Was Viktor Shokin actually corrupt? The media and Biden say yes but where is the evidence?

Everyone points to the rest of the world and claims that Biden was essentially the worlds spokesperson as appointed by Obama.

Problem is where is the evidence he was actually corrupt? According to recent news reports the man has NEVER been charged with anything related to corruption. Nor has he any previous convictions along those lines.

He was investigating Burisma and freezing their assets which is the company Bidens son worked for. That is when the whole world supposedly realized he was corrupt.

So, where is the evidence of corruption? And no, so and so says is not evidence. So list the actual people/companies that accused him of bribing or extorting from them. REAL ACCUSATIONS not post Biden quid pro quo cover up accusations ment to give Sleepy Joe cover.


This should be a simple task if in fact he is/was corrupt.

Why are you promoting Russian propaganda about Shokin? SHOKIN WAS FIRED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTING BURISMA.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal

If you really did want to find out the truth, you could have googled it too.

"SHOKIN WAS FIRED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTING BURISMA."

Funny you said that. Shortly after he was fired, investigation into Burisma was officially closed.
Actually, it was closed because the Prosecutor General's office, led by Shokin's replacement, finished the case by collecting millions in back taxes from Burisma's owner. Something Shokin wouldn't do.

Actually it was not. Investigation was closed by Shokin's successor.
And Shokin was fired AFTER he froze their assets during the investigation.

he resigned u dumbass.
 
Everyone points to the rest of the world and claims that Biden was essentially the worlds spokesperson as appointed by Obama.

Problem is where is the evidence he was actually corrupt? According to recent news reports the man has NEVER been charged with anything related to corruption. Nor has he any previous convictions along those lines.

He was investigating Burisma and freezing their assets which is the company Bidens son worked for. That is when the whole world supposedly realized he was corrupt.

So, where is the evidence of corruption? And no, so and so says is not evidence. So list the actual people/companies that accused him of bribing or extorting from them. REAL ACCUSATIONS not post Biden quid pro quo cover up accusations ment to give Sleepy Joe cover.


This should be a simple task if in fact he is/was corrupt.

Why are you promoting Russian propaganda about Shokin? SHOKIN WAS FIRED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTING BURISMA.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal

If you really did want to find out the truth, you could have googled it too.

"SHOKIN WAS FIRED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTING BURISMA."

Funny you said that. Shortly after he was fired, investigation into Burisma was officially closed.
Actually, it was closed because the Prosecutor General's office, led by Shokin's replacement, finished the case by collecting millions in back taxes from Burisma's owner. Something Shokin wouldn't do.

Actually it was not. Investigation was closed by Shokin's successor.
And Shokin was fired AFTER he froze their assets during the investigation.

Bullshit. Shokin was fired after he did NOTHING. Why do you keep repeating Russian propaganda? Everything to do with Russia and the Ukraine that you are parrotting, is Russian propaganda, and you'd know that if you simply used google.
 
Everyone points to the rest of the world and claims that Biden was essentially the worlds spokesperson as appointed by Obama.

Problem is where is the evidence he was actually corrupt? According to recent news reports the man has NEVER been charged with anything related to corruption. Nor has he any previous convictions along those lines.

He was investigating Burisma and freezing their assets which is the company Bidens son worked for. That is when the whole world supposedly realized he was corrupt.

So, where is the evidence of corruption? And no, so and so says is not evidence. So list the actual people/companies that accused him of bribing or extorting from them. REAL ACCUSATIONS not post Biden quid pro quo cover up accusations ment to give Sleepy Joe cover.


This should be a simple task if in fact he is/was corrupt.

Why are you promoting Russian propaganda about Shokin? SHOKIN WAS FIRED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTING BURISMA.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal

If you really did want to find out the truth, you could have googled it too.

"SHOKIN WAS FIRED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTING BURISMA."

Funny you said that. Shortly after he was fired, investigation into Burisma was officially closed.
Actually, it was closed because the Prosecutor General's office, led by Shokin's replacement, finished the case by collecting millions in back taxes from Burisma's owner. Something Shokin wouldn't do.

Actually it was not. Investigation was closed by Shokin's successor.
That's who I was talking about when I said, "Shokin's replacement."
 
And Shokin was fired AFTER he froze their assets during the investigation.

According to who?

Shokin?

Putin?

Rudy the Ghoul?

Post a link
It's in the video of the op ya tool. Watch it or keep your head in the sand....your choice
Shokin’s office was shaking down Burisma for bribes. That’s how these crooks work. Open an “investigation”, get paid. Move on.
Link to Burisma claiming he was extorting them?
 
And Shokin was fired AFTER he froze their assets during the investigation.

According to who?

Shokin?

Putin?

Rudy the Ghoul?

Post a link
It's in the video of the op ya tool. Watch it or keep your head in the sand....your choice
Shokin’s office was shaking down Burisma for bribes. That’s how these crooks work. Open an “investigation”, get paid. Move on.
Link to Burisma claiming he was extorting them?

