U.S. Army should take control of American Govmnt, From President Obama.

I understand how you feel about a government imposing socialism onto the people but has it ever occurred to you that some people like socialism. I think a better solution that would allow everyone to live under the society they want is sucession from the union. Its a hypothetical proposal but can you imagine another that yields the greatest overall happiness of each citizen and maintains every citizen's right to live under the government they want.

Lets now imagine something a little less destructive to the nation such as state nullification of unconstitutional laws that go outside its delegated powers. Every state can then simply nullify whatever law they don't like and states that do like the socialist stuff can not nullify those federal laws. This way everyone is happy.

a little bit of socialism here and a little bit there is not a bad thing....its when it goes way overboard without any body keeping it in check .......kinda like here in California.....its out of control.... Entitlements galore .....and now these jerks dont know what to do and WILL NOT admit they fucked up....
 
I didn't read through all the posts but did read enough of them to be glad no one echoes the OP.

I don't like the decision to hold the trials in NYC. I don't like the direction Obama is taking the nation. Even so, as a retired Army officer, I would never support the US military taking away control of the government from elected officials. There are constitutional remedies for this in place.

The solution is simple: vote! If you didn't vote, then you really don't have much to complain about. Your silence was bad enough.
 
Well I am not the one trying to bring Homosexual marriage to America, its white men like you that are, so your asshole comment should be directed to your self.

I am protected by my free speech rights. I made no threats of violence so you can do your
bitch snitch act to the FBI, I really don't care.

I said a non shooting military take over.

Not only are you a traitorist bastard, you're an ignorant fool too. There are limits to free speech, anyone who completed a HS class in civics understands this; and only a moron believes an Army takeoever of our civilain govenment would not be violent. Maybe you could pled insanity, the DC sniper did and look what it got him.

Its liberal whimps like you, that want to take us back to the pre 9/11 mindset that made
America vulnerable in the first place.

You're not only stupid, you're a F'n chicken hawk too. Face to face you'd never call me a wimp; most likely you'd piss your pants and apologize - if you didn't cut and run first.
 
Hahahhaaaa.....what the fuck are people smoking? Having a trial in NYC is concern to be attacked.....but invading and occupying two nations that never attacked us generates no threat? Fucking hillbillies and the internet are not a good combination.

yeah! that's right dipshit, we were never attacked, what the hell are you smoking? oh and that black dude did not hit the white woman either? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

learn to read idiot, neither afghanistan or iraq attacked us, unlike us bombing iraq for an entire decade before deciding to not declare war (b/c the republican are too pussy to vote for shit they start) and send in thousands of troops in 03
 
Hahahhaaaa.....what the fuck are people smoking? Having a trial in NYC is concern to be attacked.....but invading and occupying two nations that never attacked us generates no threat? Fucking hillbillies and the internet are not a good combination.

yeah! that's right dipshit, we were never attacked, what the hell are you smoking? oh and that black dude did not hit the white woman either? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

learn to read idiot, neither afghanistan or iraq attacked us, unlike us bombing iraq for an entire decade before deciding to not declare war (b/c the republican are too pussy to vote for shit they start) and send in thousands of troops in 03

We went where the terrorists were blu. At least as far as Afghanistan is concerned. I have always thought of Iraq as taking our eye off the ball. Foreign policy is weird. We go into a contry because we think they are developing nuclear weapons. Then you have Bin Laden in Pakistan with known nukes and leave them alone. Hello???
 
yeah! that's right dipshit, we were never attacked, what the hell are you smoking? oh and that black dude did not hit the white woman either? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

learn to read idiot, neither afghanistan or iraq attacked us, unlike us bombing iraq for an entire decade before deciding to not declare war (b/c the republican are too pussy to vote for shit they start) and send in thousands of troops in 03

We went where the terrorists were blu. At least as far as Afghanistan is concerned. I have always thought of Iraq as taking our eye off the ball. Foreign policy is weird. We go into a contry because we think they are developing nuclear weapons. Then you have Bin Laden in Pakistan with known nukes and leave them alone. Hello???


Back in August 02' a CIA Bureau Chief went to DC to personally brief the Admin to point out Iraq didn't have wmd and was not pursuing nukes. Cheney even admitted in 06' he would have invaded iraq even if he knew wmd were not there....but he also said the same thing in Sept 2000......yet when that was pointed out to war supporters they wholly ignored it.

The majority of the hijackers came from saudi. Said arabia is also the world's largest financier of terrorism.....yet they are our ally. You can also read accounts of soldiers who pointed out while in afghanistan they didn't go after the taliban or alkida.

It's not about fighting terrorism. Never has been.
 
With the recent decision of current attorney General ,Eric Holder to move the Sept 11 Terrorist to a New York City Federal civilian court, on U.S. soil, thus making New York City a Terrorists target again, I must suggest a U.S. Army temporary takeover of the United States government from the Obama administration. The U.S. Army could install a leadership tribunal of three Generals to run the country, and they could also appoint other
U.S. Army personell to run the other areas of the American government.

I feel the Obama Administration, and U.S. attorney Eric Holder, are jeopardizing
American safety and , and national security with their decision to bring Terrorists War combattants to American soil for prosecution, and their incorrect decision to close Guantanamo Bay Millitary dentention center in Cuba.

