Wanna Know Why Trump Was Elected?

Black flag-
Iran Nuclear Chief Says Uranium Stockpile Reaches 950 Tons
The chief of Iran's nuclear agency says the country's effort to acquire uranium has resulted in a stockpile of as much as 950 tons.

Ali Akbar Salehi, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, tells state TV on Wednesday that Iran has imported some 400 tons of the stuff since the 2015 landmark nuclear deal with Western powers, bringing its stockpile to between 900 and 950 tons — up from 500 tons.
Where is their enriched uranium? All gone. But might be coming back now if our former European allies fail to keep the deal in place.
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
 
I don’t know why he wouldn’t be doing just that.
Hopefully our former allies can maintain the terms of the deal without the dotard.



Am I reading correctly, that this is what you support?

This is what Iran had earlier dealings with:
Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.

Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism
The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.
Well Trump stopped resisting them in Syria so they’re pretty happy about that. Their hardliners and alt-rightists are happy the U.S. pulled out of the deal, thinking they can start working towards nuclear weaponry again. MAGA



Can you actually be this ignorant???


Have you never heard of this policy, that of the civilized world for half a century?

1. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia



2. Are there any who believe that Obama didn't know the effects of a nuclear bomb?
Or the intentions of the 7th century barbarians who rule Iran????

If he didn't, why did he make these statements?


June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon






Yet, after uttering the words that would get him elected, he insisted that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism be given a green light to develop nuclear bombs.


What a back-stabbing snake.
All that cut n paste, completely off topic. Does it worry you, that you and your fellow nutjobs have the exact same stance on the Iran deal as Iran’s worst nutjobs? :itsok:



Either you are admitting that you cannot comprehend the pertinent information that I post....

...or you are a lying gutter-snipe.


Soooo....which is it?
 
Black flag-
Iran Nuclear Chief Says Uranium Stockpile Reaches 950 Tons
The chief of Iran's nuclear agency says the country's effort to acquire uranium has resulted in a stockpile of as much as 950 tons.

Ali Akbar Salehi, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, tells state TV on Wednesday that Iran has imported some 400 tons of the stuff since the 2015 landmark nuclear deal with Western powers, bringing its stockpile to between 900 and 950 tons — up from 500 tons.
Where is their enriched uranium? All gone. But might be coming back now if our former European allies fail to keep the deal in place.
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.
 
In so very many ways we see Trump as the antithesis of the mistake who occupied the Oval Office for neigh on a decade....

1. "World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA
IRAN’s President Hassan Rouhani has warned US President Donald Trump he risks “the mother of all wars” if he goes through with imposing economic sanctions against his country while encouraging dissent against his regime."
World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA




2. This is what Iran had earlier dealings with:
Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.

Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism
The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.





3. Can you imagine the 'O-faces' in Tehran when they saw this????

"To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE," Trump tweeted after returning to the White House from a weekend at his golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey. "WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!"
Trump tweets explosive threat to Iran President Rouhani - CNNPolitics




The President sure ain't Hussein Obama, or Jimmy Carter!!!
In so very many ways we see Trump as the antithesis of the mistake who occupied the Oval Office for neigh on a decade....

1. "World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA
IRAN’s President Hassan Rouhani has warned US President Donald Trump he risks “the mother of all wars” if he goes through with imposing economic sanctions against his country while encouraging dissent against his regime."
World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA




2. This is what Iran had earlier dealings with:
Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.

Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism
The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.





3. Can you imagine the 'O-faces' in Tehran when they saw this????

"To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE," Trump tweeted after returning to the White House from a weekend at his golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey. "WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!"
Trump tweets explosive threat to Iran President Rouhani - CNNPolitics




The President sure ain't Hussein Obama, or Jimmy Carter!!!
you keep on telling yourself this if it helps you cope with your undying adulation for a child raping sexual predator who is a barely functional retard that attacks war heroes and law enforcement, denigrates the military, disrespects the flag, and lies cheats and steals all the live long day. He appeals to the inner fucktard in all white trash


Everything you wrote is either false, or vulgar.

A Liberal, huh?
 
Still, had Kerry won America would have hit rock-bottom and be well on the way to full recovery just now. Of course there would be few Democrats still alive....though any downside to that is elusive.....



Harsh, Hank, ....harsh.


Keep on keepin' on.
 
Black flag-
Iran Nuclear Chief Says Uranium Stockpile Reaches 950 Tons
The chief of Iran's nuclear agency says the country's effort to acquire uranium has resulted in a stockpile of as much as 950 tons.

