Trump: "...[Democrats] They could kill the baby at anytime they wanted to"

[Rumpole]

Dems talk out of both sides of their mouth

The party will absolutely support abortion on demand at any stage although a tiny minority may have reservations

Show me the legislation, and I'll show you that you are talking shit.

 

[Mac-7]

Show me the legislation, and I'll show you that you are talking shit.

There are many examples from obama to the previous gov of VA

But this is the most recent

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/11/politics/house-abortion-bill/index.html

 

[San Souci]

Your problem is obvious

The New Democrat Country song. " Mama , don't let your babies grow up to be babies".

 

[San Souci]

Show me the legislation, and I'll show you that you are talking shit.

There never was any legislation making baby murder legal. It was a bogus SCOTUS decision. Recently overturned by Dobbs,

 

[themirrorthief]

When you're brought up to believe lies through religion, once you've got someone believing, they're YOURS. And Trump knows it.

i never had sex with that woman....Ms Lewinski....democrats never lie

 

[themirrorthief]

Fuck you.

with your tiny dic.....you wish peanut

 

[CrusaderFrank]

and during the Townhall on CNN Trump went on to lie about Dems....

"[Democrats would] Rip the baby out of the womb at the end of the ninth month,
they will kill the baby in the ninth month".


And the gullible folks in the audience lapped it up. So do many of you.

And many on this forum can't seem to fathom why it is that Democrats loathe Trump. They have the gall to call us 'haters', as if we have no good reason to hold Trump in utter contempt, not to mention he's under criminal investigation, he is now liable in a sex predation defamation case, is about to be indicted on other criminal charges, and some 8 of his associates have been indicted and/or convicted, i.e., this man oozes of crime and slime.

You see, no President in history, nor any gentleman, statesman, someone worthy of the high station he seeks, would ever, has ever accused their opponents in this egregious, despicable, dehumanizing fashion.

But, of course, Republicans don't give a damn. "Biden is divisive" they say, while they completely ignore the utter divisiveness of Donald Trump.

But, Trump's fans love it when Trump gaslights the left, and you guys join in and you on the right think it's all a big joke.

And the right's response? More gaslighting; 'TDS' they say. Totally oblivious to what is going on.

You can't possibly see that this criminal sex offender is not good for the country, to have such a despicable human being like Trump as president.

No, you can't, and this post will fall on blind eyes.

TRump kicked over a log in America, and all the gullible lost souls under it crawled out, and in Trump, they found their champion.

What you don't know is that Trump knows he's lying, and doesn't care, he just wants power and revenge.

That's it, he doesn't give a damn about you, this is absolutely certain. You are just a pawn for his bloviated ego.

Basket of deplorables

MAGA Extremists

Oh, GFY

 

[Father O'Blivion]

Right up to the moment of birth. Abortion on demand. And don't think they won't do it. With the price they get for late term baby parts, it makes their mouth water. And no anesthesia. Just slit it's neck and wait for it to die.

Then they'll kick puppies and kittens with glee!

 

[BlindBoo]

But this is the most recent

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/11/politics/house-abortion-bill/index.html

Congress passed the Infants born alive act by unanimous consent in both chambers over two decades ago. So whenever any of the common Neo-GOP liars say the Democrats support infanticide, They're lying their asses off.


SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as
including born-alive infant

``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.

Text - H.R.2175 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002

Text for H.R.2175 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002

www.congress.gov

 

[Mac-7]

Congress passed the Infants born alive act by unanimous consent in both chambers over two decades ago. So whenever any of the common Neo-GOP liars say the Democrats support infanticide, They're lying their asses off.


SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as
including born-alive infant

``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.