No one at Burisma is going to admit to it. Paying bribes is a crime. It was the belief of our State Dept. based on how the court case in England collapsed and Ukrainian lawyers sent a letter to Burisma’s owner saying everything is cool.
 
And Shokin was fired AFTER he froze their assets during the investigation.

According to who?

Shokin?

Putin?

Rudy the Ghoul?

Post a link
It's in the video of the op ya tool. Watch it or keep your head in the sand....your choice
Shokin’s office was shaking down Burisma for bribes. That’s how these crooks work. Open an “investigation”, get paid. Move on.
Link to Burisma claiming he was extorting them?

No one at Burisma is going to admit to it. Paying bribes is a crime. It was the belief of our State Dept. based on how the court case in England collapsed and Ukrainian lawyers sent a letter to Burisma’s owner saying everything is cool.
So it's a "hunch"

We're going to hang our political hats and future presidents on a bunch?

You're kidding right?
 
Head in the sand it is...enjoy your stay

So you're going to believe the Trump lies...with no actual proof and in the face of evidence to the contrary...because you want to


Oh...
I am going off the research that I have done myself by googling and you tubing every bit of info I can. Has NOTHING to do with Trumps statements or speeches. I know you won't believe that but it is the truth
 
According to who?

Shokin?

Putin?

Rudy the Ghoul?

Post a link
It's in the video of the op ya tool. Watch it or keep your head in the sand....your choice
Shokin’s office was shaking down Burisma for bribes. That’s how these crooks work. Open an “investigation”, get paid. Move on.
Link to Burisma claiming he was extorting them?

No one at Burisma is going to admit to it. Paying bribes is a crime. It was the belief of our State Dept. based on how the court case in England collapsed and Ukrainian lawyers sent a letter to Burisma’s owner saying everything is cool.
So it's a "hunch"

We're going to hang our political hats and future presidents on a bunch?

You're kidding right?

Who is hanging what?

There’s more to Shokin. He was living large, larger than a government employee would. His underlings were found to have wads of cash and diamonds in their houses as well as Shokin’s passport. Guess who ended the investigation into his underlines? That’s right. Shokin.

Even if everyone is wrong about Shokin, the fact remains that the push to oust him came from career state dept officials, not Biden. That’s awfully exculpatory. Wouldn’t you say?

Y’all are willing to torpedo Biden’s candidacy on a hunch. Is there a double standard?
 
It's in the video of the op ya tool. Watch it or keep your head in the sand....your choice
Shokin’s office was shaking down Burisma for bribes. That’s how these crooks work. Open an “investigation”, get paid. Move on.
Link to Burisma claiming he was extorting them?

No one at Burisma is going to admit to it. Paying bribes is a crime. It was the belief of our State Dept. based on how the court case in England collapsed and Ukrainian lawyers sent a letter to Burisma’s owner saying everything is cool.
So it's a "hunch"

We're going to hang our political hats and future presidents on a bunch?

You're kidding right?

Who is hanging what?

There’s more to Shokin. He was living large, larger than a government employee would. His underlings were found to have wads of cash and diamonds in their houses as well as Shokin’s passport. Guess who ended the investigation into his underlines? That’s right. Shokin.

Even if everyone is wrong about Shokin, the fact remains that the push to oust him came from career state dept officials, not Biden. That’s awfully exculpatory. Wouldn’t you say?

Y’all are willing to torpedo Biden’s candidacy on a hunch. Is there a double standard?
I heard he lived a modest life.

This is why you need proof. He said she said proves nothing.
 
Shokin’s office was shaking down Burisma for bribes. That’s how these crooks work. Open an “investigation”, get paid. Move on.
Link to Burisma claiming he was extorting them?

No one at Burisma is going to admit to it. Paying bribes is a crime. It was the belief of our State Dept. based on how the court case in England collapsed and Ukrainian lawyers sent a letter to Burisma’s owner saying everything is cool.
So it's a "hunch"

We're going to hang our political hats and future presidents on a bunch?

You're kidding right?

Who is hanging what?

There’s more to Shokin. He was living large, larger than a government employee would. His underlings were found to have wads of cash and diamonds in their houses as well as Shokin’s passport. Guess who ended the investigation into his underlines? That’s right. Shokin.

Even if everyone is wrong about Shokin, the fact remains that the push to oust him came from career state dept officials, not Biden. That’s awfully exculpatory. Wouldn’t you say?

Y’all are willing to torpedo Biden’s candidacy on a hunch. Is there a double standard?
I heard he lived a modest life.

This is why you need proof. He said she said proves nothing.
Who did you hear he lived a modest life?

It was part of George Kent’s testimony under oath.
 
Link to Burisma claiming he was extorting them?

No one at Burisma is going to admit to it. Paying bribes is a crime. It was the belief of our State Dept. based on how the court case in England collapsed and Ukrainian lawyers sent a letter to Burisma’s owner saying everything is cool.
So it's a "hunch"

We're going to hang our political hats and future presidents on a bunch?

