Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How so? There is an uncontrovertial corralation between deregulation and bubble economics.
OK you don't have an actual bubble between your ears. It is a figure of speach.. a discription... I'll accept that my attempt to describe your brain as insufficiently lacking in scope.
No, there isn't. When interest rates are artificially lowered you get misallocation of capital which is a bubble that inevitably pops.
No. Definitely not.
How so? There is an uncontrovertial corralation between deregulation and bubble economics.
OK you don't have an actual bubble between your ears. It is a figure of speach.. a discription... I'll accept that my attempt to describe your brain as insufficiently lacking in scope.
No, there isn't. When interest rates are artificially lowered you get misallocation of capital which is a bubble that inevitably pops.
Allocation of capital is either allowed under the rules or it is dissallowed under the rules. That mechanism is regulated by statute and administered by regulators and supported by the justice system. The interest rates generally effect inflation ...not investment capital. Oportunity in the markets is the prime engine for investment. Not everyone ...scratch that...hardly anyone borrows money from a bank to invest in financial markets...that is until the Bush administration showed that there would be no meaningful regulation in banking.
No, there isn't. When interest rates are artificially lowered you get misallocation of capital which is a bubble that inevitably pops.
No. Definitely not.
I'm afraid it's true, in simple terms of course.
No, there isn't. When interest rates are artificially lowered you get misallocation of capital which is a bubble that inevitably pops.
Allocation of capital is either allowed under the rules or it is dissallowed under the rules. That mechanism is regulated by statute and administered by regulators and supported by the justice system. The interest rates generally effect inflation ...not investment capital. Oportunity in the markets is the prime engine for investment. Not everyone ...scratch that...hardly anyone borrows money from a bank to invest in financial markets...that is until the Bush administration showed that there would be no meaningful regulation in banking.
I recommend you both read this article:
Business Cycle Primer - Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. - Mises Institute
Along with anything else you can find on the Austrian theory of the business cycle.
No. Definitely not.
I'm afraid it's true, in simple terms of course.
Allocation of capital is either allowed under the rules or it is dissallowed under the rules. That mechanism is regulated by statute and administered by regulators and supported by the justice system. The interest rates generally effect inflation ...not investment capital. Oportunity in the markets is the prime engine for investment. Not everyone ...scratch that...hardly anyone borrows money from a bank to invest in financial markets...that is until the Bush administration showed that there would be no meaningful regulation in banking.
I recommend you both read this article:
Business Cycle Primer - Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. - Mises Institute
Along with anything else you can find on the Austrian theory of the business cycle.
You and Llewellyn are out of touch with the reality of todays economics. The deregulation of credit is the main culprit. This isn't 1945. It used to be that a loan of more than 12% anually was a crime. It was called loan sharking. Also there was a time when credit cards were relatively hard to get. Nowadays too many people have credit and use credit unwisely. They have been conned into borrowing against fictional assets such as the supposed worth of real estate in unsupported upswings of housing values. These anomolies are a direct result of lack of regulation. If you believe the tripe in your article I wouldn't read another word you recommend.
I'm afraid it's true, in simple terms of course.
I recommend you both read this article:
Business Cycle Primer - Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. - Mises Institute
Along with anything else you can find on the Austrian theory of the business cycle.
You and Llewellyn are out of touch with the reality of todays economics. The deregulation of credit is the main culprit. This isn't 1945. It used to be that a loan of more than 12% anually was a crime. It was called loan sharking. Also there was a time when credit cards were relatively hard to get. Nowadays too many people have credit and use credit unwisely. They have been conned into borrowing against fictional assets such as the supposed worth of real estate in unsupported upswings of housing values. These anomolies are a direct result of lack of regulation. If you believe the tripe in your article I wouldn't read another word you recommend.
It's not the Austrians that are out of touch with reality, I'm afraid.
You and Llewellyn are out of touch with the reality of todays economics. The deregulation of credit is the main culprit. This isn't 1945. It used to be that a loan of more than 12% anually was a crime. It was called loan sharking. Also there was a time when credit cards were relatively hard to get. Nowadays too many people have credit and use credit unwisely. They have been conned into borrowing against fictional assets such as the supposed worth of real estate in unsupported upswings of housing values. These anomolies are a direct result of lack of regulation. If you believe the tripe in your article I wouldn't read another word you recommend.
It's not the Austrians that are out of touch with reality, I'm afraid.
This isn't Austria.
It cracks me up that the current crop of moonbats like to equate they are liberals in the traditional sense.
Hint: You're not even close.
You are a shrill, knob-gobbling minority that, unfortunately, has the control of the media which enables you to push your socialist agenda on the rest of us.
So please stop trying to pretend you have the same mentality of someone like JFK. He would be a republican today most likely, for sure he would be attacked on a daily basis by the same legions of kooks you sent after Palin or anyone else conservative.
Get with the program. The current crop of liberals would probably have been hung for treason by the founders.
You aren't liberals, you're wayyyy past that now.
