United Nations B/S

[Grandma]

Is Africana a language? I heard this today from a friend of mine, who said he ran in to a foriegn exchange pilot (never heard of this) who flies F-16's, and is in this country right now training as some part of the UN mission or something. He said the guy couldn't tell him much at all, because alot of it was secret.

Was the pilot Russian...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...t-reichstag-event-to-trigger-martial-law.html

He said the guy was white and had what he thought was a Russian language or accent when he spoke, but when he asked him what it was (the accent), the pilot said it was Africana.. Me and my friend had never heard of this language before when he told me about it. There were 3 black bars on his shoulder, and my friend said that this is what also made him curious, because he had never seen this before on an f-16 flight suit that was American. The pilot wouldn't answer hardly any questions my friend would ask him, but only that he was here training. My friend is a former marine who served in the Iraq Desert Storm, and finished his service in the Airforce when he came back home.

It's Afrikaans. Guess what country. Hint: Not Russia or former Eastern Block.

 

[Grandma]

This thread is why children shouldn't be allowed on the internet.

The UN has been asked to monitor the elections in some states because in those states there have been cases of voter intimidation as well as voter supression by the far right wing group True the Vote, who have appeared at the polls unsolicited and without permission. True the Vote groups have tried for months to keep non-republicans off the voter rolls.

The fact is that the right wing extremists are violating the Constitution. Why do you support them? Why do you hate America?

why cant America handle their own elections?......we have always had Right Wing Extremist....was the UN monitoring us when Blacks were given the vote?.....if someone wants to fuck with the Elections you just let everyone know this shit will not be tolerated and you will not like the results of you attempting to mess with them.....basically use the old Zero Tolerance method.....and come down HARD on those who do.....

Wonder why they didn't want UN inspectors during the acorn debacle, oh I forgot, acorn was working for the criminalcrats...

ACORN was never accused of spying into the actual voting booths, trying to get legitimate voters knocked off the rolls, gathering in thug gangs and blocking lines of voters, nor distracting and bothering poll workers at busy polling locations. The Teabaggers have been.

There were only 2, count 'em TWO Black Panthers and they were at a single polling station.

The teabaggers have no authorization to monitor the polls, and are under investigation in several states for physical intimidation and for attempting voter supression in several states for the past couple of years. They've vowed to send a million jackboots to polling stations this November to disrupt the voting process.

The UN didn't just up and decide to come in, a number of civil rights groups ASKED them to monitor this year's general election.

 

[American_Jihad]

Was the pilot Russian...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...t-reichstag-event-to-trigger-martial-law.html

He said the guy was white and had what he thought was a Russian language or accent when he spoke, but when he asked him what it was (the accent), the pilot said it was Africana.. Me and my friend had never heard of this language before when he told me about it. There were 3 black bars on his shoulder, and my friend said that this is what also made him curious, because he had never seen this before on an f-16 flight suit that was American. The pilot wouldn't answer hardly any questions my friend would ask him, but only that he was here training. My friend is a former marine who served in the Iraq Desert Storm, and finished his service in the Airforce when he came back home.

It's Afrikaans. Guess what country. Hint: Not Russia or former Eastern Block.

Religion - Afrikaners

 

[American_Jihad]

why cant America handle their own elections?......we have always had Right Wing Extremist....was the UN monitoring us when Blacks were given the vote?.....if someone wants to fuck with the Elections you just let everyone know this shit will not be tolerated and you will not like the results of you attempting to mess with them.....basically use the old Zero Tolerance method.....and come down HARD on those who do.....

Wonder why they didn't want UN inspectors during the acorn debacle, oh I forgot, acorn was working for the criminalcrats...

ACORN was never accused of spying into the actual voting booths, trying to get legitimate voters knocked off the rolls, gathering in thug gangs and blocking lines of voters, nor distracting and bothering poll workers at busy polling locations. The Teabaggers have been.

There were only 2, count 'em TWO Black Panthers and they were at a single polling station.

