Violence of September the 6th!

[PoliticalChic]

And, some more Leftists wedded to violence......


5. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust."
Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson, Historian, CambridgeUniversity






To review.....the French Revolution saw violence as an acceptable method of 'teaching' the masses.
And every political iteration that stemmed from same believes the same.
Socialism, anarchism, communism, Liberalism, Progressivism.

Genocide is simply 'breaking some eggs to make an omelette.'

 

[NYcarbineer]

Today is September the 6th.


1. On this date, in 1901, a terrorist shot President William McKinley as he prepared to give a speech in Buffalo during the Pan-American Exposition; he died a few days later.
Leon Czolgosz, an itinerant laborer, confessed that he believed that it was “his duty” as an irregular member of an international network of anarchists, devoted to the destruction of the emerging global industrial order.





What better time to remind all that at the center of every iteration of Liberalism, we find violence.
For the Leftist, when lies fail to gain his objectives, he is perfectly content to resort to violence.


After all....socialism, Marxism, modern Liberalism....all are birthed in violence, steeped in violence, and not merely the head-breaking variety of unionism....but the sort that doesn't hesitate to kill.
Millions.




2. The French Revolution, progenitor of Liberalism, under Robespierre interpreted violence as the ‘language’ that explained to the masses the ideals of the revolution. “If the spring of popular government in times of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror….Terror is nothing other than justice.”
Robespierre speech, February 5, 1794.

a. “For the first time in history terror became an official government policy, with the stated aim to use violence in order to achieve a higher political goal. Unlike the later meaning of 'terrorists' as people who use violence against a government, the terrorists of the French Revolution were the government. The Terror was legal, having been voted for by the Convention.”
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5829848/Robespierre-and-the-terror-Marisa.html

b. Georges Sorel and every other advocate of the left, learned and understood this message.

c. Bolsheviks claimed descent: “Historians of the French Revolution, which the Russians saw as a model for their own…”
Bolshevik Festivals 1917 1920






3.' Although attributed to Rousseau, it was Diderot who gave the model for totalitarianism of reason:
“We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will.'
Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

And to, for the modern Liberal, Republicans are not merely wrong...they are evil: they hate minorities, gays, children, etc., etc.



a. Robespierre used Rousseau’s call for a “reign of virtue,’ proclaiming the Republic of Virtue, his euphemism for The Terror. In ‘The Social Contract’ Rousseau advocated death for anyone who did not uphold the common values of the community: the totalitarian view of reshaping of humanity, echoed in communism, Nazism, progressivism. Robespierre: “the necessity of bringing about a complete regeneration and, if I may express myself so, of creating a new people.”
Ibid.


Anyone need me to provide a quote from Hillary Clinton proclaiming the same view?

So Liberalism believes not in big government, but in no government?

The American Revolution was an armed rebellion, in case you missed that detail.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Anyone need me to provide a quote from Hillary Clinton proclaiming the same view?

You mean this one?

Link and context missing. Oh, what a surprise!

Why are you so lazy?

How about you provide a defense for your heroine, and supply said context.

My "heroine"? Sorry, I don't use drugs, though I suspect you do. If you don't, maybe you should.

So.....we agree that, in addition to your other inadequacies, you are also lazy?

We agree on very little. That little box which limits your thinking is locked, new ideas and pragmatic solutions are not able to get in, for you lack the key to open your mind - that key is imagination.

If that were true.....you'd have very little difficulty in rebutting the OP....

But, you haven't been able to do so.

BTW....the OP is not about 'solutions,' but simply revealing the truth about Leftists, Liberals, socialists, communists, Nazis,......etc.

"The Truth"?

The truth gnaws away at the indoctrinated, i.e., you.....
...but you aren't educated enough to mount an attack.





And......






You know how thorough I am.

Let me warn you in advance: Keep your hands inside the ride at all times.

