Trump supporters: when it comes to “fake” news about Trump, is it ANY negative story about Trump?

[Billy000]

You cons on the other hand think only in black and white. Trump good, democrats bad! Derp!

Lol. Billy. The way you bash Republicans on this board is infamous. And you accuse us of thinking only in black and white? Have you seen the threads you post?

Lol well you see, TK, that’s what you call having a nuanced opinion

Uh... no.

We call that a pure, unmistakably biased opinion.

I thought all of the 2016 republican candidates were superior to Trump. I had a lot of respect for Jon Kasich. I think Pence brings a lot of dignity and professionalism to his position as VP despite me disagreeing with 100% politically. It would bring me an undeniable peace of mind if he took over as president. The idea of GW Bush starting a 3rd term would thrill me simply because I know Trump is cast aside.

That’s what objectivity looks like. You would never show the left the same intellectual consideration.

 

[BULLDOG]

Since what, about 90% of the "news" on Trump has been negative or portrayed negatively, no doubt some of it was accurate.

It really is a shame that the "news" industry has dropped all pretense regarding their opinion of this guy.

But to be fair, he asked for it. He's committed the biggest sin in their eyes, attacking their "integrity" (har har).
.

Nixon had at least 90% negative reporting during Watergate too. If Trump-0 doesn't like negative reporting, he should quit doing stupid stuff.

The flip side of that is, if the press doesn't like Trump attacking them, they should stop doing stuff that makes him attack them.

That's funny.

 

[BULLDOG]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

He is not a politician and he does not have the indoctrinated scripted speech.

And therein lies his problem. He thinks he can run the country like he ran his bankrupt companies, off the cuff and based on his instincts. A brilliant President could get away with that; Trump is far from brilliant and suffers from a tremendous lack of appreciation for his mental shortcomings.. Bigly.

He seems to be doing a pretty good job of it though. Even you would have to admit that.

Are you kidding?

Are you stupid?

Of course not. If I was stupid, I would think Trump was doing a good job.

 

[hadit]

Since what, about 90% of the "news" on Trump has been negative or portrayed negatively, no doubt some of it was accurate.

It really is a shame that the "news" industry has dropped all pretense regarding their opinion of this guy.

But to be fair, he asked for it. He's committed the biggest sin in their eyes, attacking their "integrity" (har har).
.

Nixon had at least 90% negative reporting during Watergate too. If Trump-0 doesn't like negative reporting, he should quit doing stupid stuff.

The flip side of that is, if the press doesn't like Trump attacking them, they should stop doing stuff that makes him attack them.

That's funny.

Exactly. Trump is responsible for what he does and the press is responsible for what they do.

 

[Correll]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

What's the worst negative coverage of HIllary that you admit to?

There’s plenty of negative coverage of Hillary I admit to. How about you just answer my question?

Because I don't think you are seriously asking a question.


Your dodge supports that conclusion.


What's the worst coverage of HIllary that you will admit to?

Lol you’re so transparent. You know you can answer it but won’t. Once you do, I’ll tell you what I think of Hillary.

No, I think it would be more appropriate if you went first.


page 6 and not one lib has been able to seriously answer the question, you asked of us.

 

[Toro]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

One must always defend the messiah, no matter how retarded he may be!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

When's the last time you heard a negative story about Trump that the RWnuts around here acknowledged was true?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

Did you hear Hannity confirm the story about Trump ordering the firing of Mueller? The story Trump called fake news?

Best laugh of the day!!

What's the worst coverage of Hillary you will admit to?

Foxnews's coverage of the Benghazi non-scandal,

lol

 

[Uncensored2008]

He is not a politician and he does not have the indoctrinated scripted speech.

And therein lies his problem. He thinks he can run the country like he ran his bankrupt companies, off the cuff and based on his instincts. A brilliant President could get away with that; Trump is far from brilliant and suffers from a tremendous lack of appreciation for his mental shortcomings.. Bigly.

He seems to be doing a pretty good job of it though. Even you would have to admit that.

Are you kidding?

