What Now, Republicans???

[Redfish]

Most folks understand the binary nature of our political system.

Between Democrat and Republican, you pick the one closest to your views....and bubble in the little circle.


There are two outliers....

a. The dopes who boast that they never vote for either, 'they're the same...' which usually means that they are afraid to have to confront arguments, or to lazy to study the choices.

b. Loser-terians, the 'my way or else' folks who more often than not, throw elections to the Democrats.

(This does not include the out-right liars who claim to be Republicans, but consistently post support of the Liberals....we all know who that is, don't we.)






Now that the American people have finally done what we on the Right, more particularly, conservatives, implored them to do six years ago, kick the community organizer to the curb......we need to elucidate what it is we hoped for when we gave our votes, our support to the Republican candidates.


Here is my considered list, in no particular order, of what the anti-Leftist aims should be.



1. ObamaCare: Repeal this fraudulent bill, replace it with one based on more accurate and truthful accounts, i.e., numbers covered, actual costs to the nation and of deductibles, promises about keeping doctors and plans.


Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked the American Medical Association because of his conflicting views on socialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished
(The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).


b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."
Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252

Knowing the thinking behind ObamaCare should make it easier to end it.




2. Close and man the borders, and remind the world that we are a sovereign nation.
Before any consideration be given to dealing with those who have broken our laws, stop the flow of new law-breakers.

a. The "Global Governance Movement," the Soviet-inspired United Nations, claims precedence over a wide area of issues: budget practices, law enforcement, criminal law, criminal law, school curriculum, textbooks, immigration, border enforcement, healthcare, parental care, discipline of children, employment, multilingualism, gender composition of government bodies, among others. UN Human Rights treaties address all of the above.
Fonte, "Submission or Sovereignty."


b. There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction.
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, and without national sovereignty.



More to follow.

Wow, a list of total bullshit from DB. What Americans want are jobs and good paying salaries and education and healthcare.

Republicans want minimum wage and "let him die".

In all fairness to Republicans, they want to do away with the minimum wage laws too.

yes, minimum wage laws help no one.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Most folks understand the binary nature of our political system.

Between Democrat and Republican, you pick the one closest to your views....and bubble in the little circle.


There are two outliers....

a. The dopes who boast that they never vote for either, 'they're the same...' which usually means that they are afraid to have to confront arguments, or to lazy to study the choices.

b. Loser-terians, the 'my way or else' folks who more often than not, throw elections to the Democrats.

(This does not include the out-right liars who claim to be Republicans, but consistently post support of the Liberals....we all know who that is, don't we.)






Now that the American people have finally done what we on the Right, more particularly, conservatives, implored them to do six years ago, kick the community organizer to the curb......we need to elucidate what it is we hoped for when we gave our votes, our support to the Republican candidates.


Here is my considered list, in no particular order, of what the anti-Leftist aims should be.



1. ObamaCare: Repeal this fraudulent bill, replace it with one based on more accurate and truthful accounts, i.e., numbers covered, actual costs to the nation and of deductibles, promises about keeping doctors and plans.


Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked the American Medical Association because of his conflicting views on socialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished
(The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).


b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."
Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252

Knowing the thinking behind ObamaCare should make it easier to end it.




2. Close and man the borders, and remind the world that we are a sovereign nation.
Before any consideration be given to dealing with those who have broken our laws, stop the flow of new law-breakers.

a. The "Global Governance Movement," the Soviet-inspired United Nations, claims precedence over a wide area of issues: budget practices, law enforcement, criminal law, criminal law, school curriculum, textbooks, immigration, border enforcement, healthcare, parental care, discipline of children, employment, multilingualism, gender composition of government bodies, among others. UN Human Rights treaties address all of the above.
Fonte, "Submission or Sovereignty."


b. There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction.
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, and without national sovereignty.



More to follow.

Wow, a list of total bullshit from DB. What Americans want are jobs and good paying salaries and education and healthcare.

Republicans want minimum wage and "let him die".

In all fairness to Republicans, they want to do away with the minimum wage laws too.

1. "The Daily Caller published a video earlier this week in which Gruber said a lack of transparency was key to Obamacare’s passage because the “stupidity of the American voter” would have killed the bill. (RELATED: Gruber: Lack of Transparency Was Key)

Another video surfaced in which Gruber called Americans “stupid,” followed by a third video in which Gruber said an aspect of Obamacare implementation represented “basic exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.”
Gruber In Fourth Video Obama Is Not A Stupid Man VIDEO The Daily Caller


a. Here is Gruber, in his own words:
Gruber Video C-SPAN.org


2. Republicans want minimum wage and "let him die"
Not Republicans....those knowledgeable in the area of economics....obviously, that doesn't include you.

