Uh-ooohh Spaghettios... the US in ten year cooling trend?

[OohPooPahDoo]

AGWCult Logic: The USA's cooling has no meaning in terms of "Global" warming, because we're only 1.5% of the worlds total area (including the Pacific Oyster Eating Blob), but a rain storm in Texas which is only .13% of the total mass is proof of manmade global climate warming change or whatever they're calling it today

OK?

Got that?

We never said that though. You did.

uh, no your side did:
credit old crocks:

From rainy Texas to scorching India this has been a month of strange weather around the world Fox News

WASHINGTON – Even for a world getting used to wild weather, May seems stuck on strange.

Torrential downpours in Texas that have whiplashed the region from drought to flooding. A heat wave that has killed more than 1,800 people in India. Record 91-degree readings in Alaska, of all places. A pair of top-of-the-scale typhoons in the Northwest Pacific. And a drought taking hold in the East.

"Mother Nature keeps throwing us crazy stuff," Rutgers University climate scientist Jennifer Francis says. "It's just been one thing after another."

Jerry Meehl, an extreme-weather expert at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, points out that May is usually a pretty extreme month, with lots of tornadoes and downpours. Even so, he says, this has been "kind of unusually intense."

The word "stuck" provides one possible explanation.

Francis, Meehl and some other meteorologists say the jet stream is in a rut, not moving nasty weather along. The high-speed, constantly shifting river of air 30,000 feet above Earth normally guides storms around the globe, but sometimes splits and comes back together somewhere else.


A stuck jet stream, with a bit of a split, explains the extremes in Texas, India, Alaska and the U.S. East, but not the typhoons, Francis says.

Other possible factors contributing to May's wild weather: the periodic warming of the central Pacific known as El Nino, climate change and natural variability, scientists say.

Those damned liberals at Fox, will they never shut up?

Nice linking skills. Unfortunately the article doesn't actually say what you claim it says.

 

[jc456]

AGWCult Logic: The USA's cooling has no meaning in terms of "Global" warming, because we're only 1.5% of the worlds total area (including the Pacific Oyster Eating Blob), but a rain storm in Texas which is only .13% of the total mass is proof of manmade global climate warming change or whatever they're calling it today

OK?

Got that?

We never said that though. You did.

uh, no your side did:
credit old crocks:

From rainy Texas to scorching India this has been a month of strange weather around the world Fox News

WASHINGTON – Even for a world getting used to wild weather, May seems stuck on strange.

Torrential downpours in Texas that have whiplashed the region from drought to flooding. A heat wave that has killed more than 1,800 people in India. Record 91-degree readings in Alaska, of all places. A pair of top-of-the-scale typhoons in the Northwest Pacific. And a drought taking hold in the East.

"Mother Nature keeps throwing us crazy stuff," Rutgers University climate scientist Jennifer Francis says. "It's just been one thing after another."

Jerry Meehl, an extreme-weather expert at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, points out that May is usually a pretty extreme month, with lots of tornadoes and downpours. Even so, he says, this has been "kind of unusually intense."

The word "stuck" provides one possible explanation.

Francis, Meehl and some other meteorologists say the jet stream is in a rut, not moving nasty weather along. The high-speed, constantly shifting river of air 30,000 feet above Earth normally guides storms around the globe, but sometimes splits and comes back together somewhere else.


A stuck jet stream, with a bit of a split, explains the extremes in Texas, India, Alaska and the U.S. East, but not the typhoons, Francis says.

Other possible factors contributing to May's wild weather: the periodic warming of the central Pacific known as El Nino, climate change and natural variability, scientists say.

Those damned liberals at Fox, will they never shut up?

Nice linking skills. Unfortunately the article doesn't actually say what you claim it says.

uh, yeah it does.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

AGWCult Logic: The USA's cooling has no meaning in terms of "Global" warming, because we're only 1.5% of the worlds total area (including the Pacific Oyster Eating Blob), but a rain storm in Texas which is only .13% of the total mass is proof of manmade global climate warming change or whatever they're calling it today

OK?

Got that?

