Breaking News Trump surges to 53% approval. Democrats scramble for a new take scandal.

Discussion in 'USMB Breaking News' started by MAGAman, Apr 9, 2019.

  1. keepitreal
    Offline

    keepitreal Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2016
    Messages:
    3,261
    Thanks Received:
    1,078
    Trophy Points:
    1,060
    Location:
    Chiraq
    Ratings:
    +2,983
    I firmly believe the polls were manipulated to deter Trump voters
    from coming out and voting...
    why bother, he's going to lose
    what's the point, he doesn't stand a chance
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. skye
    Offline

    skye Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    30,743
    Thanks Received:
    13,453
    Trophy Points:
    1,620
    Ratings:
    +42,308
    I think the approval is higher than 53%........but I can take that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:2up:

    Awesome :clap:
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  3. McRocket
    Online

    McRocket Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,182
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +4,003
    And now they are down to 49% in the ridiculously biased, Rasmussen polls.

    RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

    And Rasmussen were MILES away from being the most accurate pollsters for the 2016 election...you Trumpbots are SO clueless.

    So, are you right wingers ready to admit that ...

    Suck it up.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. Jitss617
    Online

    Jitss617 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2019
    Messages:
    3,156
    Thanks Received:
    238
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Ratings:
    +1,923
    If you eliminated left wing pollsters 90%
     
  5. McRocket
    Online

    McRocket Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,182
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +4,003
    I would ask you to prove it with a link...but you are fast becoming famous for making claims you cannot backup

    ...so I won't bother.
     
  6. Jitss617
    Online

    Jitss617 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2019
    Messages:
    3,156
    Thanks Received:
    238
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Ratings:
    +1,923
    It’s reality, trump is amazing
     
  7. MAGAman
    Offline

    MAGAman VIP Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2019
    Messages:
    1,001
    Thanks Received:
    151
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Ratings:
    +1,048
    sux to be you, hate-boy.

    Rasmussen was the most accurate in 2016.

    Why else do you think the Democrat sheep are all bleating about Rasmussen in unison?
     
  8. Slyhunter
    Offline

    Slyhunter Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2014
    Messages:
    9,378
    Thanks Received:
    1,162
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +5,367
    polls only count idiots who answers their phones to strangers.
     
  9. McRocket
    Online

    McRocket Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,182
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +4,003
    What hate? I have never voted for a Dem or a Rep...I don't much care who wins because whomever does will suck. I just want Trump out because he is obviously stupid and senile (amongst other things).


    And you are clueless about Rasmussen. They were not even REMOTELY close to being the best on the 2016 election.

    Rasmussen said Clinton would get 45%, Trump 43%.

    The actual result was Clinton 48.2% and Trump 46.1%.

    First, please save that old, 'they got the percentage difference almost right'. So what? By that standard, if another poll had predicted Clinton would get 12.2% and Trump 10.1% - that would mean they were more accurate then Rasmussen (by your standards) because they got the percentage difference bang on. Which is - obviously - utter nonsense.
    Total percentage differential is obviously what determines who was closest.

    And Rasmussen was over 3% wrong on Clinton and over 3% wrong on Trump. That leaves a total of over 6% off.

    Fox News said 48% and 44%. So they were dead on with Clinton and only off by two on Trump. So they were way closer then pathetic, biased Rasmussen.
    Economist/YouGov said 49% and 45% (Clinton/Trump, respectively). They also were only off by 2%...far closer then Rasmussen.
    ABC/Washington Post said 49%/45%. Hell they almost got it dead on...off by less than 2% total. MILES better then Rasmussen did.

    White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports®
    RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton



    ABC/Washington Post was off by less then 2%. Rasmussen was off by over 6%.

    Now which is closer? a) Off by under 2% or b) off by over 6%?
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2019 at 4:06 AM
  10. joeblack81
    Offline

    joeblack81 Rookie

    Joined:
    Monday
    Messages:
    9
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1
    the president is using inconsistent words
     

Share This Page