Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
General Electric, Boeing, Black Water, Halliburton, Bechtel, Union Carbide, Dow Chemical..just to name a few that promote, participate and profit immensely in war whenever given a chance...
By that logic so does the SEIU, the UAW, and the AFL-CIO.
I didn't know that the unions chose what to make and who to sell it to.
General Electric, Boeing, Black Water, Halliburton, Bechtel, Union Carbide, Dow Chemical..just to name a few that promote, participate and profit immensely in war whenever given a chance...
By that logic so does the SEIU, the UAW, and the AFL-CIO.
I didn't know that the unions chose what to make and who to sell it to.
General Electric, Boeing, Black Water, Halliburton, Bechtel, Union Carbide, Dow Chemical..just to name a few that promote, participate and profit immensely in war whenever given a chance...
Man. You hit that on the head.Corporations wage these wars,for the protection and advancement of corporate interest..
Just don't tell any of these flag waving, brainwashed assholes oK ?
They only want to hear about Freedumb thingies................
Ohhhh OMG OMG Gaga had her nipples enlarged !!!! OMG
WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Idiots............
General Electric, Boeing, Black Water, Halliburton, Bechtel, Union Carbide, Dow Chemical..just to name a few that promote, participate and profit immensely in war whenever given a chance...
By that logic so does the SEIU, the UAW, and the AFL-CIO.
I didn't know that the unions chose what to make and who to sell it to.
Man. You hit that on the head.Corporations wage these wars,for the protection and advancement of corporate interest..
Just don't tell any of these flag waving, brainwashed assholes oK ?
They only want to hear about Freedumb thingies................
Ohhhh OMG OMG Gaga had her nipples enlarged !!!! OMG
WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Idiots............
damn straight he did.amazing how people around here just cant comprehend that though.
General Electric, Boeing, Black Water, Halliburton, Bechtel, Union Carbide, Dow Chemical..just to name a few that promote, participate and profit immensely in war whenever given a chance...
yeah its amazing the lack of research done around here by the official conspiracy theory apologists how they are not aware of any of this.
So was Smedley Butler "amazing", "fucked-up", or "delusional" when he pointed out the profits US corporations made from the "War to End all Wars"?
"Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people – didn't one of them testify before a Senate committee recently that their powder won the war? Or saved the world for democracy? Or something? How did they do in the war?
"They were a patriotic corporation. Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6,000,000 a year. It wasn't much, but the du Ponts managed to get along on it. Now let's look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good. An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent.
"Take one of our little steel companies that patriotically shunted aside the making of rails and girders and bridges to manufacture war materials. Well, their 1910-1914 yearly earnings averaged $6,000,000. Then came the war. And, like loyal citizens, Bethlehem Steel promptly turned to munitions making. Did their profits jump – or did they let Uncle Sam in for a bargain? Well, their 1914-1918 average was $49,000,000 a year!
"Or, let's take United States Steel. The normal earnings during the five-year period prior to the war were $105,000,000 a year. Not bad. Then along came the war and up went the profits. The average yearly profit for the period 1914-1918 was $240,000,000. Not bad."
War is a Racket.
Only amazingly fucked-up delusional slaves argue otherwise.
Princess:So was Smedley Butler "amazing", "fucked-up", or "delusional" when he pointed out the profits US corporations made from the "War to End all Wars"?
"Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people didn't one of them testify before a Senate committee recently that their powder won the war? Or saved the world for democracy? Or something? How did they do in the war?
"They were a patriotic corporation. Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6,000,000 a year. It wasn't much, but the du Ponts managed to get along on it. Now let's look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good. An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent.
"Take one of our little steel companies that patriotically shunted aside the making of rails and girders and bridges to manufacture war materials. Well, their 1910-1914 yearly earnings averaged $6,000,000. Then came the war. And, like loyal citizens, Bethlehem Steel promptly turned to munitions making. Did their profits jump or did they let Uncle Sam in for a bargain? Well, their 1914-1918 average was $49,000,000 a year!
"Or, let's take United States Steel. The normal earnings during the five-year period prior to the war were $105,000,000 a year. Not bad. Then along came the war and up went the profits. The average yearly profit for the period 1914-1918 was $240,000,000. Not bad."