The teabaggers have no authorization to monitor the polls, and are under investigation in several states for physical intimidation and for attempting voter supression in several states for the past couple of years. They've vowed to send a million jackboots to polling stations this November to disrupt the voting process.

The UN didn't just up and decide to come in, a number of civil rights groups ASKED them to monitor this year's general election.

Need proof stating tea party million jackboots, links. Teabaggers, that's a LGBT thing, I'm surprised a lefty gets them mixed up...rolmao

 

[freedombecki]

ACORN was never accused of spying into the actual voting booths, trying to get legitimate voters knocked off the rolls, gathering in thug gangs and blocking lines of voters, nor distracting and bothering poll workers at busy polling locations. The Teabaggers have been.

There were only 2, count 'em TWO Black Panthers and they were at a single polling station.

The teabaggers have no authorization to monitor the polls, and are under investigation in several states for physical intimidation and for attempting voter supression in several states for the past couple of years. They've vowed to send a million jackboots to polling stations this November to disrupt the voting process.

The UN didn't just up and decide to come in, a number of civil rights groups ASKED them to monitor this year's general election.

Judicial watch has found the following irregularities with people with a vested interest in disrupting truth-in-voting as follows:

Election Integrity Is Under Assault

The integrity of the 2012 elections is under systematic assault by leftist activists and politicians whose objective is clearly to manipulate the 2012 elections for their own gain. Judicial Watch investigators have evidence that special interests, government entities, and even the current administration are:

Refusing to force states to clean their voter rolls of deceased and moved voters;

Fighting state efforts to require voters to show a photo ID at the polls;

Failing to enforce our federal laws against illegal immigration and effectively ending the deportation of illegal aliens, thereby swelling the population of potential illegal voters.

And as Judicial Watch uncovers more and more evidence of the breadth and scale of this effort, it is becoming clear that the objective of what we are seeing reaches far beyond the results of the 2012 election. That’s why Judicial Watch is taking action by suing states to force them to clean their voter rolls. We invite you to join our effort now by taking action to support our 2012 Election Integrity Project. link

Are you being used by your party to manipulate the 2012 election to disenfranchise the true vote count and insert extra ballots illegally?

The Democrat House of Cards is getting ready to have its anchor card removed--stolen elections.

And that's just too bad.

 

[WilliamLaSalle]

United Nations Human Rights Council lately has included nations like these: China, Nigeria, Madagascar, Algeria, Egypt, Malaysia, Libya, Kenya, Qatar, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Malaysia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.

Countries have sought membership of the Commission not to strengthen human rights but to protect themselves against criticism or to criticize others.

Jul 6, 2012 – Syria is Running for Seat on UN Human Rights Council and May Win.

Odd that the nations in the council have the worst records on human rights and very little personal freedom isn't it ?

Women and children in some of these countries have no rights at all.

We have decided the United Nations should monitor our election in the United States in 2012. Although their human rights records are horrible and continue to be horrible today, I am sure they will do all they can to insure we have an honest election.

2012 group
* African States: Cameroon, Djibouti, Mauritius, Nigeria and Senegal.
* Asian States: Bangladesh, China, Jordan, Kyrgystan and Saudi Arabia.
* Eastern European States: Hungary and the Russian Federation.
* Latin American & Caribbean States: Cuba, Mexico and Uruguay.
* Western European & Other States: United States, Belgium, Norway and Turkey.

 

[American_Jihad]

Senate to vote on U.N. Treaty: Rights of Persons with Disabilities

12/3/12

Glenn has been trying to take a break and recharge from politics because of how trying he believe the next four years are going to be. But today he had to get back in the game.

Glenn explained to his radio audience this morning that tomorrow the Senate will vote on the U.N.’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).

“I urge you to call the Senate and beg them to vote against this,” Glenn emphasized. Later adding, “This will impact every parent and every — every parent of a disabled child and every disabled person in America. Let alone the world. It is already passed the Senate committee. It is about to go to the floor of the Senate and it must be stopped.”

