Newt sumbitted 12-14K signatures.
No, he didn't.
Yes, he did. The RPV invalidated them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Newt sumbitted 12-14K signatures.
No, he didn't.
Another dumbfuck who can't read.Newt sumbitted 12-14K signatures.
No, he didn't.
Yes, he did. The RPV invalidated them.
Takes it to court??10,000 signatures out of a state which cast 3.7 million votes in the last presidential election- and he had MONTHS -- MONTHS to do it...
and still the Fig Newton lickers think it was somebody else's fault.
Newt sumbitted 12-14K signatures. This was a fix, not a fair process..
And if Newt takes this to court, he will probably prevail. The problem here is that you have a GOP that is pretty much determined it's going to cheat to get it's weird Mormon Robot nominated, rather than consider why voters aren't going for it.
No, it means he's a fucking asshole whom nobody likes.Gingrich has ... even fewer complimentary things said about him by people who worked with him in the 1990s.
Which only means that Gingrich managed to get things done in DC but ruffled some feathers doing it.
You're a fucking idiot. Bachman, Huntsman and Santorum didn't get enough signatures. Newt paid $1.50 per signature, got over 11,000, but many were not legitimate. That's why you have to get about twice as many signatures as needed in order to make sure you have enough legitimate ones. Which Mittens and Paul did.
You would think, as 'smart' as Newt claims to be, he would take the needed steps to get on the ballot in his own adopted state!
How in the hell did Gingrich allow this to happen? I highly doubt he couldn't find 10K signatures in the state of VA.
What a blunder.
Perry on the other hand, probably couldn't find 10K signatures in VA.
The simple fact is that to run for President you need to lay the groundwork in advance, build a network of individuals to go out and get signatures in each state where it is necessary. Everybody but Paul and Romney blew it in Virginia and this has to be a warning shot for all the others that they had best make sure they get on the states ballots that are left. Everybody knew the rules so there is no excuse. I take that back, it appears that some do not know the rules.
Gingrich, Perry Fail to Make Virginia Primary - BloombergVoters deserve the right to vote for any top contender, especially leading candidates, Michael Krull, Gingrichs campaign director, said in a statement. We will work with the Republican Party of Virginia to pursue an aggressive write-in campaign to make sure that all the voters of Virginia are able to vote for the candidate of their choice.
Virginia law, however, says that no write-in shall be permitted on ballots in primary elections. The state partys decision is a setback for Gingrich and may benefit Romney as it underscores the campaign organization needed for a run for the White House.
You're a fucking idiot. Bachman, Huntsman and Santorum didn't get enough signatures. Newt paid $1.50 per signature, got over 11,000, but many were not legitimate. That's why you have to get about twice as many signatures as needed in order to make sure you have enough legitimate ones. Which Mittens and Paul did.
You would think, as 'smart' as Newt claims to be, he would take the needed steps to get on the ballot in his own adopted state!
So they only people the REPUBLICAN Party lets on the ballot are Mitt and the Crazy Guy, and you don't smell a fix? Really?
I hear Mitt Romney is going to hire Tonya Harding as his campaign director. Expect a lot of broken kneecaps in the next few weeks.
No. Virginia has the strictest ballot access requirements in the nation. Every candidate is aware of this, or should be.
you understand what Hesitant means? It means that wont rule it out. nice spinRomney's religion is his worst enemy. Mormons aren't Christians according to the religious right. Of course, he's the only candidate that has any chance.
Well, a couple things on that. First, you are assuming that hostility towards Mormonism is the exclusive domain of the "Religious Right". It isn't. Gallup took a poll that says that 22% of the population won't vote for a Mormon. Which, by the way, should be a good enough reason for EVERY Republican to do a double take about this guy.
In U.S., 22% Are Hesitant to Support a Mormon in 2012
BUt if you go into the numbers, 18% of Republicans won't support a Mormon, but a whopping 27% of Democrats won't, either. The number for indepedents is 19%.
