion.
Please limit your trolling to the flame zone, thanking you in advance for your cooperation.