Only 34 senators are needed to block the treaty that in Article 18, Section 2 states that all “children with disabilities shall be registered immediately after birth.”

---
Senate to vote on U.N. Treaty: Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Glenn Beck

---

Disability Treaty – Motion to Proceed - Vote Agreed to (61-36, 3 Not Voting)

The Senate agreed to proceed to consideration of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a United Nations treaty meant to outline the rights of disabled individuals and create a framework for implementing plans to protect those rights. The treaty contains language outlining the “general obligations” of signatory nations vis a vis their disabled citizens as well as sections on issues ranging from independent living to human dignity. There is currently an agreement in place to vote on ratification of the treaty on Tuesday, December 4.

U.S. Senate

Former GOP presidential candidate and former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) (L) speaks about his opposition to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities during a news conference with his wife Karen Santorum as she holds their daughter, Isabella, at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill November 26. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)​

 

[RoadVirus]

Senate to vote on U.N. Treaty: Rights of Persons with Disabilities

12/3/12

Glenn has been trying to take a break and recharge from politics because of how trying he believe the next four years are going to be. But today he had to get back in the game.

Glenn explained to his radio audience this morning that tomorrow the Senate will vote on the U.N.’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).

“I urge you to call the Senate and beg them to vote against this,” Glenn emphasized. Later adding, “This will impact every parent and every — every parent of a disabled child and every disabled person in America. Let alone the world. It is already passed the Senate committee. It is about to go to the floor of the Senate and it must be stopped.”

Only 34 senators are needed to block the treaty that in Article 18, Section 2 states that all “children with disabilities shall be registered immediately after birth.”

---
Senate to vote on U.N. Treaty: Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Glenn Beck

---

Disability Treaty – Motion to Proceed - Vote Agreed to (61-36, 3 Not Voting)

The Senate agreed to proceed to consideration of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a United Nations treaty meant to outline the rights of disabled individuals and create a framework for implementing plans to protect those rights. The treaty contains language outlining the “general obligations” of signatory nations vis a vis their disabled citizens as well as sections on issues ranging from independent living to human dignity. There is currently an agreement in place to vote on ratification of the treaty on Tuesday, December 4.

U.S. Senate

Former GOP presidential candidate and former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) (L) speaks about his opposition to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities during a news conference with his wife Karen Santorum as she holds their daughter, Isabella, at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill November 26. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)​

The UN isn't happy unless it has a "treaty" giving it some say in something. Guns, disabled people, taxes, education, Internet. Welcome to the New World Order, brought to you by the United Nations, the One World Government.

 

[American_Jihad]

Senate rejects United Nations treaty for disabled rights in a 61-38 vote

By Ramsey Cox and Julian Pecquet
12/04/12 12:29

A United Nations treaty to ban discrimination against people with disabilities went down to defeat in the Senate on Tuesday in a 61-38 vote.

The treaty, backed by President Obama and former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kan.), fell five votes short of the two-thirds majority needed for confirmation as dozens of Senate Republicans objected that it would create new abortion rights and impede the ability of people to homeschool disabled children.

---
Senate rejects United Nations treaty for disabled rights in a 61-38 vote - The Hill's Global Affairs

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Not surprising that nut job rw's hate an organization whose only purpose is to promote peace.

Not surprising a moron like this believes the UN's only purpose is to promote peace........comical

 

[American_Jihad]

Cloward–Piven strategy

Senator: ‘Obama Quietly Handing Over Billions of Dollars to UN in Name of Global Warming’ ​

Thursday, December 6, 2012


While all of the attention today in Washington is on the looming fiscal cliff, President Obama’s administration is quietly handing over billions of dollars to the United Nations in the name of global warming.

Hello, I am Senator Jim Inhofe, Republican Senator from Oklahoma, Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, and chief critic of President Obama’s far left green agenda
---


Post Continues on epw.senate.gov


Read more: Senator: ‘Obama Quietly Handing Over Billions of Dollars to UN in Name of Global Warming’ – Patriot Update

 

[AmyNation]

Consertives see the UN and think Firefly, Liberals see the UN and think Star Trek.

