Wasserman Scultz can't tell the Difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat!

[boedicca]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

Heard it this morning on Glen Beck. She is pathetic.

 

[Mac1958]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

.

 

[peach174]

I watched that and was laughing all the way through it.
Yesterday on Morning Joe was funny to watch too. All of them being speechless over what the people in New Jersey was saying about Trump, including Joe.

It's refreshing to see Bernie Sanders being honest about being a Socialist.
The rest of them hide behind the words of Liberal or Progressive.

 

[peach174]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

.

The majority of voters are registered as independent, it's like they don't exist to either of the 2 parties.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Ramen Noodlehead isn't too bright

 

[Mac1958]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

The majority of voters are registered as independent, it's like they don't exist to either of the 2 parties.

Yep, both parties are now totally controlled by their bases.

.

 

[LoneLaugher]

She is awful. But..it is a weird question. It's like asking "What's the difference between a ladder and a pineapple."

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

 

[The Rabbi]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

The majority of voters are registered as independent, it's like they don't exist to either of the 2 parties.

Yep, both parties are now totally controlled by their bases.

.

Bullshit.
Are you suggesting the same "base" that supports Jeb Bush (biggest fundraiser to date) also supports Donald Trump (currently polling #1)? What base would that be? And does the same base control Scott Walker (in top 3) or George Pataki?

 

[boedicca]

I think she's GREAT! She should be on TV everyday through the entire election cycle!

 

[The Rabbi]

She is awful. But..it is a weird question. It's like asking "What's the difference between a ladder and a pineapple."

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

He is a self proclaimed Socialist. He never belonged to the Democratic Party.

 

[depotoo]

Possibly because they have become synonymous...

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

 

[LoneLaugher]

She is awful. But..it is a weird question. It's like asking "What's the difference between a ladder and a pineapple."

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

He is a self proclaimed Socialist. He never belonged to the Democratic Party.

You just said nothing.

 

[The Rabbi]

She is awful. But..it is a weird question. It's like asking "What's the difference between a ladder and a pineapple."

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

He is a self proclaimed Socialist. He never belonged to the Democratic Party.

You just said nothing.

LOL. Your post was content free.

 

[Pogo]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

 

[Pogo]

She is awful. But..it is a weird question. It's like asking "What's the difference between a ladder and a pineapple."

Bernie doesn't belong to the Socialist party. Does he?

He is a self proclaimed Socialist. He never belonged to the Democratic Party.

You just said nothing.

LOL. Your post was content free.

I keep asking you this and I keep not getting an answer ---- why do you have Nathan Bedford Forrest in your avatar? What's the statement there?

 

[blastoff]

Dunno if it was Chrissy shilling for Hillary or he just committed, as Rush would say, a random act of journalism. Regardless, the head of the Dimocrat National Committee is a complete laughing stock while their candidate continues to slide in polls. Very nervous dims hoping the despised one can reverse her momentum.

Somewhere in their hierarchy someone's searching for that dusty binder labeled:
Plan B.

 

[MisterBeale]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

.

That might be true, but the candidate they are choosing to represent them is further the right on almost every issue except social policy issues like gay marriage and abortion than most candidates in the Republican party. She just won't tell anyone that.

 

[boedicca]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.

Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

 

[Pogo]

It's pretty clear that the question will soon be "what's the difference between a social democrat and a socialist"?

The progressives are essentially social democrats, looking to countries like Sweden & Germany as role models, so their task is to draw a distinct line between that and a more pure socialism. That can probably be done.

The Democrats have moved left, the Republicans have moved right, and the rest of us are standing in the gaping hole.

.

That might be true, but the candidate they are choosing to represent them is further the right on almost every issue except social policy issues like gay marriage and abortion than most candidates in the Republican party. She just won't tell anyone that.

I don't think that's true. Both party (singular intentional) have moved to the right. If you want to pretend they're different parties, then we have a right-wing party and a center-right party. Anything else has all the impact of an extra on a movie set.