We never said that though. You did.

uh, no your side did:
credit old crocks:

From rainy Texas to scorching India this has been a month of strange weather around the world Fox News

WASHINGTON – Even for a world getting used to wild weather, May seems stuck on strange.

Torrential downpours in Texas that have whiplashed the region from drought to flooding. A heat wave that has killed more than 1,800 people in India. Record 91-degree readings in Alaska, of all places. A pair of top-of-the-scale typhoons in the Northwest Pacific. And a drought taking hold in the East.

"Mother Nature keeps throwing us crazy stuff," Rutgers University climate scientist Jennifer Francis says. "It's just been one thing after another."

Jerry Meehl, an extreme-weather expert at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, points out that May is usually a pretty extreme month, with lots of tornadoes and downpours. Even so, he says, this has been "kind of unusually intense."

The word "stuck" provides one possible explanation.

Francis, Meehl and some other meteorologists say the jet stream is in a rut, not moving nasty weather along. The high-speed, constantly shifting river of air 30,000 feet above Earth normally guides storms around the globe, but sometimes splits and comes back together somewhere else.


A stuck jet stream, with a bit of a split, explains the extremes in Texas, India, Alaska and the U.S. East, but not the typhoons, Francis says.

Other possible factors contributing to May's wild weather: the periodic warming of the central Pacific known as El Nino, climate change and natural variability, scientists say.

Those damned liberals at Fox, will they never shut up?

Nice linking skills. Unfortunately the article doesn't actually say what you claim it says.

uh, yeah it does.

Nowhere in your linked article is it claimed that global warming is proven by a rain storm in Texas. You either cannot read or are stupid.

Global warming is "proven" by the fact that the globe is getting warmer.

No Pause in Global Warming - Scientific American

Duh.

 

[jc456]

AGWCult Logic: The USA's cooling has no meaning in terms of "Global" warming, because we're only 1.5% of the worlds total area (including the Pacific Oyster Eating Blob), but a rain storm in Texas which is only .13% of the total mass is proof of manmade global climate warming change or whatever they're calling it today

OK?

Got that?

We never said that though. You did.

uh, no your side did:
credit old crocks:

From rainy Texas to scorching India this has been a month of strange weather around the world Fox News

WASHINGTON – Even for a world getting used to wild weather, May seems stuck on strange.

Torrential downpours in Texas that have whiplashed the region from drought to flooding. A heat wave that has killed more than 1,800 people in India. Record 91-degree readings in Alaska, of all places. A pair of top-of-the-scale typhoons in the Northwest Pacific. And a drought taking hold in the East.

"Mother Nature keeps throwing us crazy stuff," Rutgers University climate scientist Jennifer Francis says. "It's just been one thing after another."

Jerry Meehl, an extreme-weather expert at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, points out that May is usually a pretty extreme month, with lots of tornadoes and downpours. Even so, he says, this has been "kind of unusually intense."

The word "stuck" provides one possible explanation.

Francis, Meehl and some other meteorologists say the jet stream is in a rut, not moving nasty weather along. The high-speed, constantly shifting river of air 30,000 feet above Earth normally guides storms around the globe, but sometimes splits and comes back together somewhere else.


A stuck jet stream, with a bit of a split, explains the extremes in Texas, India, Alaska and the U.S. East, but not the typhoons, Francis says.

Other possible factors contributing to May's wild weather: the periodic warming of the central Pacific known as El Nino, climate change and natural variability, scientists say.

Those damned liberals at Fox, will they never shut up?

Nice linking skills. Unfortunately the article doesn't actually say what you claim it says.

uh, yeah it does.

Nowhere in your linked article is it claimed that global warming is proven by a rain storm in Texas. You either cannot read or are stupid.

Global warming is "proven" by the fact that the globe is getting warmer.

No Pause in Global Warming - Scientific American

Duh.

why post it on the thread if it wasn't Old rocks intent!! It is old rocks who was using it. Think first. you asked who posted something, I showed you who! What other implied point is there to take away from his post?