1. 1. The workers who suffer most are the most marginal, usually youths, and racial minorities, disproportionally represented among low-skilled workers.
   2. Not only are the above made less employable by minimum wage laws, but they lose the opportunity to upgrade their skills via on-the-job training.
      Race and Economics by Thomas Sowell, chapter three

3.Republicans want minimum wage and "let him die"

" [Democrat] GOV. LAMM ASSERTS ELDERLY, IF VERY ILL, HAVE 'DUTY TO DIE'
GOV. LAMM ASSERTS ELDERLY IF VERY ILL HAVE DUTY TO DIE - NYTimes.com



I can see where restricting you to posting about subjects you know about would end your posting career.

 

[Mr. President]

1.) Secure the border

2.) Solidify net neutrality by law, protect it under first amendment.

3.) Heavily amend Obamacare

Private Property and the Net US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The reason why I love you Poli!

 

[candycorn]

Gee, six months in and the GOP is 0-2 with the OP's wishes. Who didn't see that coming.

 

[JimH52]

Most folks understand the binary nature of our political system.

Between Democrat and Republican, you pick the one closest to your views....and bubble in the little circle.


There are two outliers....

a. The dopes who boast that they never vote for either, 'they're the same...' which usually means that they are afraid to have to confront arguments, or to lazy to study the choices.

b. Loser-terians, the 'my way or else' folks who more often than not, throw elections to the Democrats.

(This does not include the out-right liars who claim to be Republicans, but consistently post support of the Liberals....we all know who that is, don't we.)






Now that the American people have finally done what we on the Right, more particularly, conservatives, implored them to do six years ago, kick the community organizer to the curb......we need to elucidate what it is we hoped for when we gave our votes, our support to the Republican candidates.


Here is my considered list, in no particular order, of what the anti-Leftist aims should be.



1. ObamaCare: Repeal this fraudulent bill, replace it with one based on more accurate and truthful accounts, i.e., numbers covered, actual costs to the nation and of deductibles, promises about keeping doctors and plans.


Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked the American Medical Association because of his conflicting views on socialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished
(The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).


b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."
Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252

Knowing the thinking behind ObamaCare should make it easier to end it.




2. Close and man the borders, and remind the world that we are a sovereign nation.
Before any consideration be given to dealing with those who have broken our laws, stop the flow of new law-breakers.

a. The "Global Governance Movement," the Soviet-inspired United Nations, claims precedence over a wide area of issues: budget practices, law enforcement, criminal law, criminal law, school curriculum, textbooks, immigration, border enforcement, healthcare, parental care, discipline of children, employment, multilingualism, gender composition of government bodies, among others. UN Human Rights treaties address all of the above.
Fonte, "Submission or Sovereignty."


b. There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction.
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, and without national sovereignty.



More to follow.

Wow, a list of total bullshit from DB. What Americans want are jobs and good paying salaries and education and healthcare.

Republicans want minimum wage and "let him die".

In all fairness to Republicans, they want to do away with the minimum wage laws too.

yes, minimum wage laws help no one.

Well, no one that you care about. That would be a single working mother of three that has two jobs and trying to afford daycare. They are not in the GOP tent, for sure....

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It must be hell being an Obungles supporter and trying to defend the disaster

 

[candycorn]

332-206
The Defense Rests.

 

[JimH52]

332-206
The Defense Rests.

Be easy on Sassy. She and Staph are having love life issues......not with each other I don't think,

 

[toxicmedia]

This is off topic, but not inside my head...so....

There is a sure fire way to tell if any righty is so far gone that they can't be reasoned with.

When they use the term "Democrat Party" instead of the "Democratic Party"

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party"

Others say it because the people they listen to say it, and don't even realize it's incorrect.

Some defend it as correct, which it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the name of the party, which is the "Democratic Party", and they pretty much get to name themselves.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

There I said my peace.

My interruption is over

 

[initforme]

If the ACA is repealed, then what is the alternate plan to ensure all have insurance? Going back to the way it was isn't the answer. Where is that plan?

 

[Redfish]

Most folks understand the binary nature of our political system.

Between Democrat and Republican, you pick the one closest to your views....and bubble in the little circle.


There are two outliers....

a. The dopes who boast that they never vote for either, 'they're the same...' which usually means that they are afraid to have to confront arguments, or to lazy to study the choices.

b. Loser-terians, the 'my way or else' folks who more often than not, throw elections to the Democrats.

(This does not include the out-right liars who claim to be Republicans, but consistently post support of the Liberals....we all know who that is, don't we.)






Now that the American people have finally done what we on the Right, more particularly, conservatives, implored them to do six years ago, kick the community organizer to the curb......we need to elucidate what it is we hoped for when we gave our votes, our support to the Republican candidates.


Here is my considered list, in no particular order, of what the anti-Leftist aims should be.



