trump collusion timeline

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
 
“Collusion against Trump” timeline | Sharyl Attkisson

sharyl attkisson broke fast n furious. obama wasnt happy.

now we will get to hear the left trash her as fake but no one will be able to refute her facts. its mostly just a timeline of events which peoplecwill interpret in their own way anyway.
Haven’t seen a desperate Hail Mary like that in a long time, thanks for the laugh.
like i said, mock her but fail to refute the facts.

so predictible.
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.
.
Regardless of the truths you list, his mindless minions believe every lie he tells.

However, had Obama tried the same sh!t, what would the conservatives' reactions have been?

.
32677440_2084463778313332_3080729038684160000_n.png


.
 
“Collusion against Trump” timeline | Sharyl Attkisson

sharyl attkisson broke fast n furious. obama wasnt happy.

now we will get to hear the left trash her as fake but no one will be able to refute her facts. its mostly just a timeline of events which peoplecwill interpret in their own way anyway.

That was great...Thanks..

It's too bad fake news liberals can't read or comprehend, they could save themselves a lot of embarrassment... :lol:

.
 
Last edited:
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.
like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.
 
Nutbags have twisted themselves into a pretzel again.

In the nutbag brain, these two things are true at the same time:

1) Dems didn’t take Trump seriously as a candidate.

2) Dems feared Trump so much that they planted spies in his campaign in order to beat him.
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.
like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.
like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.
and of course you're going to give obama allowances for this because you like him.

again, thank you for proving my point.

how - let's take all the shit obama did in office and lets now let trump do it.

FISA can now issue warrants under false pretenses to trump. hey - the left made this action ok. you're fucked in the head if you think only one side will do this. the fact is when one side pushes it and gets away with it, it's simply a "hold my beer" moment for the other side.

aka - the nuclear option and not being allowed to appoint a SCOTUS when you're a lame duck president. all things the dems came up with when it suited their purpose but when obama was a lame duck president - hey, that's different. he should be able to appoint someone now.

i don't care about the names and people. put #'s on them instead and remove party lines - are these actions still ok for both sides to take? if you allow one but not the other, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM these days.

so we can either stop the crap now and reel ourselves in, or we may as well take a torch to the constitution cause no one will ever actually follow it again and put an end to this country.

it has nothing to do with trump, obama, the clintons and the like but all about us. you, me and the rest of the people in this country's inability to resolve differences without hate and lies.

the media and gov is a reflection of us so we have ourselves to blame due to some jacked up need to be emotionally correct about what is going on in the world today.
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.
.
Regardless of the truths you list, his mindless minions believe every lie he tells.

However, had Obama tried the same sh!t, what would the conservatives' reactions have been?

.View attachment 195132

.
occupy democrats.

bwahahahahahahahahaha. may as well put your cheerleader skirt on and wave your pom poms loud and proud because no one from any form of an unbiased perspective would EVER quote occupy democrats to prove any point other than their own gullibility.
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?
well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?
well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.
It could just be a coincidence, which is why I said potential..but coincidence like that takes some planning. Don't you think that warrants looking into?
 
Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?
then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.
like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.
and of course you're going to give obama allowances for this because you like him.

again, thank you for proving my point.

how - let's take all the shit obama did in office and lets now let trump do it.

FISA can now issue warrants under false pretenses to trump. hey - the left made this action ok. you're fucked in the head if you think only one side will do this. the fact is when one side pushes it and gets away with it, it's simply a "hold my beer" moment for the other side.

What false pretense? The FISA warrant was for Carter Page, not Trump.

aka - the nuclear option and not being allowed to appoint a SCOTUS when you're a lame duck president. all things the dems came up with when it suited their purpose but when obama was a lame duck president - hey, that's different. he should be able to appoint someone now.

Um, is there something wrong with the wiring in your head? Republicans blocked Obama from making a SCOTUS appointment not the other way around. Republicans DID that. They have now set the precedent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top