MindWars
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2016
- 42,227
- 10,746
- 2,040
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
How??I'll be watching and waiting. Forgive me if I'm skeptical about a few aspects of this. I predict that without the mandate, too few people will sign up voluntarily to support the more popular provision of the ACA. I also do not trust the insurers to put people before profits if regulations are loosened..They're discussing it now. Provide people with tax rebates instead of a mandate, allow interstate competition, and encourage, not drive out insurance companies to participate. It will be system based on accurate numbers and calculations, not based on lies, deception, and politics as was Obamacare.Please explain how insurers will be able to cover pre existing conditions without the mandates requiring healthy people to buy insurance, and government subsidies to allow people to buy insurance who could not otherwise afford it.Repeal and replace. The no pre existing conditions and children up to 26 can be on their parents plan were conditions that republicans were in favor of from the beginning, before the Dems decided to steamroll their monstrosity that should be called UCA - unafordable care act.
The govt or the insurers are two sides of the same coin. Trump will force the insurers to compete with each other to the benefit of the public.
When insurance companies have to compete it drives the prices down . Because in order to gain consumers what is the first thing ppl do they look for the cheapest price but yet want good quality.
Take cars for example, If you could buy a bran new car at a cheaper price because lot A has a truck/car for ten thousand lets say, and lot B has the same truck for twelve thousand who will gain more people on the lots?