Religiously, 23% of protestants wont, with 16% of Catholics and 22% of "non-Christians".
And here's the thing. It really is a liability. Mormons believe in some truly weird stuff, and they have a really bizarre history. Things the MSM will be happy to inform us of- AFTER Romney secures the nomination.
Secondly, beyond his religion, Romney has a lot of other problems. He made his money screwing working folks, a fact Obama will not neglect to remind people of. He's stiff and robotic and generally not likable. He occassionally says insentive things like "Corporations are people, too" and "I'll bet you $10,000." and my personal favorite, 'My sons working on my campaign is serving their country".
Now if you want to argue that he's stronger than the other six dwarves, you can argue that. I think Perry would be a stronger candidate if he can rise above the media character assassination of him. I think Gingrich would be a stronger candidate because he's smart and articulate. I think both men have been sandbagged by a GOP establishment that drank the koolaid on Romney.
on top of that, this is a fairly old poll and people change their minds when its the lesser of two evils.
you understand what hesitant means? It means that wont rule it out. Nice spinwell, a couple things on that. First, you are assuming that hostility towards mormonism is the exclusive domain of the "religious right". It isn't. Gallup took a poll that says that 22% of the population won't vote for a mormon. Which, by the way, should be a good enough reason for every republican to do a double take about this guy.
in u.s., 22% are hesitant to support a mormon in 2012
but if you go into the numbers, 18% of republicans won't support a mormon, but a whopping 27% of democrats won't, either. The number for indepedents is 19%.
Religiously, 23% of protestants wont, with 16% of catholics and 22% of "non-christians".
And here's the thing. It really is a liability. Mormons believe in some truly weird stuff, and they have a really bizarre history. Things the msm will be happy to inform us of- after romney secures the nomination.
Secondly, beyond his religion, romney has a lot of other problems. He made his money screwing working folks, a fact obama will not neglect to remind people of. He's stiff and robotic and generally not likable. He occassionally says insentive things like "corporations are people, too" and "i'll bet you $10,000." and my personal favorite, 'my sons working on my campaign is serving their country".
Now if you want to argue that he's stronger than the other six dwarves, you can argue that. I think perry would be a stronger candidate if he can rise above the media character assassination of him. I think gingrich would be a stronger candidate because he's smart and articulate. I think both men have been sandbagged by a gop establishment that drank the koolaid on romney.
on top of that, this is a fairly old poll and people change their minds when its the lesser of two evils.
it doesnt matter as romney will not win the general election, not so much because of who he is, mormon or whatever, but because too many people are getting sick to death of gop establsihment bullshit like this.
Right now i will vote for anyone, obama, paul, trump, rosie o'donnel, but i will not vote for anyone that the gop establishment is behind.
They can esad.
And for the posters who like reading actual journalistic sources:
"Perrys campaign told state election officials it had submitted 11,911 signatures, and Gingrichs campaign said it submitted 11,050 signatures. State party officials spent Friday night validating the signatures."
Gingrich, Perry disqualified from Va. primary ballot - Virginia Politics - The Washington Post
10,000 signatures out of a state which cast 3.7 million votes in the last presidential election- and he had MONTHS -- MONTHS to do it...
and still the Fig Newton lickers think it was somebody else's fault.
Newt sumbitted 12-14K signatures. This was a fix, not a fair process..
And if Newt takes this to court, he will probably prevail. The problem here is that you have a GOP that is pretty much determined it's going to cheat to get it's weird Mormon Robot nominated, rather than consider why voters aren't going for it.
you understand what hesitant means? It means that wont rule it out. Nice spin
on top of that, this is a fairly old poll and people change their minds when its the lesser of two evils.
it doesnt matter as romney will not win the general election, not so much because of who he is, mormon or whatever, but because too many people are getting sick to death of gop establsihment bullshit like this.
Right now i will vote for anyone, obama, paul, trump, rosie o'donnel, but i will not vote for anyone that the gop establishment is behind.