War is a Racket.
Only amazingly fucked-up delusional slaves argue otherwise.
Your cheap over-used stale Marxist rhetoric is fucked up, as are you.
Life is a racket, you dickweed.
It should go without saying that suppliers of war materiel make money in a capitalist system when they produce their product and when there is a demand for that product.
It is only fucking imbecile Marxist school girls like you who worry over that fact: "Oh nosies. Big bad evil Haliburton is making money! Sound the alarums, sirrah!"
The fact that manufacturers of products needed for war make money providing that product hardly equates with your facially retarded proposition that the manufacturers are the ones fomenting war, you imbecile.
Would life be better in this world if there was no war? In some ways, sure. In other ways, obviously not. For without war, nobody stops a fucking Hitler from seizing Poland, etc. Without war, we still might be expected to have slavery right here in the United States. Without war, we wouldn't BE the United State, but just some over the puddle colony of Great Britain.
I realize that shitholes like you live in that Utopian fantasy world which you idiots construct inside your pin-heads. But outside of your fantasy Utopia, war is more complicated than your two-dimensional shallow "thinking." And since wars are not going to cease to exist, and you wouldn't be safe if they could somehow be successfully prevented, the question would arise: given your hatred of capitalism, how the fuck do YOU propose that we supply our fighting forces with uniforms, guns, bullets, missiles, aircraft, bombs, tanks, shells, etc., etc., etc.?
Princess:So was Smedley Butler "amazing", "fucked-up", or "delusional" when he pointed out the profits US corporations made from the "War to End all Wars"?
"Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people didn't one of them testify before a Senate committee recently that their powder won the war? Or saved the world for democracy? Or something? How did they do in the war?
"They were a patriotic corporation. Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6,000,000 a year. It wasn't much, but the du Ponts managed to get along on it. Now let's look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good. An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent.
"Take one of our little steel companies that patriotically shunted aside the making of rails and girders and bridges to manufacture war materials. Well, their 1910-1914 yearly earnings averaged $6,000,000. Then came the war. And, like loyal citizens, Bethlehem Steel promptly turned to munitions making. Did their profits jump or did they let Uncle Sam in for a bargain? Well, their 1914-1918 average was $49,000,000 a year!
"Or, let's take United States Steel. The normal earnings during the five-year period prior to the war were $105,000,000 a year. Not bad. Then along came the war and up went the profits. The average yearly profit for the period 1914-1918 was $240,000,000. Not bad."
War is a Racket.
Only amazingly fucked-up delusional slaves argue otherwise.
Your cheap over-used stale Marxist rhetoric is fucked up, as are you.
Life is a racket, you dickweed.
It should go without saying that suppliers of war materiel make money in a capitalist system when they produce their product and when there is a demand for that product.
It is only fucking imbecile Marxist school girls like you who worry over that fact: "Oh nosies. Big bad evil Haliburton is making money! Sound the alarums, sirrah!"
The fact that manufacturers of products needed for war make money providing that product hardly equates with your facially retarded proposition that the manufacturers are the ones fomenting war, you imbecile.
Would life be better in this world if there was no war? In some ways, sure. In other ways, obviously not. For without war, nobody stops a fucking Hitler from seizing Poland, etc. Without war, we still might be expected to have slavery right here in the United States. Without war, we wouldn't BE the United State, but just some over the puddle colony of Great Britain.
I realize that shitholes like you live in that Utopian fantasy world which you idiots construct inside your pin-heads. But outside of your fantasy Utopia, war is more complicated than your two-dimensional shallow "thinking." And since wars are not going to cease to exist, and you wouldn't be safe if they could somehow be successfully prevented, the question would arise: given your hatred of capitalism, how the fuck do YOU propose that we supply our fighting forces with uniforms, guns, bullets, missiles, aircraft, bombs, tanks, shells, etc., etc., etc.?
Are you fucked-up or a "dickweed capitalist" or what...
Was Smedley Butler a stale school girl or Marxist imbecile?
Hitler would never have come to power without war.