Ali Akbar Salehi, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, tells state TV on Wednesday that Iran has imported some 400 tons of the stuff since the 2015 landmark nuclear deal with Western powers, bringing its stockpile to between 900 and 950 tons — up from 500 tons.
Where is their enriched uranium? All gone. But might be coming back now if our former European allies fail to keep the deal in place.
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.



You need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser????

Sure thing....



"Iran and North Korea have engaged in nuclear-related trade or .... North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion.
The Iran-North Korea Strategic Relationship is an issue that has drawn minimum public attention in Washington since at least 2007 when I wrote extensively about it in a report I authored at the Congressional Research Service and updated for the next three years: North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy (section on Nuclear Collaboration with Iran and Syria). This, despite the extensive coverage of the major advances in the nuclear weapons and missile programs of North Korea and Iran since that time.

On nuclear collaboration, there has been a virtual blackout of public information.

The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads.

....North Korea earned about $1.5 billion annually from its missile collaboration with Iran alone. It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them."
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA18/20150728/103824/HHRG-114-FA18-Wstate-NikschL-20150728.pdf




The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads. This included mathematical formulas and codes for warhead designs “some of which appear to have originated in North Korea.” On missile collaboration one of several notable reports came from the New York Times on November 28, 2010. This report cited “secret American intelligence assessments” that North Korea had supplied Iran with 19 intermediate range missiles in 2006 with a range of up to 2,000 miles. This missile today is known as the Musudan, which North Korea has displayed on several occasions.
 
Where is their enriched uranium? All gone. But might be coming back now if our former European allies fail to keep the deal in place.
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.



You need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser????

Sure thing....



"Iran and North Korea have engaged in nuclear-related trade or .... North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion.
The Iran-North Korea Strategic Relationship is an issue that has drawn minimum public attention in Washington since at least 2007 when I wrote extensively about it in a report I authored at the Congressional Research Service and updated for the next three years: North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy (section on Nuclear Collaboration with Iran and Syria). This, despite the extensive coverage of the major advances in the nuclear weapons and missile programs of North Korea and Iran since that time.

On nuclear collaboration, there has been a virtual blackout of public information.

The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads.

....North Korea earned about $1.5 billion annually from its missile collaboration with Iran alone. It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them."
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA18/20150728/103824/HHRG-114-FA18-Wstate-NikschL-20150728.pdf




The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads. This included mathematical formulas and codes for warhead designs “some of which appear to have originated in North Korea.” On missile collaboration one of several notable reports came from the New York Times on November 28, 2010. This report cited “secret American intelligence assessments” that North Korea had supplied Iran with 19 intermediate range missiles in 2006 with a range of up to 2,000 miles. This missile today is known as the Musudan, which North Korea has displayed on several occasions.
Who! Who knew the Iran deal had been in place for over a decade! :cuckoo:
 
Black flag-
Iran Nuclear Chief Says Uranium Stockpile Reaches 950 Tons
The chief of Iran's nuclear agency says the country's effort to acquire uranium has resulted in a stockpile of as much as 950 tons.

Ali Akbar Salehi, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, tells state TV on Wednesday that Iran has imported some 400 tons of the stuff since the 2015 landmark nuclear deal with Western powers, bringing its stockpile to between 900 and 950 tons — up from 500 tons.
Where is their enriched uranium? All gone. But might be coming back now if our former European allies fail to keep the deal in place.
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.
So of course ballistic missle parts, information, blueprints, even full warheads are not detectable as nuclear.

You still have not floated any idea as to what they could be selling Iran.
Is it because you assume that Iran is so altruistic that they are just giving things to North Korea? Not even you can be that stupid.
 
In so very many ways we see Trump as the antithesis of the mistake who occupied the Oval Office for neigh on a decade....

1. "World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA
IRAN’s President Hassan Rouhani has warned US President Donald Trump he risks “the mother of all wars” if he goes through with imposing economic sanctions against his country while encouraging dissent against his regime."
World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA




2. This is what Iran had earlier dealings with:
Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.

Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism
The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.





3. Can you imagine the 'O-faces' in Tehran when they saw this????

"To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE," Trump tweeted after returning to the White House from a weekend at his golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey. "WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!"
Trump tweets explosive threat to Iran President Rouhani - CNNPolitics




The President sure ain't Hussein Obama, or Jimmy Carter!!!

Israel will pull a false flag or SA, along with the MEK, yes he was put in due to being a friend to Jews and well Adelson gave him 100 million and he wants to nuke Iran.

Trump is giving them a message perhaps. No he is not Obama , that is for sure, he is more of a wimp.
 
Where is their enriched uranium? All gone. But might be coming back now if our former European allies fail to keep the deal in place.
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.
So of course ballistic missle parts, information, blueprints, even full warheads are not detectable as nuclear.