Text - H.R.2175 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002

Text for H.R.2175 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002

www.congress.gov

The act prohibits lib doctors from murdering the child after birth

So far so good

But the liberal work-around for that law is just to do nothing after birth and allow the child to die from neglect

 

[BlindBoo]

The act prohibits lib doctors from murdering the child after birth

So far so good

But the liberal work-around for that law is just to do nothing after birth and allow the child to die from neglect

You just can't help yourself can you? A neglectful situation that caught national attention was the reason Congress passed that Federal Law outlawing the practice of letting them die from neglect throughout the entire nation because some states didn't have protection against such practices. It has been a felony to not give ordinary care to every infant born alive regard if is was a botched abortion or not. Here are some examples of ordinary verses extraordinary care.

Ordinary vs Extraordinary Care | ALL

The American Life League is the oldest grassroots pro-life education organization in the US, and has been defending the sacredness of life since 1979.

all.org

1. An infant is born with Down’s syndrome, indicating probable mental retardation. He needs very low-risk surgery for an easily correctable intestinal defect. If untreated the baby will not be able to retain food and will die. The parents refuse surgery, stating that the mental retardation will mean a less than meaningful life for the baby.
   Answer: This case involves ordinary care; illegal decision: Parents may not refuse ordinary care; the refusal of surgery would result in the proximate cause of death for the child they have a legal duty to protect. Courts, however, usually have ruled in favor of parents’ refusal.
2. A seven-year-old girl, auto-accident victim with severe internal bleeding, needs an immediate blood transfusion to prevent death. Her parents refuse consent because blood transfusions are forbidden by their religion (Jehovah’s Witnesses).
   Answer: This case involves ordinary care; illegal decision: Parents may not invoke their right to free exercise of religion to refuse lifesaving care for their child, for that would be a violation of the child’s unalienable right to life, which takes precedence over all other fundamental rights.
3. A baby is born with anencephaly (part or most of the brain matter absent), with a prognosis of living only a few weeks or months. A decision is made to withhold all nourishment by mouth or other means.
   Answer: Ordinary care; illegal decision: Ordinary care is mandatory for all patients regardless of prognosis. However, in practice, many children like this are starved.

 

[Seymour Flops]

and during the Townhall on CNN Trump went on to lie about Dems....

"[Democrats would] Rip the baby out of the womb at the end of the ninth month,
they will kill the baby in the ninth month".


And the gullible folks in the audience lapped it up. So do many of you.

And many on this forum can't seem to fathom why it is that Democrats loathe Trump. They have the gall to call us 'haters', as if we have no good reason to hold Trump in utter contempt, not to mention he's under criminal investigation, he is now liable in a sex predation defamation case, is about to be indicted on other criminal charges, and some 8 of his associates have been indicted and/or convicted, i.e., this man oozes of crime and slime.

You see, no President in history, nor any gentleman, statesman, someone worthy of the high station he seeks, would ever, has ever accused their opponents in this egregious, despicable, dehumanizing fashion.

But, of course, Republicans don't give a damn. "Biden is divisive" they say, while they completely ignore the utter divisiveness of Donald Trump.

But, Trump's fans love it when Trump gaslights the left, and you guys join in and you on the right think it's all a big joke.

And the right's response? More gaslighting; 'TDS' they say. Totally oblivious to what is going on.

You can't possibly see that this criminal sex offender is not good for the country, to have such a despicable human being like Trump as president.

No, you can't, and this post will fall on blind eyes.

TRump kicked over a log in America, and all the gullible lost souls under it crawled out, and in Trump, they found their champion.

What you don't know is that Trump knows he's lying, and doesn't care, he just wants power and revenge.

That's it, he doesn't give a damn about you, this is absolutely certain. You are just a pawn for his bloviated ego.

What I never see or hear from Democrats is this:

"Of course I don't believe in abortion in the 9th month! That would be killing a fully formed baby, and I would never support that!"

If you can say that, you'd be the first Dem to so so.

