Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
OK, just fer shits n giggles, let's hear your plan on doing just that, TDS Mac1958. You are so off the rails about Trump, I do findOur political/electoral "system" (ha) is so perverted by money and power and negative incentives that it's not attracting better people.
Until and unless we fix the system, together, there's no reason for it to change or improve.
As I've pointed out, many times:OK, just fer shits n giggles, let's hear your plan on doing just that, TDS Mac1958. You are so off the rails about Trump, I do find
it difficult to believe you can be rational about anything else at all, but hope springs eternal, and let's see how this plays out!
How do "we" fix this system together?
You have blatantly misjudged me, TDS Mac1958 , I notice you mentioned exactly Jack Shit about lobbying, why is that?As I've pointed out, many times:
Such a system would change the incentives, motivations and behaviors of politicians virtually overnight.
- Short, strict term limits
- Publicly-funded elections
- Bipartisan redistricting commissions
- Nonpartisan primaries
- Ranked choice voting
Since you're a hardcore partisan ideologue who lacks the capacity for, or interest in, collaborative ideas, I don't expect your agreement or approval.
OK, just fer shits n giggles, let's hear your plan on doing just that, TDS Mac1958. You are so off the rails about Trump, I do find
it difficult to believe you can be rational about anything else at all, but hope springs eternal, and let's see how this plays out!
How do "we" fix this system together?
I'm a "big picture" type.
Your selective quoting says all I need to know, tard.
I've also said that the nutters on the ends of the spectrum most likely won't be a part of any lasting solutions.Imagine spending 8 years calling anyone who voted for Trump every single name under the sun and more, railing on and on about how we lack heart, soul and mind and are beyond hope and help--and then saying "we need to fix the system together"
It's busted, Mac. No one believes you.
Yeah, whatever, dumbass. You just dismissed her for no reason because you're really a leftarded idiot.I've also said that the nutters on the ends of the spectrum most likely won't be a part of any lasting solutions.
So, good news. You're off the hook, Karen.
He said he was going to smash my head. He’s full of shit.
I like all but don't know enough about number 5 to have an opinionAs I've pointed out, many times:
Such a system would change the incentives, motivations and behaviors of politicians virtually overnight.
- Short, strict term limits
- Publicly-funded elections
- Bipartisan redistricting commissions
- Nonpartisan primaries
- Ranked choice voting
Since you're a hardcore partisan ideologue who lacks the capacity for, or interest in, collaborative ideas, I don't expect your agreement or approval.
Well, that's a great start.I like all but don't know enough about number 5 to have an opinion
View attachment 808956
Look at the above picture and tell me when we are going to wake the hell up.
That's Feinstein and she looks like a damn newly discovered Egyptian Mummy. Worse yet her cognitive ability is perhaps marginally better than that of a mummy.
Then we have Biden & McConnell with their senior citizen "moments"
We are allowing people with brains operating well below normal status to not only represent us but RULE OVER US.
I have said time after time we DESPERATELY NEED
Term limits
And age RESTRICTIONS
It is well past time to put an end to the "EXCLUSIVE CLUB"
Needs to be age restricted. A test is useless because at that age episodes can occur at any time that alter a person's abilities to function. Unless you want to administer tests before every major vote then it's pointless.There are 85-year-olds running marathons and people in their 90s who are sharper than people half their age. I wouldn't establish a blanket prohibition based on advanced age, it should be based on health and cognitive ability. In the not-too-distant future, aging might be stopped or reversed, then what? Do we have to lift the age restriction? What happens when life expectancy rises to 150+? When a 90-year old is the equivalent of a 40-year-old biologically? We're going to get there this century, perhaps sooner than later with technologies like CRISPR.
You’re not fooling anyone, pussy. You’re just a harmless idiot running his mouth from the safety of his computer. Only complete pussies play the internet tough guy routine because they know they’re not actually going to do anything.I've beat down motherfuckers you're terrified of. If you wanna mess with me, you're going to have a bad time of it.
I know violence and how to hurt a human being. It comes like second nature to me.
Trump looks fairly healthy for someone pushing 80. Most people look more like Feinstein by the time they're up there.You forgot Grassley...and Trump.
Hey, just us stuck in our two party system that rewards politicians who just don't know when to hang up the towel and pass the torch.
That’s not what he said. And he already admitted he’s not going to do what he said. Maybe you two should try to get on the same page.You ain't got a head to smash, dummy
They can be tested every 6 months and at any time if they show signs of cognitive decline or senility. Older men and women offer experience and shouldn't be barred from serving the nation in elected office. I say this as a 50-year-old, so it's not like I'm arguing for this as someone in his 70s or 80s.Needs to be age restricted. A test is useless because at that age episodes can occur at any time that alter a person's abilities to function. Unless you want to administer tests before every major vote then it's pointless.
Term limits, limit the options people have to elect good leadership. If people were educated on what constitutes good leadership and on the type of policies that serve their interests, they could continually vote for good people to represent them. Having the freedom to elect the same person continually for 20 or 40 years, who has proven to be a good leader, with an impeccable record of serving the public good, in my opinion, is better than barring them from serving based on "term limits".As I've pointed out, many times:
Such a system would change the incentives, motivations and behaviors of politicians virtually overnight.
- Short, strict term limits
- Publicly-funded elections
- Bipartisan redistricting commissions
- Nonpartisan primaries
- Ranked choice voting
Since you're a hardcore partisan ideologue who lacks the capacity for, or interest in, collaborative ideas, I don't expect your agreement or approval.