You still have not floated any idea as to what they could be selling Iran.
Is it because you assume that Iran is so altruistic that they are just giving things to North Korea? Not even you can be that stupid.
Dude, just stop. You are not smarter than the countless people charged with certifying the deal.
 
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.



You need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser????

Sure thing....



"Iran and North Korea have engaged in nuclear-related trade or .... North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion.
The Iran-North Korea Strategic Relationship is an issue that has drawn minimum public attention in Washington since at least 2007 when I wrote extensively about it in a report I authored at the Congressional Research Service and updated for the next three years: North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy (section on Nuclear Collaboration with Iran and Syria). This, despite the extensive coverage of the major advances in the nuclear weapons and missile programs of North Korea and Iran since that time.

On nuclear collaboration, there has been a virtual blackout of public information.

The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads.

....North Korea earned about $1.5 billion annually from its missile collaboration with Iran alone. It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them."
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA18/20150728/103824/HHRG-114-FA18-Wstate-NikschL-20150728.pdf




The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads. This included mathematical formulas and codes for warhead designs “some of which appear to have originated in North Korea.” On missile collaboration one of several notable reports came from the New York Times on November 28, 2010. This report cited “secret American intelligence assessments” that North Korea had supplied Iran with 19 intermediate range missiles in 2006 with a range of up to 2,000 miles. This missile today is known as the Musudan, which North Korea has displayed on several occasions.
Who! Who knew the Iran deal had been in place for over a decade! :cuckoo:


As I blew your quote that there was no relationship between Iran and North Korea out of the water, you've now tried to tap-dance out of the claim.


Excellent.


Don't wipe the egg off your face....it's an improvement.
 
In so very many ways we see Trump as the antithesis of the mistake who occupied the Oval Office for neigh on a decade....

1. "World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA
IRAN’s President Hassan Rouhani has warned US President Donald Trump he risks “the mother of all wars” if he goes through with imposing economic sanctions against his country while encouraging dissent against his regime."
World War 3: Iran threatens the ‘mother of all wars’ against USA




2. This is what Iran had earlier dealings with:
Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.

Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism
The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.





3. Can you imagine the 'O-faces' in Tehran when they saw this????

"To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE," Trump tweeted after returning to the White House from a weekend at his golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey. "WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!"
Trump tweets explosive threat to Iran President Rouhani - CNNPolitics




The President sure ain't Hussein Obama, or Jimmy Carter!!!

Israel will pull a false flag or SA, along with the MEK, yes he was put in due to being a friend to Jews and well Adelson gave him 100 million and he wants to nuke Iran.

Trump is giving them a message perhaps. No he is not Obama , that is for sure, he is more of a wimp.



Is this your first anti-Semitic post of the day???


Have I missed any others????
 
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.



You need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser????

Sure thing....



"Iran and North Korea have engaged in nuclear-related trade or .... North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion.
The Iran-North Korea Strategic Relationship is an issue that has drawn minimum public attention in Washington since at least 2007 when I wrote extensively about it in a report I authored at the Congressional Research Service and updated for the next three years: North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy (section on Nuclear Collaboration with Iran and Syria). This, despite the extensive coverage of the major advances in the nuclear weapons and missile programs of North Korea and Iran since that time.

On nuclear collaboration, there has been a virtual blackout of public information.

The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads.

....North Korea earned about $1.5 billion annually from its missile collaboration with Iran alone. It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them."
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA18/20150728/103824/HHRG-114-FA18-Wstate-NikschL-20150728.pdf




The Washington Post reported on November 7, 2011, that “secret intelligence” provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran had received “crucial technology” from North Korea for the development of nuclear warheads. This included mathematical formulas and codes for warhead designs “some of which appear to have originated in North Korea.” On missile collaboration one of several notable reports came from the New York Times on November 28, 2010. This report cited “secret American intelligence assessments” that North Korea had supplied Iran with 19 intermediate range missiles in 2006 with a range of up to 2,000 miles. This missile today is known as the Musudan, which North Korea has displayed on several occasions.
Who! Who knew the Iran deal had been in place for over a decade! :cuckoo:


As I blew your quote that there was no relationship between Iran and North Korea out of the water, you've now tried to tap-dance out of the claim.


Excellent.


Don't wipe the egg off your face....it's an improvement.
You must not have read my quote :itsok:

You poor, sad thing
 
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.
So of course ballistic missle parts, information, blueprints, even full warheads are not detectable as nuclear.