I actually have a life, lazy I'm not. To argue with a narcissist isn't sane (review the conclusion of doing the same thing over and over again).

So....tell me again: who put the gun to your head and forced you to subscribe to the thread?

Right.....and now you wave a white flag.


Great!

Gee, I would have thought you would have accused me of waving a red flag; but, I digress. The point being, arguing with a narcissist is insane, and I'm sane.

If you're and example of sane, I'll stick with what I have.


Since you have yet to reply to anything in the OP, you must post as Obama did...."present."

I'd put my MMPI against your's anytime.

The OP is the same in all of your threads. In summary, "Ain't (fill in the blank***) Awful"

*** Examples:
Presidents:
Wilson;
FDR;
Carter;
Clinton;
Obama;
And, all:
Democrats;
liberals;
progressives.

Of course anyone who chooses to disagree with you, or question your opinion, is met with the following:

"You're:
Stupid;
ignorant;
insane;
a commie;
Marxist;
Socialist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Today is September the 6th.


1. On this date, in 1901, a terrorist shot President William McKinley as he prepared to give a speech in Buffalo during the Pan-American Exposition; he died a few days later.
Leon Czolgosz, an itinerant laborer, confessed that he believed that it was “his duty” as an irregular member of an international network of anarchists, devoted to the destruction of the emerging global industrial order.





What better time to remind all that at the center of every iteration of Liberalism, we find violence.
For the Leftist, when lies fail to gain his objectives, he is perfectly content to resort to violence.


After all....socialism, Marxism, modern Liberalism....all are birthed in violence, steeped in violence, and not merely the head-breaking variety of unionism....but the sort that doesn't hesitate to kill.
Millions.




2. The French Revolution, progenitor of Liberalism, under Robespierre interpreted violence as the ‘language’ that explained to the masses the ideals of the revolution. “If the spring of popular government in times of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror….Terror is nothing other than justice.”
Robespierre speech, February 5, 1794.

a. “For the first time in history terror became an official government policy, with the stated aim to use violence in order to achieve a higher political goal. Unlike the later meaning of 'terrorists' as people who use violence against a government, the terrorists of the French Revolution were the government. The Terror was legal, having been voted for by the Convention.”
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5829848/Robespierre-and-the-terror-Marisa.html

b. Georges Sorel and every other advocate of the left, learned and understood this message.

c. Bolsheviks claimed descent: “Historians of the French Revolution, which the Russians saw as a model for their own…”
Bolshevik Festivals 1917 1920






3.' Although attributed to Rousseau, it was Diderot who gave the model for totalitarianism of reason:
“We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will.'
Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

And to, for the modern Liberal, Republicans are not merely wrong...they are evil: they hate minorities, gays, children, etc., etc.



a. Robespierre used Rousseau’s call for a “reign of virtue,’ proclaiming the Republic of Virtue, his euphemism for The Terror. In ‘The Social Contract’ Rousseau advocated death for anyone who did not uphold the common values of the community: the totalitarian view of reshaping of humanity, echoed in communism, Nazism, progressivism. Robespierre: “the necessity of bringing about a complete regeneration and, if I may express myself so, of creating a new people.”
Ibid.


Anyone need me to provide a quote from Hillary Clinton proclaiming the same view?

So Liberalism believes not in big government, but in no government?

The American Revolution was an armed rebellion, in case you missed that detail.

How many times will you resort to either lying or obfuscation.

The latter mode duly noted in your post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Since WWII, the less educated have been indoctrinated to believe that, while communism might be leftwing, Nazism was rightwing.


This is a perfect time to rectify the myth that Nazism was any different from Marxism....



6. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film at - The Soviet Story Docu - Full Movie English - LivingScoop




7. Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. ( film at 18:30)


a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.


b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The premise of this thread is that the disreputability of Leftists extends to a pattern of murder and related atrocities.