 

[JFK_USA]

The USA is not the entire world you idiot

 

[westwall]

Area of the continental US: 7,663,941.7 km2
Area of the Earth: 510,100,000 km2
RATIO: 1.5%

Most heavily recorded. And amazingly enough GLOBAL temps are just that. The claim that MWP was local to Europe is simply stupid. What could possibly keep a warm bubble over one spot of a spinning Earth?

The same holds true for these temp records. Yes, the US is a small part of the globe, it is however part of the GLOBE and once again the claim that the US has a bubble of cold that somehow magically stays in one place is simply retarded.

 

[edthecynic]

The claim that MWP was local to Europe is simply stupid. What could possibly keep a warm bubble over one spot of a spinning Earth?

Yeah there can't possibly be anything like a jet stream.

 

[Zander]

Climate Alarmism is a religious cult. When the observed facts do not fit the established dogma, change the facts!! If that is not plausible, change the dogma!! Hence Global Warming has morphed into "Climate change". That covers all bases!! If it's cold, climate change!! If it's warm, climate change!! if it's unchanged, Climate change!!!

 

[jc456]

The claim that MWP was local to Europe is simply stupid. What could possibly keep a warm bubble over one spot of a spinning Earth?

Yeah there can't possibly be anything like a jet stream.

don't you think maybe that was ww's point? oh my gawd the stupid with you guys,

 

[edthecynic]

Climate Alarmism is a religious cult. When the observed facts do not fit the established dogma, change the facts!! If that is not plausible, change the dogma!! Hence Global Warming has morphed into "Climate change". That covers all bases!! If it's cold, climate change!! If it's warm, climate change!! if it's unchanged, Climate change!!!

How is that possible when the term "climate change" appeared almost 20 years BEFORE the term "global warming?"

The term "climate change first appeared in 1956, the physicist Gilbert Plass published a seminal study called "The Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climatic Change." The term ‘global warming’ was first used in a 1975 Science article by geochemist Wallace Broecker of Columbia University. He wrote a paper called "Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming.”

 

[edthecynic]

The claim that MWP was local to Europe is simply stupid. What could possibly keep a warm bubble over one spot of a spinning Earth?

Yeah there can't possibly be anything like a jet stream.

don't you think maybe that was ww's point? oh my gawd the stupid with you guys,

So you are saying that the jet stream does not at times follow a pattern that causes warm or cold spots to stay in a general location.

 

[jc456]

The claim that MWP was local to Europe is simply stupid. What could possibly keep a warm bubble over one spot of a spinning Earth?

Yeah there can't possibly be anything like a jet stream.

don't you think maybe that was ww's point? oh my gawd the stupid with you guys,

So you are saying that the jet stream does not at times follow a pattern that causes warm or cold spots to stay in a general location.

I'm saying jet streams moves the air around the globe. any issue with that? I suppose you needed to know what the thread was about.

 

[edthecynic]

The claim that MWP was local to Europe is simply stupid. What could possibly keep a warm bubble over one spot of a spinning Earth?

Yeah there can't possibly be anything like a jet stream.

don't you think maybe that was ww's point? oh my gawd the stupid with you guys,

So you are saying that the jet stream does not at times follow a pattern that causes warm or cold spots to stay in a general location.

I'm saying jet streams moves the air around the globe. any issue with that? I suppose you needed to know what the thread was about.

Jet streams move air in specific patterns causing hot spots and cold spots, not willy-nilly haphazardly distributing air evenly anywhere and everywhere as you imply.

 

[jc456]

The claim that MWP was local to Europe is simply stupid. What could possibly keep a warm bubble over one spot of a spinning Earth?

Yeah there can't possibly be anything like a jet stream.

don't you think maybe that was ww's point? oh my gawd the stupid with you guys,

So you are saying that the jet stream does not at times follow a pattern that causes warm or cold spots to stay in a general location.

I'm saying jet streams moves the air around the globe. any issue with that? I suppose you needed to know what the thread was about.

