JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,753
- 2,220
The proof is in observing who benifits from all this crap, jack-ass.
That's not "proof." That's "conjecture."
No, it is proof. Proof does not have to be mathematically air-tight to be proof. It can be circumstantial and/or relay on obvious observations such as 'he who profits did it.'
Proof | Define Proof at Dictionary.com
1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.
2. anything serving as such evidence: What proof do you have?
3. the act of testing or making trial of anything; test; trial: to put a thing to the proof.
4. the establishment of the truth of anything; demonstration.
5. Law . (in judicial proceedings) evidence having probative weight.
And it's the main argument of the twoofers on why Bush and the oil companies were behind 9/11.
Bullshit. The terrorists were behind 9/11 and what the twofers provide is not what they think it is, as the biggest benificiary was not Bush and the Oil companies, but the Islamacist terroists.