Are you stupid?

Of course not. If I was stupid, I would think Trump was doing a good job.

Yeah, best economy in 40 years, lowest UE in 50, highest stock market ever, Obama's ISIS utterly defeated.... What a failure...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Since what, about 90% of the "news" on Trump has been negative or portrayed negatively, no doubt some of it was accurate.

It really is a shame that the "news" industry has dropped all pretense regarding their opinion of this guy.

But to be fair, he asked for it. He's committed the biggest sin in their eyes, attacking their "integrity" (har har).
.

Nixon had at least 90% negative reporting during Watergate too. If Trump-0 doesn't like negative reporting, he should quit doing stupid stuff.

The flip side of that is, if the press doesn't like Trump attacking them, they should stop doing stuff that makes him attack them.

That's funny.

Exactly. Trump is responsible for what he does and the press is responsible for what they do.

What Trump does is build a booming economy, secure our defense, and restore liberty.

What the leftstream press does is lie.

 

[peach174]

Yeah, Black unemployment falling.
What a failure.

 

[Uncensored2008]

One must always defend the messiah, no matter how retarded he may be!

But enough about Obama....

 

[Mac1958]

Yeah, Black unemployment falling.
What a failure.

Funny how the media keeps missing that.
.

 

[dannyboys]

They admit he lied, but find it endearing. It's like they think he is only lying to liberals, and they like that.

Trump was only telling the liberals that Mexico would pay for the wall.

President Trump said mexico will pay for the wall. He meant it and it will happen. All he needs to do is put a 1% duty on every dollar illegal mexicans send back to mexico.
That will pay for the wall and have some leftover to pay for the amount the illegals are sucking off the US taxpayer for every conceivable 'benefit' they can think of.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

When's the last time you heard a negative story about Trump that the RWnuts around here acknowledged was true?

When was the last time the little Goebbels of the leftstream media published something that actually was true?

New York Times guidelines for publishing stories:

1. Does it attack Trump?
2. Does it attack Republicans?
3. Does it further the cause of Socialism?
4. Does it help put democrats in office?
5. Is it anti-Christian?
6. Is it Pro-Muslim?
7. Does it denounce the United States or the Constitution?
8. Does it call white people racist?
9. Does it promote illegal aliens?

What is not, what is NEVER asked is "is it true?" Because that simply doesn't matter to the leftist press.

 

[dannyboys]

Ok I was kidding. He's doing a wonderful job.

Whether you like it or not.

Trump has accomplished in a year, less than 1/10th what he promised to do in his first 100 days.

BONOBO made a lot of promises. How long did it take for BONOBO to "close down gitmo on my first day in office".
How about all those "shovel ready jobs" BONOBO promised?

 

[Correll]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

Did you hear Hannity confirm the story about Trump ordering the firing of Mueller? The story Trump called fake news?

Best laugh of the day!!

What's the worst coverage of Hillary you will admit to?

Foxnews's coverage of the Benghazi non-scandal,

lol

Page nine and counting and no lib can admit to any negative coverage of Hillary.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

When's the last time you heard a negative story about Trump that the RWnuts around here acknowledged was true?

That trump is a lefty? Yes we acknowledge it as true .

 

[bripat9643]

Is there any negative coverage about Trump you can think of that has validity, or is Trump just perfect for some reason? I can’t think of a time when Trump supporters have ever been objective.

Since the fake media can't produce anything negative about Trump unless they manufacture it, the answer is "yes," all negative news about Trump is fake.

 

[debbiedowner]

You all can bitch and moan about the so called fake news all you want but the fact of the matter is the year before he was elected you saw Trump over and over again on all news channels and they are responsible for electing him. But of course, you would not have seen the other candidates.

I am loyal to no one except my family, I do not worship any President, never have and never will. I would have voted for Kasich if had any chance of winning the nomination but I never worshipped him.

As for Trump I am beginning to see his democratic side come out, he can be a registered this or that but he's slowly going a little left if it wasn't for the likes of Miller and Kelley he'd be a moderate democrat.