 

[American_Jihad]

Consertives see the UN and think Firefly, Liberals see the UN and think Star Trek.

Hey don't forget the utopian fantasy dreamland...

 

[gwennie]

Not surprising that nut job rw's hate an organization whose only purpose is to promote peace.

Only thing worse than the UN is that horrible ACLU whose only purpose is to protect our Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

You really are a nut job. You, and the whole left wing radical element are crazy as loons.

 

[American_Jihad]

UN Proposes “Food Redistribution” from US and Europe through “Swift and Collective Action”​

February 22, 2013
By Daniel Greenfield

If you loved wealth redistribution, remember that money is just the tip of the redistribution iceberg. In the USSR, wealth redistribution gave way to food redistribution. And the UNSSR is moving along that same road.

The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) – has issued a new report called Our Nutrient World: The challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution.

People in the rich world should become “demitarians” – eating half as much meat as usual, while stopping short of giving it up – in order to avoid severe environmental damage, scientists have urged.

Sutton was speaking about the rich west, the US and Europe in particular. He wants the change in diet to be pioneered in Europe, as the US will be a tougher nut to crack.

The UN scientists said people in poor countries should be allowed to increase their consumption of animal protein, which billions of people are lacking. But if that is so as not to cause environmental harm, the move to meat in the developing world must be balanced with a reduction in the amount consumed in developed countries.

Mark Sutton is apparently an environmental physicist which qualifies him to propose a new Marxist diet.

...

UN Proposes ?Food Redistribution? from US and Europe through ?Swift and Collective Action?

 

[American_Jihad]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3qtpdSQox0]MSNBC Host Melissa Harris-Perry » All Your Kids Belong To Us - YouTube[/ame]

The UN wants to dictate how parents raise kids​

by Gramfan
February 24, 2013

...

AGENDA 21 & PARENTAL RIGHT

To ensure that there are sufficient up and coming supporters of the United Nations Global Governance agenda, the indoctrination of our children is of the utmost importance to that organization. We already see erosion of national pride being actively pursued in schools and universities.

Socialist values are being encouraged as national pride takes a back seat to the wants of the ‘Global’ family. The raising of our national flag is discouraged on the excuse that some within our failed multicultural society may be offended. The singing of the National Anthem and the saying of prayers in schools has also been abandoned for the same reason. Non-denominational religious teachings in schools has also suffered the same fate, and Christmas is being turned into Happy Holidays to placate the sensibilities of those who don’t now and never will belong in our society. The greatest insult to our national pride comes from a bureaucracy that has determined ANZAC Day to be divisive. That is laughable and a grave insult to all patriotic Australians.

The United Nations has created yet another convention, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, or CRC. Left-wing socialist governments are keen to turn this “convention” into a treaty because they know it is extremely difficult to extract one’s self from that situation even if they lose the next election.

...

The United States present administration, including Muslim sympathizer Obama and Kevin Rudd’s very good friend Hilary Clinton are very much in favour of the CRC and are pushing to have it ratified this year and make no mistake, our government will follow suit to remain in step with the US and fulfill what it sees as its obligations to the UN within the context of Agenda 21.

http://1389blog.com/2013/02/24/the-un-wants-to-dictate-how-parents-raise-kids/


...

 

[American_Jihad]

U.N. Leader: U.S. ‘Israel First Ethos’ to Blame for Boston Bombing


April 24, 2013
By Joseph Klein

While our nation continues to deal with the aftermath of the Boston Marathon terrorist bombings, which killed three people and wounded more than 260, jihadists and their sympathizers gloat, rationalize or turn the blame for the bombings back onto the United States and Israel. Leftists, who were so quick to accuse Tea Party members or right wingers for the bombings, have remained mostly silent as the truth of the Islamist roots of the bombing suspects became known.