We need the U.S. Army to take over the America governement now. They must by means
of some emergency edict take control away from President Obama Now. The President
is endangering the lives of Americans, and people of the free world with his decisions, and the decisions of his Attorney general Eric Holder. They must both be removed from the America government, and detained by the U.S. Army.

We need an American milltary take over now before it is to late.
The Terrorists will target America again.

Citizens like you are a bigger threat to this country than any foreigners will ever be.

Citizens like us have never ever heard an alleged gov call us thugs and gangs and nazi's. have you???? so we see them as a bigger threat than any terrorists. and they are.

If you support the seizure of the government of the United States of America in contravention to our Constitution, you are a thug. And any in the military that would consider such a seizure are breaking the oath that they took upon enlisting in the service. What you suggest is rankest treason, and should be treated as such.
 
Well I am not the one trying to bring Homosexual marriage to America, its white men like you that are, so your asshole comment should be directed to your self.

I am protected by my free speech rights. I made no threats of violence so you can do your
bitch snitch act to the FBI, I really don't care.

I said a non shooting military take over.

Not only are you a traitorist bastard, you're an ignorant fool too. There are limits to free speech, anyone who completed a HS class in civics understands this; and only a moron believes an Army takeoever of our civilain govenment would not be violent. Maybe you could pled insanity, the DC sniper did and look what it got him.

Its liberal whimps like you, that want to take us back to the pre 9/11 mindset that made
America vulnerable in the first place.

You stupid ass, Bush was repeatedly warned that the greatest threat his administration faced was terrorism. The Clinton administration made it clear that they considered the US in danger from Bin Laden. The Bush administration's reply was to state that they thought that "Clinton has a fixation concerning Bin Laden". On 9-11, they finally understood why Clinton had a fixation about Bin Laden.

But by then, 3000 American's paid with their lives for the lack of concern on the part of the Bush administration. It was not liberals that ignored all the warnings, but Conservatives.
 
The west was settled for the most part without a large military or police presence. Many people owned and carried guns. You tried to rob the local bank and there was quite the reception at the front door.

Rinata - points for being Italian. Unfortunately I read this just before dinner time. Now I'm hungry. Going out for some cheese and then back home to make a pizza.

My people were among the earliest out here. Contrary to what you have stated, by the per centage of population, the military presence was quite large at that time.

Forts and Towns Along the Trails--Last updated 01/21/02
 
yeah! that's right dipshit, we were never attacked, what the hell are you smoking? oh and that black dude did not hit the white woman either? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

learn to read idiot, neither afghanistan or iraq attacked us, unlike us bombing iraq for an entire decade before deciding to not declare war (b/c the republican are too pussy to vote for shit they start) and send in thousands of troops in 03

We went where the terrorists were blu. At least as far as Afghanistan is concerned. I have always thought of Iraq as taking our eye off the ball. Foreign policy is weird. We go into a contry because we think they are developing nuclear weapons. Then you have Bin Laden in Pakistan with known nukes and leave them alone. Hello???

LOL. You noticed that, did you?
 
learn to read idiot, neither afghanistan or iraq attacked us, unlike us bombing iraq for an entire decade before deciding to not declare war (b/c the republican are too pussy to vote for shit they start) and send in thousands of troops in 03

We went where the terrorists were blu. At least as far as Afghanistan is concerned. I have always thought of Iraq as taking our eye off the ball. Foreign policy is weird. We go into a contry because we think they are developing nuclear weapons. Then you have Bin Laden in Pakistan with known nukes and leave them alone. Hello???


Back in August 02' a CIA Bureau Chief went to DC to personally brief the Admin to point out Iraq didn't have wmd and was not pursuing nukes. Cheney even admitted in 06' he would have invaded iraq even if he knew wmd were not there....but he also said the same thing in Sept 2000......yet when that was pointed out to war supporters they wholly ignored it.

The majority of the hijackers came from saudi. Said arabia is also the world's largest financier of terrorism.....yet they are our ally. You can also read accounts of soldiers who pointed out while in afghanistan they didn't go after the taliban or alkida.

It's not about fighting terrorism. Never has been.

the terrorists are trained/funded/supplied/protected in pakistan & saudi arabi. instead of fighting these countries we send them billions, the protection of our amry, and our ex-pres shakes their hands and walks down lanes with them
 
Not only are you a traitorist bastard, you're an ignorant fool too. There are limits to free speech, anyone who completed a HS class in civics understands this; and only a moron believes an Army takeoever of our civilain govenment would not be violent. Maybe you could pled insanity, the DC sniper did and look what it got him.

Its liberal whimps like you, that want to take us back to the pre 9/11 mindset that made
America vulnerable in the first place.

You stupid ass, Bush was repeatedly warned that the greatest threat his administration faced was terrorism. The Clinton administration made it clear that they considered the US in danger from Bin Laden. The Bush administration's reply was to state that they thought that "Clinton has a fixation concerning Bin Laden". On 9-11, they finally understood why Clinton had a fixation about Bin Laden.

But by then, 3000 American's paid with their lives for the lack of concern on the part of the Bush administration. It was not liberals that ignored all the warnings, but Conservatives.

and why didn't clinton kill bin laden when he had many chance to you stupid fuck
 

Forum List

Back
Top