I think the truth is, the savage capitalista's are the ones pushing their radical agenda on the rest of us, because those who'd benefit from a bit more socialism is a huge group, much larger than your 2-3 percent "rest of us" you speak of. Capitalism is always the top few percent richest, shoving their radical agenda down the throats of the rest of us.
Capitalism never works as promised. If it did, we wouldn't have bubbles and economic tsunamis. The ebbs and flows of capitalism are unfortunately becoming more dangerous now that we operate in a global environment and not in a quasi-closed society. As a nation, I wonder how many more crashes we can take and once again slooooooooowly pull ourselves out of it with a collective WHEW.
Everything else pales by camparison, and frankly, captialism would work better without the governemtn going and fcukking with it............
I think the truth is, the savage capitalista's are the ones pushing their radical agenda on the rest of us, because those who'd benefit from a bit more socialism is a huge group, much larger than your 2-3 percent "rest of us" you speak of. Capitalism is always the top few percent richest, shoving their radical agenda down the throats of the rest of us.
Capitalism never works as promised. If it did, we wouldn't have bubbles and economic tsunamis. The ebbs and flows of capitalism are unfortunately becoming more dangerous now that we operate in a global environment and not in a quasi-closed society. As a nation, I wonder how many more crashes we can take and once again slooooooooowly pull ourselves out of it with a collective WHEW.
best out there s0n............best out there.
Capitalism never works as promised. If it did, we wouldn't have bubbles and economic tsunamis. The ebbs and flows of capitalism are unfortunately becoming more dangerous now that we operate in a global environment and not in a quasi-closed society. As a nation, I wonder how many more crashes we can take and once again slooooooooowly pull ourselves out of it with a collective WHEW.
best out there s0n............best out there.
Capitalism is a system of pure CONSUMTION. Left unattended it would consume EVERYTHING and there would finally be one rich guy with everything and everyone else would be dead. It only works governed and regulated.
Anyone that thinks otherwise is a complete fucking moron...that would include you.
Capitalism never works as promised. If it did, we wouldn't have bubbles and economic tsunamis. The ebbs and flows of capitalism are unfortunately becoming more dangerous now that we operate in a global environment and not in a quasi-closed society. As a nation, I wonder how many more crashes we can take and once again slooooooooowly pull ourselves out of it with a collective WHEW.
best out there s0n............best out there.
Capitalism is a system of pure CONSUMTION. Left unattended it would consume EVERYTHING and there would finally be one rich guy with everything and everyone else would be dead. It only works governed and regulated.
Anyone that thinks otherwise is a complete fucking moron...that would include you.
Less than 6% of scientists are Republican. Republicans want to teach mysticism in public schools. They are anti education and white Republicans make up the largest single group on welfare and food stamps.
So the best thing the Democrats have done is not be Republicans.
Republicans want to teach mysticism in public schools
Sounds about right. Bay Buchanan said the intellectuals weren't welcome in the GOP.Less than 6% of scientists are Republican. Republicans want to teach mysticism in public schools. They are anti education and white Republicans make up the largest single group on welfare and food stamps.
So the best thing the Democrats have done is not be Republicans.
You are a shrill, knob-gobbling minority that, unfortunately, has the control of the media which enables you to push your socialist agenda on the rest of us.
You are a shrill, knob-gobbling minority that, unfortunately, has the control of the media which enables you to push your socialist agenda on the rest of us.
Then how do you explain the current Democratic majority and Obama's election?
Ame®icano;1471642 said:You are a shrill, knob-gobbling minority that, unfortunately, has the control of the media which enables you to push your socialist agenda on the rest of us.
Then how do you explain the current Democratic majority and Obama's election?
One word: FREE
Vote for Pedro... and your wildest dreams will come true.
FREE healthcare, FREE houses, FREE cars, everything FREE...
Ame®icano;1471642 said:Then how do you explain the current Democratic majority and Obama's election?
One word: FREE
Vote for Pedro... and your wildest dreams will come true.
FREE healthcare, FREE houses, FREE cars, everything FREE...
One of the more assinine evaluations of the 2008 election I have ever seen
No response required
You are a shrill, knob-gobbling minority that, unfortunately, has the control of the media which enables you to push your socialist agenda on the rest of us.
Then how do you explain the current Democratic majority and Obama's election?
You are a shrill, knob-gobbling minority that, unfortunately, has the control of the media which enables you to push your socialist agenda on the rest of us.
Then how do you explain the current Democratic majority and Obama's election?
well lets here. in 06 the democraps won on a lie. their agenda??? stop the war in Iraq. knowing full well Bush would veto it.
Osama??? he was elected by the liberal nazi MSM and ACORN.
yep. thats how.
Then how do you explain the current Democratic majority and Obama's election?
well lets here. in 06 the democraps won on a lie. their agenda??? stop the war in Iraq. knowing full well Bush would veto it.
Osama??? he was elected by the liberal nazi MSM and ACORN.
yep. thats how.
Thats what I like to hear!
Republicans are still clueless as to why they were humiliated in the last two elections. The fact that their platform no longer appeals to Americans is inconceivable.
Yea....ACORN screwed you......keep that thought