Chattel slavery could have been taxed into extinction in this country between Valley Forge and Cold Harbor.
Canada achieved its independence without war.
Maybe you should limit your commentary to things you have some expertise in...like stealing land and water in Palestine.
Actually, Golda, the issue is all Smedley all the time, waxing poetic on one large patriotic nut:Princess:Your cheap over-used stale Marxist rhetoric is fucked up, as are you.
Life is a racket, you dickweed.
It should go without saying that suppliers of war materiel make money in a capitalist system when they produce their product and when there is a demand for that product.
It is only fucking imbecile Marxist school girls like you who worry over that fact: "Oh nosies. Big bad evil Haliburton is making money! Sound the alarums, sirrah!"
The fact that manufacturers of products needed for war make money providing that product hardly equates with your facially retarded proposition that the manufacturers are the ones fomenting war, you imbecile.
Would life be better in this world if there was no war? In some ways, sure. In other ways, obviously not. For without war, nobody stops a fucking Hitler from seizing Poland, etc. Without war, we still might be expected to have slavery right here in the United States. Without war, we wouldn't BE the United State, but just some over the puddle colony of Great Britain.
I realize that shitholes like you live in that Utopian fantasy world which you idiots construct inside your pin-heads. But outside of your fantasy Utopia, war is more complicated than your two-dimensional shallow "thinking." And since wars are not going to cease to exist, and you wouldn't be safe if they could somehow be successfully prevented, the question would arise: given your hatred of capitalism, how the fuck do YOU propose that we supply our fighting forces with uniforms, guns, bullets, missiles, aircraft, bombs, tanks, shells, etc., etc., etc.?
Are you fucked-up or a "dickweed capitalist" or what...
Was Smedley Butler a stale school girl or Marxist imbecile?
Hitler would never have come to power without war.
Chattel slavery could have been taxed into extinction in this country between Valley Forge and Cold Harbor.
Canada achieved its independence without war.
Maybe you should limit your commentary to things you have some expertise in...like stealing land and water in Palestine.
Georgieporgie kissd the girls and made them puke.
Listen up, shit-for-brains. The issue is not Smedley. The issue is your own inability to think.
I asked you questions, and you can't respond. You are indeed just a fucking imbecile.
Without your college-girl Marxist rhetoric to prop you up, little miss, you have no ability to post a coherent thought. Don't kid yourself. It shows.
And Hitler CAME to power, asshole, without war. It's what he did once he came to power that needs to be considered. Just ask Poland. But in your sub-moron Utopian imagination, when Hitler crossed the border, there would be no war to stop him.
You are a fucking joke. A bad joke. Not funny. But still, just a joke.
General Electric, Boeing, Black Water, Halliburton, Bechtel, Union Carbide, Dow Chemical..just to name a few that promote, participate and profit immensely in war whenever given a chance...
yeah its amazing the lack of research done around here by the official conspiracy theory apologists how they are not aware of any of this.
and please explain why this is wrong. you are saying they should LOSE money??
By the way, Hitler came to power because of a war his country lost.
No war?
No Hitler.
Kinda like Palestine and the illegal occupation.
Treaty entanglements I'm not completely clear on apparently made WWI inevitable for many European nations; however, I suspect there were investment bankers in London, New York, and Berlin doing their part to instigate a conflict they stood to profit from regardless of who "won" or "lost" on the battlefield.By the way, Hitler came to power because of a war his country lost.
No war?
No Hitler.
Kinda like Palestine and the illegal occupation.
Exactly whose fault is it that Germany was in that War?
WE ATTACKED THEM FIRST.
Al Qaeda did not attack us on 9-11 because of our freedom and Christian religion. Sound innocent, but we are not. Victims of 9-11 are a part of the U.S. government and not innocent by-standers. We are the government and our government policies was attacked and wherever we are and our allies. We are not the only free and Christian religious country, so why are we and our allies the only ones attacked? Hannity is just and FOXNEWS fool spewing false information because there are those village idiots that want to hear that Al Qaeda attacked us first. Ignorance is not bliss. The Gulf War came long before 9-11 and was an attack against Muslims and the sole cause of the 9-11 attack. The mere U.S. presence on Islamic land it an attack on Muslims. (Koran) Opposition to the Mosque is another attack on Muslims and we will suffer the consequences for that tragedy. We keep encouraging radical Muslims to attack us and keep attacking us. I refuse to use the word terrorist when speaking of radical Muslims. There are no more terrorist than we are.