They can esad.
your support for continued corruption is noted.
it doesnt matter as romney will not win the general election, not so much because of who he is, mormon or whatever, but because too many people are getting sick to death of gop establsihment bullshit like this.
Right now i will vote for anyone, obama, paul, trump, rosie o'donnel, but i will not vote for anyone that the gop establishment is behind.
They can esad.
your support for continued corruption is noted.
Dude, supporting the GOP as it bends and breaks anyrules and laws it wants to to get their annointed one on the ballot and keep all but one rival off, that is not corruption?
Yes, the whole process runs on corruption in one form or another, and most of it is far more subtle.
All you can really do these days is draw the line at how blatant the corruption can be that you are willing to ignore.
This VA ballot crosses the line as it isnt just corrupt but takes valid choices from the GOP voters and is blatantly anti-democratic.
For Christ's sake why not just have these assholes just annoint their pick 12 months before the general election and let everyone stuff it if they dont like it? Oh, because then they would have no chance inthe general election as real Americans prefer a democratic process, not this corrupt bullshit the GOP is pushing on everyone now.
CNN was saying what Gingrich said:And for the posters who like reading actual journalistic sources:
"Perrys campaign told state election officials it had submitted 11,911 signatures, and Gingrichs campaign said it submitted 11,050 signatures. State party officials spent Friday night validating the signatures."
Gingrich, Perry disqualified from Va. primary ballot - Virginia Politics - The Washington Post
lol, CNN isnt a news source when it contradicts you?
lololol
You are some kind of special stupid, aren't you?That's a pile of shit.
Gingrichs' camp only served up 11,050 signatures - ACCORDING TO THE GINGRICH CAMP.
Not enough. He fucked up. Big time.
The dude is so inept he didn't even know HIS OWN STATE of residency doesn't allow primary write-in signatures.
Stop pulling numbers out of your ass and stop blaming others for Fig Newton's failures.
You are a frigging retard.
Here is what Gingrich said:
Gingrich, Perry fail to qualify for GOP primary ballot in Virginia - CNN.com
Hell, even Keyes got on the ballot back in 2008.
The difference is that the Virginia GOP changed the proscess this year:
Virginia’s GOP Primary Ballot: Romney, Paul… And That’s It. - By Jim Geraghty - The Campaign Spot - National Review Online
...
At some point in your short & putrid life here, you'll come to know when I post something, I am always ready to back it up. Never doubt me.
You will lose every time.
Meanwhile, you will continue to be a blithering blame machine of spectacular proportions.
Listen up Douche: Fig Newton handed in 11,050 Ballots.
NOT 12,000 to 14,000. Your problem is: You listen to Newt.
That's the first indication to readers of your shit how deluded you are.
Now, I'll put it in Whack-job right wing Newsmax media presentation terms, so you can grasp the nuances of words that escape you - like OOOOOPPPPS!
Gingrich Makes Virginia Ballot; Others Miss OutAccording to the Virginia state board of elections, Gingrich made the ballot with 11,050 signatures, which is short of the 12,000 to 13,000 he said he had at an event in Arlington, Va. on Wednesday night.
CNN was saying what Gingrich said:And for the posters who like reading actual journalistic sources:
"Perrys campaign told state election officials it had submitted 11,911 signatures, and Gingrichs campaign said it submitted 11,050 signatures. State party officials spent Friday night validating the signatures."
Gingrich, Perry disqualified from Va. primary ballot - Virginia Politics - The Washington Post
lol, CNN isnt a news source when it contradicts you?
lololol
"On Wednesday, Gingrich assured a crowd of supporters he had met the threshold for appearing on the ballot, saying he had gathered anywhere from 12,000 to 14,000 signatures."
There you go again with the stupid, listening to Gingrich.
This isn't something up for debate, fuckwit. The number of signatures delivered is a fixed & known number. It was 11,050.
Gingrich failed. Man enough up and accept it.