TV news coverage of Trump 93% negative.

It’s like the playground bully complaining that he is the only one who gets disciplined


No, it is not. The media lies, and it influences events and elections.


You know this. YOu just pretend to not, because it serves your agenda.
 
Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
More fake news!

It’s gotta be closer to 98%.
 
America is turning it off.. staying with fox and Breitbart! Breitbart was the most visited site on Facebook last year.
 
impeachairtime.jpg
 
Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
trump is just misunderstood.
 
Most of Trumps bad press is self inflicted

If Trump were to act more as a responsible human being he would not be criticized so much. But his rants, insults, threats, petty taunts leave him open for criticism
 
It is not the biased US Press that is picking on Trump.
The Free Press around the world criticizes his behavior
 
Most of Trumps bad press is self inflicted

If Trump were to act more as a responsible human being he would not be criticized so much. But his rants, insults, threats, petty taunts leave him open for criticism



If that was true, the media would not have to lie, and you would not have to defend their lies.
 
Most of Trumps bad press is self inflicted

If Trump were to act more as a responsible human being he would not be criticized so much. But his rants, insults, threats, petty taunts leave him open for criticism
No data.
 
It is not the biased US Press that is picking on Trump.
The Free Press around the world criticizes his behavior



No man is an island. The political and cultural trends that make his opposition here, so hysterical, are fond in other nations too.


Pointing out that lefties in Europe or wherever are just as upset with him as lefties here, is not evidence that the lies the media tells, are not lies.


You know damn well they are lies.
 
Most of Trumps bad press is self inflicted

If Trump were to act more as a responsible human being he would not be criticized so much. But his rants, insults, threats, petty taunts leave him open for criticism

Love your sig. Not many people would openly admit that anyone he agrees with is wrong.

:banana::banana::banana:
 
See, even the Rabid Right recognizes that Faux News and the Alt Right News platform (formerly known as the Echo-Chamber) is nothing more that a corrupt platform for the GOP to use to try and subvert the Constitution and install a One Party Ruling class in America.

Vote out the corrupt enemies of the Republic.. Vote out the Trumpublicans.
 
Most of Trumps bad press is self inflicted

If Trump were to act more as a responsible human being he would not be criticized so much. But his rants, insults, threats, petty taunts leave him open for criticism



If that was true, the media would not have to lie, and you would not have to defend their lies.

You make another good point

It is Trumps incessant lying that makes him a target of criticism
 

Forum List

Back
Top