 

[Mac-7]

You just can't help yourself can you? A neglectful situation that caught national attention was the reason Congress passed that Federal Law outlawing the practice of letting them die from neglect throughout the entire nation because some states didn't have protection against such practices. It has been a felony to not give ordinary care to every infant born alive regard if is was a botched abortion or not. Here are some examples of ordinary verses extraordinary care.

Ordinary vs Extraordinary Care | ALL

The American Life League is the oldest grassroots pro-life education organization in the US, and has been defending the sacredness of life since 1979.

all.org

1. An infant is born with Down’s syndrome, indicating probable mental retardation. He needs very low-risk surgery for an easily correctable intestinal defect. If untreated the baby will not be able to retain food and will die. The parents refuse surgery, stating that the mental retardation will mean a less than meaningful life for the baby.
   Answer: This case involves ordinary care; illegal decision: Parents may not refuse ordinary care; the refusal of surgery would result in the proximate cause of death for the child they have a legal duty to protect. Courts, however, usually have ruled in favor of parents’ refusal.
2. A seven-year-old girl, auto-accident victim with severe internal bleeding, needs an immediate blood transfusion to prevent death. Her parents refuse consent because blood transfusions are forbidden by their religion (Jehovah’s Witnesses).
   Answer: This case involves ordinary care; illegal decision: Parents may not invoke their right to free exercise of religion to refuse lifesaving care for their child, for that would be a violation of the child’s unalienable right to life, which takes precedence over all other fundamental rights.
3. A baby is born with anencephaly (part or most of the brain matter absent), with a prognosis of living only a few weeks or months. A decision is made to withhold all nourishment by mouth or other means.
   Answer: Ordinary care; illegal decision: Ordinary care is mandatory for all patients regardless of prognosis. However, in practice, many children like this are starved.

The child will die in minutes or a few hours if left alone

The public is not supposed to ever know

And if the abortionists can help it no one outside the hospital room ever will know

 

[BlindBoo]

The child will die in minutes or a few hours if left alone

The public is not supposed to ever know

And if the abortionists can help it no one outside the hospital room ever will know

Yes, criminals break laws. Had the new bill become law, the same criminals who skirted tha law would also find a way to skirt the new one.

 

[Mac-7]

Yes, criminals break laws. Had the new bill become law, the same criminals who skirted tha law would also find a way to skirt the new one.

Some would get away with it

But others wont

 

[BlindBoo]

What I never see or hear from Democrats is this:

"Of course I don't believe in abortion in the 9th month! That would be killing a fully formed baby, and I would never support that!"

If you can say that, you'd be the first Dem to so so.

The only reason for late term abortions to be legal is the rare cases where fetal anomalies are not caught early and the fetus is either dead or dying. No reasonable person carries a fetus for 8 months only to decide to abort it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The only reason for late term abortions to be legal is the rare cases where fetal anomalies are not caught early and the fetus is either dead or dying. No reasonable person carries a fetus for 8 months only to decide to abort it.

Suppose a woman in her 9th month gets laid off from her job and decides that a baby will hinder her job search. Should it be legal for her to have an abortion?

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

The only reason for late term abortions to be legal is the rare cases where fetal anomalies are not caught early and the fetus is either dead or dying. No reasonable person carries a fetus for 8 months only to decide to abort it.

No reasonable person kills their own kid no matter what their age.

No reasonable person could ever support the legality of such monstrosity.

 

[BlindBoo]

No reasonable person kills their own kid no matter what their age.

No reasonable person could ever support the legality of such monstrosity.

A 12 week old fetus is not a kid, a child or an infant.

As of 2015 in the United States, more than 90% of abortions occur before the 13th week, 1.3% of abortions in the United States took place after the 21st week,[4] and less than 1% occur after 24 weeks.

You've conflated reasonableness and zealotry.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

A 12 week old fetus is not a kid, a child or an infant.

He or she is a young human being.

Your semantics will change nothing. The only sense they are not literally a kid is the most literal and primary definition - young humans are not young goats. They are still young humans.