Balancer
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #81
Much more modest in scale events in the Donbass. For the US, probably there is no fundamental difference between Syria and the Donbas, both are equally far away, but for Russia the Donbass is at the border. It's nearby. And these are Russian people.
Last night, the Ukrainian army arranged a very large artillery shelling at once many civilian settlements in the Donbass. It was destroyed about ten home, many heavily wounded, including children. One child died - the shell exploded right in the schoolyard.
In Russia, many are puzzled why Russia does not interfere in what is happening in the Donbas. Like, all the same, the relationship is spoiled with the whole world, sanctions and all that. And if Russia provides direct military assistance to the Donbas, it will not get any worse, but at least these people will be saved. One hell, the whole world thinks so, that Russian troops are in the Donbass. So why not introduce them there in fact?
I have no answer to this question. As there is no unequivocal opinion as to which decision is right.
Last night, the Ukrainian army arranged a very large artillery shelling at once many civilian settlements in the Donbass. It was destroyed about ten home, many heavily wounded, including children. One child died - the shell exploded right in the schoolyard.
In Russia, many are puzzled why Russia does not interfere in what is happening in the Donbas. Like, all the same, the relationship is spoiled with the whole world, sanctions and all that. And if Russia provides direct military assistance to the Donbas, it will not get any worse, but at least these people will be saved. One hell, the whole world thinks so, that Russian troops are in the Donbass. So why not introduce them there in fact?
I have no answer to this question. As there is no unequivocal opinion as to which decision is right.