Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The data is everywhere…look it up.An editorial that's so stupid nobody put their name on for writing it? When will you crackpots ever learn. Besides, you already got texted
You got grabbedThe data is everywhere…look it up.
You regressives had to put more dark people into a position of home ownership. You forced lenders to loan money to incapable filthy degenerates and you cost us legit folks billions and billions of dollars.
It has indeed. But it is Democrats who use the term Trickle down. So let's see when Reagan was President what happens to the 5 quintiles. The lowest is entry into the job market. The top is the very highest earners. Anyway, and i know this to be a fact, every quintile improved. Even the lowest improved. Call it trickle down or up. But the fact is the economic health of the USA improved under Reagan.Has wealth trickled down on 99% of Americans or are the rich getting richer and the poor poorer? The proof is in the pudding.
The regulations that separated commercial banking from investment banking.
How ?
Profits are privatized and risk is socialized
You regressives insist on forever expanding the underclass….you are hell-bent on importing all of Mexico’s filth….you insist that we are the dumping grounds for the world most degenerate.Has wealth trickled down on 99% of Americans or are the rich getting richer and the poor poorer? The proof is in the pudding.
Why would the poor get poorer? Inflation causes this. So again, what else makes the poor get poorer. Who wastes a lot of time measuring the poor? By the way you handed me a disagree on my Reagan explanation yet others handed me a brilliant. They got it right.Has wealth trickled down on 99% of Americans or are the rich getting richer and the poor poorer? The proof is in the pudding.
Tax cuts reduce government revenue which leads to budget deficits and increases the national debt regardless of your opinionThe regulations that separated commercial banking from investment banking.
Banks could write/buy crappy mortgages with those regulations.
Lower taxes and fewer regulations harm the average American? How?
Profits are privatized and risk is socialized
And that only happened after Reagan cut taxes?
How do higher taxes prevent that situation? What's the magic rate? How do you know?
Tax cuts reduce government revenue which leads to budget deficits and increases the national debt regardless of your opinion
Look at your revenue stream. Do you constantly plead with an employer to raise your income because you insist in spending far too much? Why do you place the Government first above the citizens when all Government is about is serving citizens?Tax cuts reduce government revenue which leads to budget deficits and increases the national debt regardless of your opinion
To be blunt with you, we have far too many citizens willing to be taxed more and more and they seem not to care what the Congress spends. Do you happen to recall the vaunted Grace Commission enacted due to Reagan?Tax cuts reduce government revenue which leads to budget deficits and increases the national debt regardless of your opinion
To be blunt with you, we have far too many citizens willing to be taxed more and more and they seem not to care what the Congress spends. Do you happen to recall the vaunted Grace Commission enacted due to Reagan?
Tax cuts reduce government revenue which leads to budget deficits and increases the national debt regardless of your opinion
Tax cuts reduce government revenue which leads to budget deficits and increases the national debt regardless of your opinion
When he was Governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee, to test what you told here, he decided to set up Arkansas to collect cash from the willing to be taxed. He could not find them. They could easily send more money to Arkansas but he learned they actually do not want to pay more.Most are not willing to pay more in taxes but they could not care less what Congress spends, and this is proven each election we have.
First off , Biden didn't cause it. Secondly there were multiple factors involved, COVID , shipping crisis , faster than expected rebound from the crisis and trump policies and the debt explosion that occurred while trump was in office. Experts can tell you the whole story. To get the complete picture you'd have to reach out to a lot of them in their perspective fields.I'm not sure the answer to either. Let's discuss.
Would you agree that those who can't predict inflation do not understand inflation? As I see this, if they understood inflation, they could predict inflation.The inflation was inevitable. Could his spending have exacerbated it? Definitely possible, but this was going to happen.
We had poured (because we pretty much had to) about $11 TRILLION total into markets in response to the Meltdown, and we all knew that it was going to cause inflation down the road. We kept interest rates artificially low for the same reason. Then COVID hit and global supply chains collapsed when global demand exploded coming out of the lockdowns. Then the goddamn Fed was about a year late in addressing the inflation adequately. By that time, the inflation had begun to feed on itself and we were screwed.
It was going to happen. The Fed has done a very good job since then, VERY good, which mitigates how pissed off I am that they waited so damn long.
Inflation could easily remain below 3.0% for 2024, and we could also have very solid growth with it. No one can predict it, though.
No. There are too many conflicting currents that can affect inflation either way. And there is no way to know if and when inflation has gone long enough and strong enough that it begins to feed on itself, which we saw happen. That's an impossible calculation, and you can only observe it after the fact.Would you agree that those who can't predict inflation do not understand inflation? As I see this, if they understood inflation, they could predict inflation.
It seems to me if you are right, they had no need to hear you given you said they agree you are right. Sort of like we all have watches set precisely and I say it is 1 pm and all agree. They already have watches and I gave no new input.Then you'd better contact the financial groups I've provided lectures to and tell them that. They really seemed to agree that I'm right. Better hurry.
Analyzing and acting on this stuff -- practical application -- has been my profession for over 23 years. How about you?
Have you noticed how explaining inflation varies according to who is doing the explaining?No. There are too many conflicting currents that can affect inflation either way. And there is no way to know if and when inflation has gone long enough and strong enough that it begins to feed on itself, which we saw happen. That's an impossible calculation, and you can only observe it after the fact.