I dont see how Hannity can get away with a bold face lie like this with a straight face and no one corrects him.
We attacked them first and we caused 9-11.
The Persian Gulf War (August 2, 1990 February 28, 1991), commonly referred to as simply the Gulf War, was a war waged by a U.N.-authorized coalition force from thirty-four nations led by the United States and United Kingdom, against Iraq.
Gulf War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
wow, rdean said something i can agree withWE ATTACKED THEM FIRST.
Al Qaeda did not attack us on 9-11 because of our freedom and Christian religion. Sound innocent, but we are not. Victims of 9-11 are a part of the U.S. government and not innocent by-standers. We are the government and our government policies was attacked and wherever we are and our allies. We are not the only free and Christian religious country, so why are we and our allies the only ones attacked? Hannity is just and FOXNEWS fool spewing false information because there are those village idiots that want to hear that Al Qaeda attacked us first. Ignorance is not bliss. The Gulf War came long before 9-11 and was an attack against Muslims and the sole cause of the 9-11 attack. The mere U.S. presence on Islamic land it an attack on Muslims. (Koran) Opposition to the Mosque is another attack on Muslims and we will suffer the consequences for that tragedy. We keep encouraging radical Muslims to attack us and keep attacking us. I refuse to use the word terrorist when speaking of radical Muslims. There are no more terrorist than we are.
I dont see how Hannity can get away with a bold face lie like this with a straight face and no one corrects him.
We attacked them first and we caused 9-11.
The Persian Gulf War (August 2, 1990 February 28, 1991), commonly referred to as simply the Gulf War, was a war waged by a U.N.-authorized coalition force from thirty-four nations led by the United States and United Kingdom, against Iraq.
Gulf War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Iraq attacked Kuwait. Other Middle Eastern Countries asked for our help to drive Iraq out of Kuwait. That pissed Bin Laden off. But helping Kuwait at their request doesn't make us responsible in any way, shape of form for 9/11. We did the right thing. 9/11 happened because Bin Laden was and is a fuckwad. It's just that simple.
wow, rdean said something i can agree withWE ATTACKED THEM FIRST.
Al Qaeda did not attack us on 9-11 because of our freedom and Christian religion. Sound innocent, but we are not. Victims of 9-11 are a part of the U.S. government and not innocent by-standers. We are the government and our government policies was attacked and wherever we are and our allies. We are not the only free and Christian religious country, so why are we and our allies the only ones attacked? Hannity is just and FOXNEWS fool spewing false information because there are those village idiots that want to hear that Al Qaeda attacked us first. Ignorance is not bliss. The Gulf War came long before 9-11 and was an attack against Muslims and the sole cause of the 9-11 attack. The mere U.S. presence on Islamic land it an attack on Muslims. (Koran) Opposition to the Mosque is another attack on Muslims and we will suffer the consequences for that tragedy. We keep encouraging radical Muslims to attack us and keep attacking us. I refuse to use the word terrorist when speaking of radical Muslims. There are no more terrorist than we are.
I dont see how Hannity can get away with a bold face lie like this with a straight face and no one corrects him.
We attacked them first and we caused 9-11.
The Persian Gulf War (August 2, 1990 February 28, 1991), commonly referred to as simply the Gulf War, was a war waged by a U.N.-authorized coalition force from thirty-four nations led by the United States and United Kingdom, against Iraq.
Gulf War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Iraq attacked Kuwait. Other Middle Eastern Countries asked for our help to drive Iraq out of Kuwait. That pissed Bin Laden off. But helping Kuwait at their request doesn't make us responsible in any way, shape of form for 9/11. We did the right thing. 9/11 happened because Bin Laden was and is a fuckwad. It's just that simple.
ok, who are you and what have you done with the REAL rdean
