Wasserman Scultz can't tell the Difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat!

[MisterBeale]

Dunno if it was Chrissy shilling for Hillary or he just committed, as Rush would say, a random act of journalism. Regardless, the head of the Dimocrat National Committee is a complete laughing stock while their candidate continues to slide in polls. Very nervous dims hoping the despised one can reverse her momentum.

Somewhere in their hierarchy someone's searching for that dusty binder labeled: Plan B.

 

[Pogo]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

There's nothing to "spin" -- have you ever watched Chris Matthews? He doesn't do interviews. He does monologues with question marks that can't be answered because he's already talking over the second word of your response.

Everything that's wrong with television dumb-down is encapsulated in that spittle dripping out the side of his mouth. Superficial bullshit.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Democrats are closer to social democracy for their belief = mixed economy of private and public sector. Most of europe is like this and in fact most first world countries.

Socialist state = nationalized control economy that normally doesn't give its people much choice within it. Think of Cuba...

My problem with the democrats is their identity politics and social engineering they do to our social "mindset". They won't be truly "socialistic" until they start nationalizing everything and micromanaging the economy as socialism is a economic system.

 

[ScienceRocks]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

The majority of voters are registered as independent, it's like they don't exist to either of the 2 parties.

Yep, both parties are now totally controlled by their bases.

.

No, both parties are controlled by the nuts of society and these nutzs are foam spitting extremist. It is really sicking to witness.

 

[peach174]

She is awful. But..it is a weird question. It's like asking "What's the difference between a ladder and a pineapple."

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

Yes he does
Socialists In Congress Revealed

 

[boedicca]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

There's nothing to "spin" -- have you ever watched Chris Matthews? He doesn't do interviews. He does monologues with question marks that can't be answered because he's already talking over the second word of your response.

Everything that's wrong with television dumb-down is encapsulated in that spittle dripping out the side of his mouth. Superficial bullshit.

Debbie did his show. If she wasn't up for handling the questioning, she shouldn't have put herself in that position.

But it really was GRAND!

We need more such interviews and spectacles featuring her. Between her and Hillary, the nation is getting a good idea what the Dems are all about.

 

[Mac1958]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

The majority of voters are registered as independent, it's like they don't exist to either of the 2 parties.

Yep, both parties are now totally controlled by their bases.

.

Bullshit.
Are you suggesting the same "base" that supports Jeb Bush (biggest fundraiser to date) also supports Donald Trump (currently polling #1)? What base would that be? And does the same base control Scott Walker (in top 3) or George Pataki?

I look at the GOP "base" as the section of the party with the most energy and influence, for better or worse.

Right now, that's the group that identifies most with the Tea Party.

.

 

[Uncensored2008]

In todays world. there is no difference.

 

[Pogo]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

There's nothing to "spin" -- have you ever watched Chris Matthews? He doesn't do interviews. He does monologues with question marks that can't be answered because he's already talking over the second word of your response.

Everything that's wrong with television dumb-down is encapsulated in that spittle dripping out the side of his mouth. Superficial bullshit.

Debbie did his show. If she wasn't up for handling the questioning, she shouldn't have put herself in that position.

But it really was GRAND!

We need more such interviews and spectacles featuring her. Between her and Hillary, the nation is getting a good idea what the Dems are all about.

I don't think you do Matthews to "handle the questions". Even Superman couldn't do that using his Kryptonic powers of Super-Speech. You do it for the same reason you do any other TV show -- face time. You prolly put one good sound bite together, practice saying it real fast before the red light (symbolic, that) goes on, and then hope to blurt it out real quick when a fly lands in his eye. That's about all you can hope for.

I dunno Boe, if you're looking for intelligent life on a TV screen.....

Pop quiz: what's the difference between liberalism and conservatism? You have 0.4 seconds... GO. Time's up.

 

[Meathead]

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

Of course he does. That is sort of the point of this thread.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Bernie Sanders might be a Socialist, but does he support nationalizing all industry/business in the nation?

Does he support abolishing all free enterprise? Does he support eliminating the private sector of the economy?

 

[Uncensored2008]

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

He should have asked if Karl Marx gives her a thrill up her leg?

 

[Carla_Danger]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

There's nothing to "spin" -- have you ever watched Chris Matthews? He doesn't do interviews. He does monologues with question marks that can't be answered because he's already talking over the second word of your response.

Everything that's wrong with television dumb-down is encapsulated in that spittle dripping out the side of his mouth. Superficial bullshit.

Debbie did his show. If she wasn't up for handling the questioning, she shouldn't have put herself in that position.

But it really was GRAND!

We need more such interviews and spectacles featuring her. Between her and Hillary, the nation is getting a good idea what the Dems are all about.

I'm so glad you finally said that! LOL!

 

[Pogo]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

There's nothing to "spin" -- have you ever watched Chris Matthews? He doesn't do interviews. He does monologues with question marks that can't be answered because he's already talking over the second word of your response.

Everything that's wrong with television dumb-down is encapsulated in that spittle dripping out the side of his mouth. Superficial bullshit.

Debbie did his show. If she wasn't up for handling the questioning, she shouldn't have put herself in that position.

But it really was GRAND!

We need more such interviews and spectacles featuring her. Between her and Hillary, the nation is getting a good idea what the Dems are all about.

I'm so glad you finally said that! LOL!

Sarah should have done that interview with Chris Matthews. He wouldn't have given her time to dig.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm so glad you finally said that! LOL!

You can tell when the demagogue scum are in full panic; they start spewing their hate memes against Palin.

Uppity women that she is, not knowing her place....


Oh, and if you want to see a total fucking retard, check out this moron...

 

[depotoo]

Personally I think their plan b has actually been plan a. This didn't just randomly happen.

Dunno if it was Chrissy shilling for Hillary or he just committed, as Rush would say, a random act of journalism. Regardless, the head of the Dimocrat National Committee is a complete laughing stock while their candidate continues to slide in polls. Very nervous dims hoping the despised one can reverse her momentum.

Somewhere in their hierarchy someone's searching for that dusty binder labeled:
Plan B.

 

[peach174]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

There's nothing to "spin" -- have you ever watched Chris Matthews? He doesn't do interviews. He does monologues with question marks that can't be answered because he's already talking over the second word of your response.

Everything that's wrong with television dumb-down is encapsulated in that spittle dripping out the side of his mouth. Superficial bullshit.

Debbie did his show. If she wasn't up for handling the questioning, she shouldn't have put herself in that position.

But it really was GRAND!

We need more such interviews and spectacles featuring her. Between her and Hillary, the nation is getting a good idea what the Dems are all about.

I'm so glad you finally said that! LOL!

While we actually have a Vice President that says:

 

[SassyIrishLass]

 

[The Rabbi]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

The majority of voters are registered as independent, it's like they don't exist to either of the 2 parties.

Yep, both parties are now totally controlled by their bases.

.

Bullshit.
Are you suggesting the same "base" that supports Jeb Bush (biggest fundraiser to date) also supports Donald Trump (currently polling #1)? What base would that be? And does the same base control Scott Walker (in top 3) or George Pataki?

I look at the GOP "base" as the section of the party with the most energy and influence, for better or worse.

Right now, that's the group that identifies most with the Tea Party.

.

The Tea Party is supporting Jeb Bush (top fundraiser so far)? And the TP clearly does not have much influence. If they did Boehner would be gone.

 

[LoneLaugher]

She is awful. But..it is a weird question. It's like asking "What's the difference between a ladder and a pineapple."

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

Yes he does
Socialists In Congress Revealed

Fail.