The suspects, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, now dead, and his younger brother, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, now in custody, were described by one U.S. government official as “aspiring jihadists.” They were led to their alleged evil act by their understanding of their Muslim faith. Tellingly, on the Russian social networking site Vkontakte, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev described his world view as “Islam.”

...

Members of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah were “dancing in the streets of Gaza, handing out candies to passerbys,” according to the Israeli News Agency. Mohammad al-Chalabi, the head of the Muslim Salafi group, which is a jihadist group headquartered in Jordan, proclaimed that he was “happy to see the horror in America.”
...

Richard Falk – a top official of the United Nations Human Rights Council, who quoted these callers in his Foreign Policy Journal article, entitled “A Commentary on the Marathon Murders” – looked at the Boston terrorist attacks as an understandable reaction to the “American global domination project.”

Falk brought Israel into his discussion. “As long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and justice in the world should not rest easy,” Falk wrote. And he took verbal shots at Israel’s “belligerent leader, Bibi Netanyahu” and at President Obama for “succumbing to the Beltway ethos of Israel First.”

...

These jihadists bear total responsibility for their evil actions, which were inspired by their evil ideology, not the country that took them in and gave them so much.

U.N. Leader: U.S. ?Israel First Ethos? to Blame for Boston Bombing | FrontPage Magazine

 

[The Irish Ram]

The United Nations Treaty is Unconstitutional


The history of how the United Nations was created is a classic case of diplomacy by deception. The United Nations is the successor to the defunct League of Nations, the first attempt to set up a One World Government in the wake of the Paris Peace Conference which gave birth to the Treaty of Versailles.

Treaty of Versailles:Pawns in the Game - 10

In the case of the United States, the plan is not to overthrow the U.S. government or its Constitution, but to "make it negligible." This has largely been accomplished by slowly and carefully implementing the socialist manifesto written in 1920 by the Fabian Society, which was based on the Communist Manifesto of 1848.

Isn't this making of the Constitution "negligible" exactly what is happening? In fact when the U.S. government violates the Constitution on an almost daily basis with total impunity, it makes the Constitution "negligible." Executive orders, such as going to war without a declaration of war, as in the Gulf War, have worked to make the Constitution "negligible." There is absolutely no provision in the Constitution for executive orders. Executive orders are only proclamations which the president has no power or authority to make. Only a king can make proclamations.

The warmed over League of Nations was thrust upon the U.S. Senate in 1945, dressed under a new label: the United Nations Treaty. The senators were given only three days to discuss the implications of the treaty, which could not have been fully examined in under least a full 18 months of discussion. Had the senators properly understood what they were discussing, which, apart from a few exceptions, they did not, there would have been a demand for a proper period for discussion. The fact is that the Senate did not understand the document and therefore should not have voted on it.

Had the senators who debated the United Nations treaty properly understood the document it surely would have been rejected. Apart from any other considerations, the document was so poorly written and, in many instances, so vague, deceptive and contradictory, that it could have been rejected on these grounds alone.

A law, which is what a treaty is, must be clearly written and unambiguous. The U.N. Treaty was far from that. In any case, the United States, bound by its Constitution, could not ratify the U.N. treaty, for the following reasons:

1) Our Constitution rests upon the bedrock of sovereignty, without which there can be no constitution. U.S. foreign policy is based upon Vattel's "Law of Nations" which makes sovereignty the issue. Although the Constitution is silent on world government and foreign bodies, when the Constitution is silent of a power, and it is not incidental to another power in the Constitution, then it is an inhibition of that power, or a PROHIBITION of that power.

2)The United Nations is not a sovereign body, having no measurable territory of its own. It is housed on U.S. territory in New York in a building loaned by the Rockefellers. Under the U.S. Constitution, we cannot make a treaty with any nation or body that lacks sovereignty. The United States could not (and cannot) make a treaty with a body or country having no sovereignty. The U.S. can make an agreement with a country or body having no sovereignty, but can never enter into a treaty with a body lacking in sovereignty.