1. ObamaCare: Repeal this fraudulent bill, replace it with one based on more accurate and truthful accounts, i.e., numbers covered, actual costs to the nation and of deductibles, promises about keeping doctors and plans.


Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked the American Medical Association because of his conflicting views on socialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished
(The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin s Forced Famine 1932-33).


b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."
Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252

Knowing the thinking behind ObamaCare should make it easier to end it.




2. Close and man the borders, and remind the world that we are a sovereign nation.
Before any consideration be given to dealing with those who have broken our laws, stop the flow of new law-breakers.

a. The "Global Governance Movement," the Soviet-inspired United Nations, claims precedence over a wide area of issues: budget practices, law enforcement, criminal law, criminal law, school curriculum, textbooks, immigration, border enforcement, healthcare, parental care, discipline of children, employment, multilingualism, gender composition of government bodies, among others. UN Human Rights treaties address all of the above.
Fonte, "Submission or Sovereignty."


b. There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction.
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, and without national sovereignty.



More to follow.

Wow, a list of total bullshit from DB. What Americans want are jobs and good paying salaries and education and healthcare.

Republicans want minimum wage and "let him die".

In all fairness to Republicans, they want to do away with the minimum wage laws too.

yes, minimum wage laws help no one.

Well, no one that you care about. That would be a single working mother of three that has two jobs and trying to afford daycare. They are not in the GOP tent, for sure....

raising the MW could cause that single mother to lose her job. When a company is forced to increase its cost of labor, it has too choices: raise prices which will reduce sales and reduce the need for labor, or cut the number of employees. Either way your single mother could be out of a job, then what do you propose she do?

 

[Redfish]

If the ACA is repealed, then what is the alternate plan to ensure all have insurance? Going back to the way it was isn't the answer. Where is that plan?

Why is to the goal to provide everyone with insurance? Before ACA no one without insurance was refused medical care. Those of us who paid for insurance covered those who did not have it. The exact same situation exists under ACA when some are given free or heavily subsidized insurance. But, with ACA we now also have to pay for a huge inefficient govt beaurocracy, and the ones who are paying are paying more, have higher deductibles, and are forced to buy coverage that they don't want or need.

ACA is a fricken disaster. It attempted to fix a problem that did not exist and made everything worse----typical government program.

 

[Redfish]

This is off topic, but not inside my head...so....

There is a sure fire way to tell if any righty is so far gone that they can't be reasoned with.

When they use the term "Democrat Party" instead of the "Democratic Party"

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party"

Others say it because the people they listen to say it, and don't even realize it's incorrect.

Some defend it as correct, which it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the name of the party, which is the "Democratic Party", and they pretty much get to name themselves.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

There I said my peace.

My interruption is over

the members of that party are democrats, so democrat party is correct. Sorry if the grammatically accurate words offend you.

 

[toxicmedia]

This is off topic, but not inside my head...so....

There is a sure fire way to tell if any righty is so far gone that they can't be reasoned with.

When they use the term "Democrat Party" instead of the "Democratic Party"

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party"

Others say it because the people they listen to say it, and don't even realize it's incorrect.

Some defend it as correct, which it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the name of the party, which is the "Democratic Party", and they pretty much get to name themselves.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

There I said my peace.

My interruption is over

the members of that party are democrats, so democrat party is correct. Sorry if the grammatically accurate words offend you.

You poor poor thing.

An individual member of the Democratic Party is a Democrat.

The party is named the Democratic Party.

The difference is whether you're referring to one of them, or all of them.

I've got you covered above. You're one of those who a say "Democrat Party" because the people you listen to say it, and you don't even realize it's incorrect.

 

[Redfish]

This is off topic, but not inside my head...so....

There is a sure fire way to tell if any righty is so far gone that they can't be reasoned with.

When they use the term "Democrat Party" instead of the "Democratic Party"

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party"

Others say it because the people they listen to say it, and don't even realize it's incorrect.

Some defend it as correct, which it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the name of the party, which is the "Democratic Party", and they pretty much get to name themselves.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

There I said my peace.

My interruption is over

the members of that party are democrats, so democrat party is correct. Sorry if the grammatically accurate words offend you.

You poor poor thing.

An individual member of the Democratic Party is a Democrat.

The party is named the Democratic Party.

The difference is whether you're referring to one of them, or all of them.

I've got you covered above. You're one of those who a say "Democrat Party" because the people you listen to say it, and you don't even realize it's incorrect.

it is the party of democrats, there is nothing democratic about it. We need to call things what they are, not what we wish they were.

I agree that many use "democrat party" to denigrate them, but if the shoe fits------------------------------

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is off topic, but not inside my head...so....

There is a sure fire way to tell if any righty is so far gone that they can't be reasoned with.