Jet streams move air in specific patterns causing hot spots and cold spots, not willy-nilly haphazardly distributing air evenly anywhere and everywhere as you imply.

and hence the 's' on the end of stream. Referencing more than one. And jet streams ( again the 's' meaning more than one) move air to more than one country.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

We never said that though. You did.

uh, no your side did:
credit old crocks:

From rainy Texas to scorching India this has been a month of strange weather around the world Fox News

WASHINGTON – Even for a world getting used to wild weather, May seems stuck on strange.

Torrential downpours in Texas that have whiplashed the region from drought to flooding. A heat wave that has killed more than 1,800 people in India. Record 91-degree readings in Alaska, of all places. A pair of top-of-the-scale typhoons in the Northwest Pacific. And a drought taking hold in the East.

"Mother Nature keeps throwing us crazy stuff," Rutgers University climate scientist Jennifer Francis says. "It's just been one thing after another."

Jerry Meehl, an extreme-weather expert at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, points out that May is usually a pretty extreme month, with lots of tornadoes and downpours. Even so, he says, this has been "kind of unusually intense."

The word "stuck" provides one possible explanation.

Francis, Meehl and some other meteorologists say the jet stream is in a rut, not moving nasty weather along. The high-speed, constantly shifting river of air 30,000 feet above Earth normally guides storms around the globe, but sometimes splits and comes back together somewhere else.


A stuck jet stream, with a bit of a split, explains the extremes in Texas, India, Alaska and the U.S. East, but not the typhoons, Francis says.

Other possible factors contributing to May's wild weather: the periodic warming of the central Pacific known as El Nino, climate change and natural variability, scientists say.

Those damned liberals at Fox, will they never shut up?

Nice linking skills. Unfortunately the article doesn't actually say what you claim it says.

uh, yeah it does.

Nowhere in your linked article is it claimed that global warming is proven by a rain storm in Texas. You either cannot read or are stupid.

Global warming is "proven" by the fact that the globe is getting warmer.

No Pause in Global Warming - Scientific American

Duh.

why post it on the thread if it wasn't Old rocks intent!! It is old rocks who was using it. Think first. you asked who posted something, I showed you who! What other implied point is there to take away from his post?

You could take any implied point you like, when you're ready to discuss facts let me know.

 

[jc456]

uh, no your side did:
credit old crocks:

Nice linking skills. Unfortunately the article doesn't actually say what you claim it says.

uh, yeah it does.

Nowhere in your linked article is it claimed that global warming is proven by a rain storm in Texas. You either cannot read or are stupid.

Global warming is "proven" by the fact that the globe is getting warmer.

No Pause in Global Warming - Scientific American

Duh.

why post it on the thread if it wasn't Old rocks intent!! It is old rocks who was using it. Think first. you asked who posted something, I showed you who! What other implied point is there to take away from his post?

You could take any implied point you like, when you're ready to discuss facts let me know.

hah, you make that statement and yet can't make one factual point. Make one I dare you!

 

[Old Rocks]

The world is warming, the lower 48 may have seen a slight decline in temperatures in the last decade, but if you include Alaska in the US, we have seen a marked rise in temperature.

 

[IanC]

The world is warming, the lower 48 may have seen a slight decline in temperatures in the last decade, but if you include Alaska in the US, we have seen a marked rise in temperature.

I wasn't aware that the CRN didn't use the Alaskan stations for their calculations. Are you sure? How about the Hawaii stations?

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

The world is warming, the lower 48 may have seen a slight decline in temperatures in the last decade, but if you include Alaska in the US, we have seen a marked rise in temperature.

I wasn't aware that the CRN didn't use the Alaskan stations for their calculations. Are you sure? How about the Hawaii stations?

Do you know what the word "contiguous" means?

 

[IanC]

The world is warming, the lower 48 may have seen a slight decline in temperatures in the last decade, but if you include Alaska in the US, we have seen a marked rise in temperature.

I wasn't aware that the CRN didn't use the Alaskan stations for their calculations. Are you sure? How about the Hawaii stations?

Do you know what the word "contiguous" means?

Of course I know what conterminous means. The first couple of pages didn't show the graph.

I am interested in what the addition of Alaska and Hawaii would do to the trend. Got that?