You still have not floated any idea as to what they could be selling Iran.
Is it because you assume that Iran is so altruistic that they are just giving things to North Korea? Not even you can be that stupid.
Dude, just stop. You are not smarter than the countless people charged with certifying the deal.


There is no way to 'certify' the deal.....that's why it was written as it was.


"The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections




Contrary to the flaccid argument that Iran is in compliance with the agreement….and no matter who says it…..there is no way to know. The 7th century savages have a built-in dodge: Iran has 14 day to say whether to allow inspections asked for, and actually has the ability to delay any inspections up to 24 days.
There is no way of ascertaining whether or not Iran is adhering to the terms.




What sort of moron would on our side would sign that sort of deal???


Raise your paw.
 
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.
So of course ballistic missle parts, information, blueprints, even full warheads are not detectable as nuclear.

You still have not floated any idea as to what they could be selling Iran.
Is it because you assume that Iran is so altruistic that they are just giving things to North Korea? Not even you can be that stupid.
Dude, just stop. You are not smarter than the countless people charged with certifying the deal.


There is no way to 'certify' the deal.....that's why it was written as it was.


"The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections




Contrary to the flaccid argument that Iran is in compliance with the agreement….and no matter who says it…..there is no way to know. The 7th century savages have a built-in dodge: Iran has 14 day to say whether to allow inspections asked for, and actually has the ability to delay any inspections up to 24 days.
There is no way of ascertaining whether or not Iran is adhering to the terms.




What sort of moron would on our side would sign that sort of deal???


Raise your paw.
Changing the topic because you made a fool of yourself. The deal is dead now, little thing. Donnie owns whatever happens now. Iran’s already starting back up their centrifuge factories.
 
Dishonest Don ran the most racist campaign in the history of America; he worked the Weak Whyte Supremacist crowd with his snake oil and the help of Poppa Putin. So sad.
 
Want to see all the secret exemptions that were made just because they didn’t come into compliance?
http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/JCPOA_Exemptions_Revealed_1Sept2016_Final1.pdf
The only reason the EU still want the crazy Iran deal is the oil.

It is known that North Korea has been trading with Iran. What do you think that they might be trading? Their excess food? Their excess world war 2 military equipment?
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.
So of course ballistic missle parts, information, blueprints, even full warheads are not detectable as nuclear.

You still have not floated any idea as to what they could be selling Iran.
Is it because you assume that Iran is so altruistic that they are just giving things to North Korea? Not even you can be that stupid.
Dude, just stop. You are not smarter than the countless people charged with certifying the deal.
 
Russia will supply them from that uranium Hillary sold them!


One MORE fucking time for the truly ignorant Trump ass kissers


Most of the $145 million in Clinton Foundation donations came from one person, a major Uranium One investor named Frank Giustra. Mr. Giustra has said that he sold all his shares in Uranium One about 1-1/2 years before Mrs. Clinton became secretary of State – and three years before Rosatom and its Russian cash came calling.

There is no direct evidence of a quid pro quo between Clinton and Uranium One backers. As one of nine members of a US committee weighing the deal, it was not within Clinton’s power to approve the deal on her own. There is no evidence Clinton was even informed of the prospective deal while she was secretary of State. While cabinet heads make up the committee, that is a nominal position. As often the case in government, subordinates go to the meetings and do the work.

What's the real story behind Hillary Clinton, Russia, and uranium ...

https://www.csmonitor.com/.../What-s-the-real-story-behind-Hillary-Clinton-Russia-..
 
Last edited:
Want to see all the secret exemptions that were made just because they didn’t come into compliance?
http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/JCPOA_Exemptions_Revealed_1Sept2016_Final1.pdf
Nothing nuclear. But then again, you think our intelligence agencies are all traitors.
Nothing nuclear? What else do they have to barter with? Do you think they have billions of party favors sitting around that Iran is willing to give up oil and food for? That has to be completely crazy.

I do not think that our intelligence agencies are traitors, you are just crazy enough to think that. Do I think that certain people are corrupt? Yes absolutely. Do I think that the intelligence community can be wrong? Absolutely. 9/11 no actionable intelligence. Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Pearl Harbor. The Tet Offensive. Just to name a few.
Our intelligence agencies detected nothing nuclear between NK and Iran under the deal and Iran was certified in compliance and stillnis.
So of course ballistic missle parts, information, blueprints, even full warheads are not detectable as nuclear.

You still have not floated any idea as to what they could be selling Iran.
Is it because you assume that Iran is so altruistic that they are just giving things to North Korea? Not even you can be that stupid.
Dude, just stop. You are not smarter than the countless people charged with certifying the deal.
Changing the topic again. *sigh*

Your few exemptions are insignificant in comparison to what Iran surrendered under the terms of the deal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top