8. Now...to end this exposition, and to bring it home.....back to the assassination of United States President William McKinley, today, September 6, of 1901
Killed by a Leftist.

Nor is this unusual.......


Every presidential assassin in the history of this nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- ....

....none were right-wingers. None.



1. Let's begin with John Wilkes Booth: he was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South! THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN. - Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker. - NYTimes.com

Lincoln was assassinated byJohn Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.)
John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia
John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia


2. Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James Garfield, was part of a utopian commune, the Oneida Community, where free love was practiced.
Ackerman, “Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield,” p.135


3. Leon Czolgosz, who killed President McKinley, was a socialist and anarchist, whose act was instigated by a speech he heard by socialist Emma Goldman. American Experience Emma Goldman Transcript PBS


4. John Schrank, who shot and wounded Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, seemed to have no affiliation other than opposition to a third term.
Theodore Roosevelt shot in Milwaukee mdash History.com This Day in History mdash 10 14 1912


5. Giuseppe Zangara, who came close to killing President Roosevelt in 1933, (he killed Mayor Cermak) hated the rich and sought to “make even with the capitalists.” Outside of shooting elected officials, he would have made an ideal pick for Obama’s cabinet.
http://digital.library.miami.edu/gov/FDRAssn.html


6.Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot JFK, had been a communist ever since he read a communist pamphlet about the Rosenbergs. As soon as he was arrested, he called John Abt, lawyer for the American Communist Party.


7. Sirhan Sirhan, who killed Robert Kennedy, was a Palestinian who hated Kennedy’s support of Israel, typical of Liberal activists, and the NYTimes.


8. Arthur Bremer shot George Wallace in 1972, due to Wallace’s support for segregation.
http://basicfamouspeople.com//index.php?aid=7134
"Bremer wanted all property divided equally,..."
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weis...lace Assassination Attempt Part 1/Item 05.pdf
Upon his release, Bremer showed no remorse: “ ‘shooting segregationist dinosaurs’ is not like shooting people because ‘they are extinct by act of God.’ This mention of God was the only blemish on Bremer’s otherwise impeccable liberal credentials.” Coulter, “Guilty,” p. 260.


8. Lynette ‘Squeaky’ Fromme, tried to shoot President Ford because she was incensed about the plight of the California redwoods.
http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=209933


10. Sara Jane Moore also tried to kill President Ford because “the government had declared war on the left.”
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=4900159


11. John Hinckley shot President Reagan to impress a girl. The jury found him “not guilty by reason of insanity.”
“…which is as good a definition of liberalism as I’ve heard.”
Coulter, “Guilty.” P. 260.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Anyone need me to provide a quote from Hillary Clinton proclaiming the same view?

You mean this one?

Link and context missing. Oh, what a surprise!

Why are you so lazy?

How about you provide a defense for your heroine, and supply said context.

My "heroine"? Sorry, I don't use drugs, though I suspect you do. If you don't, maybe you should.

So.....we agree that, in addition to your other inadequacies, you are also lazy?

We agree on very little. That little box which limits your thinking is locked, new ideas and pragmatic solutions are not able to get in, for you lack the key to open your mind - that key is imagination.

If that were true.....you'd have very little difficulty in rebutting the OP....

But, you haven't been able to do so.

BTW....the OP is not about 'solutions,' but simply revealing the truth about Leftists, Liberals, socialists, communists, Nazis,......etc.

"The Truth"?

The truth gnaws away at the indoctrinated, i.e., you.....
...but you aren't educated enough to mount an attack.





And......






You know how thorough I am.

Let me warn you in advance: Keep your hands inside the ride at all times.

I actually have a life, lazy I'm not. To argue with a narcissist isn't sane (review the conclusion of doing the same thing over and over again).

So....tell me again: who put the gun to your head and forced you to subscribe to the thread?

Right.....and now you wave a white flag.


Great!

Gee, I would have thought you would have accused me of waving a red flag; but, I digress. The point being, arguing with a narcissist is insane, and I'm sane.