3) For the Senate to have attempted to ratify a treaty with a body, state, or country lacking sovereignty, defined boundaries, demographics, a currency system, a set of laws or a constitution, to whit, the United Nations, was to betray the oath to uphold the Constitution which senators are sworn to do. This is commonly called treason.

4)In order for the United States to become a member of the United Nations, two amendments to the Constitution would have to be passed. The first amendment would have to recognize that a world body exists. In its present form, the Constitution cannot recognize the United Nations as a world body. A second amendment would have to say that the United States can have a treaty relationship with an unsovereign world body. Neither amendment was ever offered, much less accepted by the Senate and ratified by all of the States.

Thus, the thoroughly suspect U.N. "treaty" never was a legal law in the United States. As matters stood in 1945, and as they stand today, although the President has the power to have a say in foreign affairs, he does not have the power, nor has he ever had the power, to make an agreement — much less a treaty — with a world body. This absolutely means that no other world body, specifically, the United Nations, has jurisdiction to deploy American servicemen and women, or to order the United States to act outside of the Constitutional restrictions imposed by our Founding Fathers.

Source Link: Diplomacy By Deception by Dr. John Coleman

In the case of the United States, the plan is not to overthrow the U.S. government or its Constitution, but to "make it negligible."

^ Thank you so much for that.

They are very patient, but time is running out. Soros wants it and he wants it now. They need to set up what the Bible said they would set up, that no man may buy or sell.......
The UN's frontrunner for Life Term President of the UN, just made sure that our medical records and prescriptions are at their disposal. That was huge. They also have our bank records, our locations at any time, our ownership of any defensive weapons that could be used against them, our internet information, cell phone information, and more. They need to control all of those areas.

And now, they will convince us that drones hovering above us "thwarting crime" is a good thing, and won't infringe on anyone's privacy, honest.....

The list you mentioned are snags for them. Look at the 2nd one:

We are signing UN world encompassing Treaties, which are the UN's Constitution. Those Laws can only trump ours if the UN was a sovereign Nation.
UN solution:
The UN has just petitioned for Sovereign Nation status, as a territory without borders.
Our last four presidents (and many more before them) are UN globalists. Their loyalties lie beyond this country.
The masses are being fooled. And Halliburton is building "detention centers" for those that aren't.

 

[American_Jihad]

Obama's United Nations Backdoor to Gun Control

Luckily, the Constitution gives the Senate exclusive power to ratify, or block, the Arms Trade Treaty..

April 14, 2013

Even before his most ambitious gun-control proposals were falling by the wayside, President Obama was turning for help to the United Nations. On April 2, the United States led 154 nations to approve the Arms Trade Treaty in the U.N. General Assembly. While much of the treaty governs the international sale of conventional weapons, its regulation of small arms would provide American gun-control advocates with a new tool for restricting rights. Yet because the Constitution requires that two-thirds of the Senate give its advice and consent to any treaty, Second Amendment supporters still have a political route to stop the administration.

...

Yet, as with many utopian devices, the treaty fails the test of enforcement. Some of the world's largest arms traffickers either voted against the agreement or abstained. The U.S., quite rightly, already has the world's most serious export controls in place, while nations such as North Korea, Syria, Iran, Russia and China will continue to traffic in arms with abandon.

But the new treaty also demands domestic regulation of "small arms and light weapons." The treaty's Article 5 requires nations to "establish and maintain a national control system," including a "national control list." Article 10 requires signatories "to regulate brokering" of conventional arms. The treaty offers no guarantee for individual rights, but instead only declares it is "mindful" of the "legitimate trade and lawful ownership" of arms for"recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities." Not a word about the right to possess guns for a broader individual right of self-defense.

...

The Senate should block this latest effort to evade the Constitution's controls on federal power. There could be no greater justification for senators to exercise their veto over treaties than the cause of protecting the individual liberties of Americans—including the right to bear arms.

John Bolton and John Yoo: Obama's U.N. Backdoor Route to Gun Control - WSJ.com

 

[Grandma]

Why isn't this in the conspiracy forum?