- Moderator
- #1
Just something that's on my mind. We talk about the Rights of man all the time. But rarely do we talk about the Responsibilities of man. What are they?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just something that's on my mind. We talk about the Rights of man all the time. But rarely do we talk about the Responsibilities of man. What are they?
Man, not a manJust something that's on my mind. We talk about the Rights of man all the time. But rarely do we talk about the Responsibilities of man. What are they?
Doesn't that depend on his relationships, Avatar? If you have a beloved, you owe her a duty. Child, duty. Aging parent still alive, duty. Live in a community, duty. Nation, duty.
Just something that's on my mind. We talk about the Rights of man all the time. But rarely do we talk about the Responsibilities of man. What are they?
Man, not a manJust something that's on my mind. We talk about the Rights of man all the time. But rarely do we talk about the Responsibilities of man. What are they?
Doesn't that depend on his relationships, Avatar? If you have a beloved, you owe her a duty. Child, duty. Aging parent still alive, duty. Live in a community, duty. Nation, duty.
Just something that's on my mind. We talk about the Rights of man all the time. But rarely do we talk about the Responsibilities of man. What are they?
very cool question, i wanted to start a thread like this too, you´re been earlier, thanks.
i absolutely agree that this question isn´t foucussed enough in general. As Madeline said, there is this terminology "Duty".
The problem I see is that any named duty could always be sensed as a touch of the rights. If we say "When you take you´re right to doing this, you have in the same time to doing that" will there always be somebody who asks "Why?" and will fight against this rule.
But in general: There can´t be a freedom of will in anyway without taking the responsibility on the other hand. If somebody calls the absolutely free handling of anything and denies the consequences that he´s not trustworthy. Little children who didn´t learn this lesson yet are allowed to do so. But sadly when i watch cash burning banksters, job killing consultants or enviroment polluting company managers i wonder why we allow the most powerful people to act like little children.
It aren´t only the direct consequences of these people which are the biggest problem. When the most powerful class constaintly forces their demand of doing their "free will" and refusing axiomatic the resulting responisbility as well, which example do they give for the rest of the people? A russian word says "The fish stinks from the head". And doesn´t this behaviour contort the term "Freedom"?
A political and socioligical impact like the financial crisis or the oil rig desaster last year in the mexican gulfs demands personal consequences. Not in "firing" somebody with a golden handshake. There have to go somebody from the stinking head into jail. As long es this doesn´t happen, there is no wonder that anybody else takes his freedom to do anything without taking the responsibility as well.
good post Mr. S
but we really can't hang out moral hats on the powers that be
which is all they really are, simply people in positions of power
not leaders of morality
What are the responsibilities of man?
What are the responsibilities of man?
To fuck bitches and get them pregnant.
What are the responsibilities of man?
To fuck bitches and get them pregnant.
I hope you aren't serious here.
Nevermind, it went right past youMan, not a manDoesn't that depend on his relationships, Avatar? If you have a beloved, you owe her a duty. Child, duty. Aging parent still alive, duty. Live in a community, duty. Nation, duty.
Meh, I am sure people can read as what I wrote as including both genders, JB.