If you're and example of sane, I'll stick with what I have.


Since you have yet to reply to anything in the OP, you must post as Obama did...."present."

I'd put my MMPI against your's anytime.

The OP is the same in all of your threads. In summary, "Ain't (fill in the blank***) Awful"

*** Examples:
Presidents:
Wilson;
FDR;
Carter;
Clinton;
Obama;
And, all:
Democrats;
liberals;
progressives.

Of course anyone who chooses to disagree with you, or question your opinion, is met with the following:

"You're:
Stupid;
ignorant;
insane;
a commie;
Marxist;
Socialist.

You left off 'moron'.....


...you moron.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Anyone need me to provide a quote from Hillary Clinton proclaiming the same view?

You mean this one?

Link and context missing. Oh, what a surprise!

Why are you so lazy?

How about you provide a defense for your heroine, and supply said context.

She was referring to ending the Bush tax cuts. Those were the 'things' that were going to be taken away.

 

[Toronado3800]

Since WWII, the less educated have been indoctrinated to believe that, while communism might be leftwing, Nazism was rightwing.


This is a perfect time to rectify the myth that Nazism was any different from Marxism....



6. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film at - The Soviet Story Docu - Full Movie English - LivingScoop

7. Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. ( film at 18:30)


a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.


b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.

What side did the 1937 NAZI's pick in the Slanish Civil War?

I honestly think this evil and good horse shoe arguement is too simplistic. Now we all have our reasons. And I may conservatively believe the government has no right telling me about abortions and liberally think the NSA can listen to everyone's phone calls so its difficult to rank where people belong on the shoe. Who said the ends of the shoe are easier to jump between than the middle?

Political Compass - Analysis

Has some interesting rankings on a more complicated x / y axis.

 

[Toronado3800]

Slanish. My god. Even a new bigger keyboard and I cant type.

 

[Care4all]

McKinley was a pawn, paid for by Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Morgan....

I DO NOT AGREE with his assassination.

you lost me on this comment:

For the Leftist, when lies fail to gain his objectives, he is perfectly content to resort to violence.

THAT, shows your purposely miniscule mind and intent, right on your coat sleeve! Same ole same ole PC....

You start a thread on 'this day in History', and McKinley... then contort and twist in to this lengthy mambo jambo that has nothing to do with "this day in History"...?

Why not give remembrance of McKinley, who was shot, this day in history?

 

[PoliticalChic]

McKinley was a pawn, paid for by Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Morgan....

I DO NOT AGREE with his assassination.

you lost me on this comment:

For the Leftist, when lies fail to gain his objectives, he is perfectly content to resort to violence.

THAT, shows your purposely miniscule mind and intent, right on your coat sleeve! Same ole same ole PC....

You start a thread on 'this day in History', and McKinley... then contort and twist in to this lengthy mambo jambo that has nothing to do with "this day in History"...?

Why not give remembrance of McKinley, who was shot, this day in history?

Seems many things 'lose you.'

Lots of stuff that reveal the dark, slimy side of Liberalism.

I notice that you were unable to find anything untrue.

 

[NYcarbineer]

McKinley was a pawn, paid for by Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Morgan....

I DO NOT AGREE with his assassination.

you lost me on this comment:

For the Leftist, when lies fail to gain his objectives, he is perfectly content to resort to violence.

THAT, shows your purposely miniscule mind and intent, right on your coat sleeve! Same ole same ole PC....

You start a thread on 'this day in History', and McKinley... then contort and twist in to this lengthy mambo jambo that has nothing to do with "this day in History"...?

Why not give remembrance of McKinley, who was shot, this day in history?

Seems many things 'lose you.'

Lots of stuff that reveal the dark, slimy side of Liberalism.

I notice that you were unable to find anything untrue.

The Nazis are an example of the 'dark side' of conservatism.
There, even steven.