Very Disappointed

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by RetiredGySgt, Apr 30, 2008.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,565
    Thanks Received:
    5,901
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,979
    I have been cut of from the internet since the other day because of piss poor service by my provider. But that is not what this is about.

    The majority of the posters on this board seem to think that when they do not like something it is fine to use the " ends justify the means" , I have little reason to discuss much with people that have no basic understanding of our legal system ( you remember, innocent till proven guilty?) Or our Constitution.

    I will be reconsidering my participation on a board where the mob rules.

    All I can say is you deserve the place that " the ends justify the means" leads to. No one has any rights if every one does not have them. The worst of the worst MUST have the EXACT same rights as EVERYONE.

    We have Lawyers on this board that have no problem what so ever that the rights protected by our Constitution are violated, just as long as it is some group they happen to dislike. Left and right alike have expressed the opinion that "hey they do not deserve protection".

    The end is closer than I thought. Enjoy your "rights" they are going to be gone soon enough when the people all think it is fine to take them away from "that guy".
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. ReillyT
    Offline

    ReillyT Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,631
    Thanks Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    London, UK
    Ratings:
    +164
    If you want to argue about a particular issue, then that is great, but don't whine when people don't agree with you.
     
  3. dread
    Offline

    dread Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    603
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +43

    Kind of hard for the FLDS people to claim rights when they wont even claim their own children.


    Those people have rights they just aren't exercising them.
     
  4. Anguille
    Offline

    Anguille Bane of the Urbane

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    17,910
    Thanks Received:
    2,122
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,137
    I suppose this is about reactions to what is happening with the FLDS.
    Maybe you are threatening to leave because you can't admit that it's looking more and more like the government has done the right thing to remove the children?
     
  5. dread
    Offline

    dread Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    603
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +43
    RGS,


    You never answered my question here:


    http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=53787&page=9


    Would YOU let your daughter become brainwashed/indocternated? And if so would YOU just stand idly by and watch your grandchild get raped?
     
  6. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    48,712
    Thanks Received:
    7,230
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +20,768
    waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh!

    I'm taking my ball and going home! :( :( :(
     
  7. Dogger
    Offline

    Dogger Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Dixie
    Ratings:
    +58
    Since we don't have "The Whine Zone", perhaps gunny should move this into "The Flame Zone", because that's the type of response you've invited.

    I have differed from you on which means are permissible, but acknowledging that some situations make perfect procedural fairness impossible does not equate to "ends justify the means". State officials have to act when they receive information of abuse, and there is no doubt abuse was happening there.

    I am troubled by everything that is happening to the individual members of the polygamous cult, but there is no clean way to surgically remove only certain children without the risk of another Waco. And the large number of people and interweaving relationships makes speedy resolution impossible as well.

    We don't have the best information available, so I would rather err on the side of protecting the child victims than killing them. Justice will come in time.
     
  8. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    You really have no argument. One, your claim that the state served a warrant KNOWING it was based on a hoax call is unsubstantiated. A vell phone number shows up on caller ID as the number it is given when registered, regardless where that person is. The fact that caller ID showed a Colorado area code means nothing.

    If it turns out the call was in fact a hoax, then that person should be punished by law for placing the call.

    That does not in any way undo what the police have found by responding to that call. Basically, they have found that the allegations are true. You can't deny 31 children ages 14-17 either pregnant or already having children.

    By your reasoning, you think these people have the right to abuse their children and the state has no right to interfere.

    If you choose to leave because no one agrees with THAT, that is your choice. I don't know what to tell you. Until you can prove the stated acted with the knowledge they were acting on false information, you have no argument in that regard. In fact, I already posted a timeline in one of these thread that pretty-much shows they did not.

    It's like you're stuck on the rights of the parents and get past that to look at any other evidence that pretty much shoots down every claim you have made.
     
  9. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    He's talking about the fact that people decide, based on word of mouth, whether or not people are guilty, and based on that bias, believe that it's okay, before any evidence has been presented, to dismantle families and terrorize children.

    Everybody who screams for a hanging does so on the allegations that one guy, who is NOW IN PRISON, committed child abuse. Even though the children weren't removed when that guy was being tried, they think it's honky-dorie that the kids be removed now on suspicion that there might be hanky-panky going on..and they continue to use that case as the "reason".

    The truth is, there is no reason for the shrieking mania we're hearing on this site from people who wish the worst of things on people who haven't even been charge of a crime. There's no reason for their steadfast committment to dismantling these families, when they're willing to overlook the fact that we give welfare checks to underaged mothers living with their boyfriends EVERY DAY. The people giving the welfare checks are the SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE TERRORIZING these women based on nothing except the "suspicion" that they're having babies with older men.

    I'm not disappointed, because I know how lacking in any moral compass people who will condone the behavior of one group, and harass another are. I know what the issue is here, and it's not child abuse.
     
  10. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,565
    Thanks Received:
    5,901
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,979
    GunnyL has no case, he stated unreservedly in another thread that in the case of this group " the ends Justify the Means" no caveat , no hesitation and no evidence.

    Jillian has no problem with Family Courts that are Unconstitutional and Illegal.

    The Constitution is clear. Innocent TILL PROVEN Guilty, The State does not get to create an entire court system then claim it is not a court system because they say so. Family courts you are guilty unless YOU prove otherwise.

    But do keep up the pretense. The chickens ARE coming home to roost. And when they do do not BOTHER whining about it cause you all thought it was fine with some other group. You have sold out your own rights and deserve the results to follow.
     

Share This Page