When they use the term "Democrat Party" instead of the "Democratic Party"

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party"

Others say it because the people they listen to say it, and don't even realize it's incorrect.

Some defend it as correct, which it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the name of the party, which is the "Democratic Party", and they pretty much get to name themselves.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

There I said my peace.

My interruption is over

the members of that party are democrats, so democrat party is correct. Sorry if the grammatically accurate words offend you.

You poor poor thing.

An individual member of the Democratic Party is a Democrat.

The party is named the Democratic Party.

The difference is whether you're referring to one of them, or all of them.

I've got you covered above. You're one of those who a say "Democrat Party" because the people you listen to say it, and you don't even realize it's incorrect.

I would purposely use 'Democrat Party' because it would incense Ms. Truthie......

....Man...I miss her.

"You bad christain!!!!"

 

[toxicmedia]

This is off topic, but not inside my head...so....

There is a sure fire way to tell if any righty is so far gone that they can't be reasoned with.

When they use the term "Democrat Party" instead of the "Democratic Party"

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party"

Others say it because the people they listen to say it, and don't even realize it's incorrect.

Some defend it as correct, which it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the name of the party, which is the "Democratic Party", and they pretty much get to name themselves.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

There I said my peace.

My interruption is over

the members of that party are democrats, so democrat party is correct. Sorry if the grammatically accurate words offend you.

You poor poor thing.

An individual member of the Democratic Party is a Democrat.

The party is named the Democratic Party.

The difference is whether you're referring to one of them, or all of them.

I've got you covered above. You're one of those who a say "Democrat Party" because the people you listen to say it, and you don't even realize it's incorrect.

it is the party of democrats, there is nothing democratic about it. We need to call things what they are, not what we wish they were.

I agree that many use "democrat party" to denigrate them, but if the shoe fits------------------------------

I've still got you covered above, and you're still quite wrong.

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party", and you're simply repeating that. What I find amusing is how you don't even like the Democratic process, you're a Constitutional Republican...remember?

And you're still one of those who a say "Democrat Party" because the people you listen to say it, and you don't even realize it's incorrect.

So which is it?...correct, or incorrect and you'll just continue the childish name calling?

 

[toxicmedia]

This is off topic, but not inside my head...so....

There is a sure fire way to tell if any righty is so far gone that they can't be reasoned with.

When they use the term "Democrat Party" instead of the "Democratic Party"

Rush Limbaugh defends the epithet by stating "there is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party"

Others say it because the people they listen to say it, and don't even realize it's incorrect.

Some defend it as correct, which it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the name of the party, which is the "Democratic Party", and they pretty much get to name themselves.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

There I said my peace.

My interruption is over

the members of that party are democrats, so democrat party is correct. Sorry if the grammatically accurate words offend you.

You poor poor thing.

An individual member of the Democratic Party is a Democrat.

The party is named the Democratic Party.

The difference is whether you're referring to one of them, or all of them.

I've got you covered above. You're one of those who a say "Democrat Party" because the people you listen to say it, and you don't even realize it's incorrect.

I would purposely use 'Democrat Party' because it would incense Ms. Truthie......

....Man...I miss her.

"You bad christain!!!!"

I can best the three of you without having to try. I can just recycle everything from my first post on this off topic diversion.

Saying the "Democrat Party", for those who do it on purpose, is very childish. You might as well call them the "Icky Sticky Party"

 

[g5000]

1. ObamaCare: Repeal this fraudulent bill,

Wait for iiiiiiiiiiit...

replace it with one based on more accurate and truthful accounts,

BWA-HA-HA-HA! This is the part where the GOP falls on its fat, mushy, rhinophymatous face.

We are...what...more than six years into the Obama Adminstration and the Republican legislation for comprehensive health care reform is...(drum roll)...missing.

The dog ate your homework? It's lost in the mail? Your pen ran out of ink? Some illegal Mexicans stole it because we don't have Voter ID?

How many decades did health care costs outrun the pace of inflation? And what did the GOP do in the way of comprehensive reform in all that time?

Nothing.

Meanwhile, the Democrats were telegraphing, loudly and clearly, exactly what they would do if given half a chance.

Sooner or later you rubes will finally figure out we were all sold down the health care river to the Democrats by their Republican drinking buddies.

 

[g5000]

There are two outliers....

a. The dopes who boast that they never vote for either, 'they're the same...' which usually means that they are afraid to have to confront arguments, or to lazy to study the choices.

b. Loser-terians, the 'my way or else' folks who more often than not, throw elections to the Democrats.

You forgot a third category that is intelligent enough to know that when you "vote for the lesser of two evils", you are still voting for evil. We also believe a vote should be earned and not an entitlement.

As for Libertarians ("Loser-terians"), I find it completely unsurprising you sneer at people who stick to their principles.