You're kidding right?

Who is hanging what?

There’s more to Shokin. He was living large, larger than a government employee would. His underlings were found to have wads of cash and diamonds in their houses as well as Shokin’s passport. Guess who ended the investigation into his underlines? That’s right. Shokin.

Even if everyone is wrong about Shokin, the fact remains that the push to oust him came from career state dept officials, not Biden. That’s awfully exculpatory. Wouldn’t you say?

Y’all are willing to torpedo Biden’s candidacy on a hunch. Is there a double standard?
I heard he lived a modest life.

This is why you need proof. He said she said proves nothing.
Who did you hear he lived a modest life?

It was part of George Kent’s testimony under oath.
And do you believe all testimony under oath? Our current investigations are nothing more than hardcore partisan bullshit. Nothing will come from any of them.
Personally I don't believe a fucking word out of Washington and only half of what I hear in the news.
 
Everyone points to the rest of the world and claims that Biden was essentially the worlds spokesperson as appointed by Obama.

Problem is where is the evidence he was actually corrupt? According to recent news reports the man has NEVER been charged with anything related to corruption. Nor has he any previous convictions along those lines.

He was investigating Burisma and freezing their assets which is the company Bidens son worked for. That is when the whole world supposedly realized he was corrupt.

So, where is the evidence of corruption? And no, so and so says is not evidence. So list the actual people/companies that accused him of bribing or extorting from them. REAL ACCUSATIONS not post Biden quid pro quo cover up accusations ment to give Sleepy Joe cover.


This should be a simple task if in fact he is/was corrupt.
A]

Well lets take your claims point by point.

Where is the evidence? Since when do Trumpkins like yourself care about evidence. Nothing has stopped Trumpkins and Trump from claiming that Joe Biden is corrupt despite absolutely no evidence to support that claim.

I will point out that Joe Biden has not been charged with anything at all. Nor does he have any previous convictions. Doesn't stop Trump and his loyal Trumpettes from claiming that Biden is corrupt.

He was investigating Burisma and freezing their assets which is the company Bidens son worked for

Where is the evidence that Shokin was doing any such thing? If you are going to demand evidence for Shokin- then you should be providing evidence for your claims.

So what is the evidence that Shokin was corrupt- or merely inefficient. I really don't know. I do know who was claiming that Shokin was derelict in his duties and needed to go.
Who were they?
a) The United States government. As you heard in testimony, the State Department had concluded that Shokin was both corrupt and derelict in his duties.
b) Ukraine's deputy prosecutor: The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal
reformist deputy chief prosecutor when a witness came forward with intelligence that would change the course of everything.

The witness, a sand producer in the Kiev region, complained of men extorting hundreds of thousands of dollars. It took a while to persuade the man to give evidence. But when he did, and the investigation began, the trail led to two of the country’s highest-placed prosecutors.


A search of the men’s apartments revealed a scene that looked like a comic heist: bags full of cash, diamonds and other precious stones. But that was not the only incriminating evidence. Documents seized at the time indicated the men appeared to have a connection to the top prosecutor in the land, Viktor Shokin.
Police found copies of Shokin’s passports, property registration certificates and even his licence to carry firearms. One of the two men, it transpired, was Shokin’s former driver who had subsequently climbed the ranks behind his boss.


For Sakvarelidze, there were clear suspicions the two men may have been carrying out the business of the chief. But his attempts to investigate were frustrated. Soon, he faced a corruption investigation himself. At loggerheads with Shokin, he was pushed out of his job within the year.

c) The Ukrainian people- By the time Joe Biden arrived in Kiev in December 2015 to issue his infamous ultimatum, Shokin had lost the support of all but 3.5 per cent of Ukrainians.

d) Republican Rob Portman
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

e) The European Union
Subscribe to read | Financial Times

EU diplomats working on Ukraine at the time have, however, told the FT that they were looking for ways to persuade Kiev to remove Mr Shokin well before Mr Biden entered the picture. The push for Mr Shokin’s removal was part of an international effort to bolster Ukraine’s institutions following Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the armed conflict in the eastern part of the country. “All of us were really pushing [former Ukrainian president Petro] Poroshenko that he needs to do something, because the prosecutor was not following any of the corruption issues. He was really bad news,” said an EU diplomat involved in the discussions. “It was Biden who finally came in [and triggered it]. Biden was the most vocal, as the US usually is. But we were all literally complaining about the prosecutor.”
 
Biden could easily be exonerated of wrong doing by simply providing evidence that the man he targeted was corrupt.

LOL- do you really think that would stop Trump from claiming Biden is corrupt?

Or would stop the Trumpettes from claiming Biden is corrupt?

Biden was implementing American foriegn policy. And doesn't need to be exonerated of anything.

Stop being a hypocrite and judge Biden by the same standards you insist we judge Shokin.

Where is the evidence of any wrong doing by Biden?
 

Forum List

Back
Top