trump collusion timeline

[iceberg]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

It could just be a coincidence, which is why I said potential..but coincidence like that takes some planning. Don't you think that warrants looking into?

yep. i do.

but i believe things like tarmac meetings, spying complaints, planting informants into opposite campaigns, and making up reasons to spy on people all should be looked into also.

agreed?

 

[Crepitus]

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

It could just be a coincidence, which is why I said potential..but coincidence like that takes some planning. Don't you think that warrants looking into?

yep. i do.

but i believe things like tarmac meetings, spying complaints, planting informants into opposite campaigns, and making up reasons to spy on people all should be looked into also.

agreed?

They have been, and every one of the has been determindd to be nothing more than trumpian propaganda.

 

[iceberg]

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.

and of course you're going to give obama allowances for this because you like him.

again, thank you for proving my point.

how - let's take all the shit obama did in office and lets now let trump do it.

FISA can now issue warrants under false pretenses to trump. hey - the left made this action ok. you're fucked in the head if you think only one side will do this. the fact is when one side pushes it and gets away with it, it's simply a "hold my beer" moment for the other side.

What false pretense? The FISA warrant was for Carter Page, not Trump.

aka - the nuclear option and not being allowed to appoint a SCOTUS when you're a lame duck president. all things the dems came up with when it suited their purpose but when obama was a lame duck president - hey, that's different. he should be able to appoint someone now.

Um, is there something wrong with the wiring in your head? Republicans blocked Obama from making a SCOTUS appointment not the other way around. Republicans DID that. They have now set the precedent.

yea, and what did biden say when it was a republican lame duck and he didn't want them to make the selection?

Joe Biden’s 1992 opposition to lame-duck Supreme Court pick could doom Obama nomination

way back in 1992. the DEMOCRATS did that and the republicans simply followed the lead. so yea, democrats love to set rules up that work in their favor then go "oh no that doesn't apply" when it doesn't, only it doesn't work that way.

this is why i think if we don't stop the bullshit illegal activities on a baseline, the next side will just one up it and we're toast because we care more about hating the other side than admitting we've all got issues we need to sort out.

 

[iceberg]

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

It could just be a coincidence, which is why I said potential..but coincidence like that takes some planning. Don't you think that warrants looking into?

yep. i do.

but i believe things like tarmac meetings, spying complaints, planting informants into opposite campaigns, and making up reasons to spy on people all should be looked into also.

agreed?

They have been, and every one of the has been determindd to be nothing more than trumpian propaganda.

any fucktard that just replies to mock trump and the people who voted for him is pompombullshit.

wave 'em high mang, wave 'em high.

 

[Crepitus]

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

It could just be a coincidence, which is why I said potential..but coincidence like that takes some planning. Don't you think that warrants looking into?

yep. i do.

but i believe things like tarmac meetings, spying complaints, planting informants into opposite campaigns, and making up reasons to spy on people all should be looked into also.

agreed?

They have been, and every one of the has been determindd to be nothing more than trumpian propaganda.

any fucktard that just replies to mock trump and the people who voted for him is pompombullshit.

wave 'em high mang, wave 'em high.

Not real big on truth or contrary opinions are you.

 

[Seawytch]

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

It could just be a coincidence, which is why I said potential..but coincidence like that takes some planning. Don't you think that warrants looking into?

yep. i do.

but i believe things like tarmac meetings, spying complaints, planting informants into opposite campaigns, and making up reasons to spy on people all should be looked into also.

agreed?

There is no spying. You are falling for an Alex Joneseque conspiracy theory being spread by the Obama birth certificate guy. Nobody made up reasons to spy on anyone. An investigation was going on because Russia was interfering in our election. The reason the Trump campaign was involved is because the Trump campaign was involved!

Do you remember everyone in the Trump campaign claiming that there were no contacts with Russians? Do you remember finding out that there were 70 contacts with over a dozen Russians close to Putin?

You can't keep pretending there is no there there.

Go ahead and "look into" Bill Clinton's five minute "hey, howedy" with Lynch. They are not in power. You do realize that Republicans run the government. They can investigate anyone they want to.

 

[bripat9643]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.

Obama is a fucking commie who tried as hard as he could to destroy this country.

 

[Seawytch]

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.

and of course you're going to give obama allowances for this because you like him.

again, thank you for proving my point.

how - let's take all the shit obama did in office and lets now let trump do it.

FISA can now issue warrants under false pretenses to trump. hey - the left made this action ok. you're fucked in the head if you think only one side will do this. the fact is when one side pushes it and gets away with it, it's simply a "hold my beer" moment for the other side.

What false pretense? The FISA warrant was for Carter Page, not Trump.

aka - the nuclear option and not being allowed to appoint a SCOTUS when you're a lame duck president. all things the dems came up with when it suited their purpose but when obama was a lame duck president - hey, that's different. he should be able to appoint someone now.

Um, is there something wrong with the wiring in your head? Republicans blocked Obama from making a SCOTUS appointment not the other way around. Republicans DID that. They have now set the precedent.

yea, and what did biden say when it was a republican lame duck and he didn't want them to make the selection?

Joe Biden’s 1992 opposition to lame-duck Supreme Court pick could doom Obama nomination

way back in 1992. the DEMOCRATS did that and the republicans simply followed the lead. so yea, democrats love to set rules up that work in their favor then go "oh no that doesn't apply" when it doesn't, only it doesn't work that way.

this is why i think if we don't stop the bullshit illegal activities on a baseline, the next side will just one up it and we're toast because we care more about hating the other side than admitting we've all got issues we need to sort out.

They didn't DO it. Republicans have set the precedent not Democrats. They never actually did it.

Fast forward to the next Democratic president and imagine them acting even a fraction of the way Donald Trump acts...are you comfortable with the precedent being set?

"President (Democrat) demands the DOJ show him/her evidence in an investigation into their campaign".

Puhleese!

 

[bripat9643]

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

It could just be a coincidence, which is why I said potential..but coincidence like that takes some planning. Don't you think that warrants looking into?

yep. i do.

but i believe things like tarmac meetings, spying complaints, planting informants into opposite campaigns, and making up reasons to spy on people all should be looked into also.

agreed?

They have been, and every one of the has been determindd to be nothing more than trumpian propaganda.

No they haven't. They haven't begun to look into them yet. You're a fucking douchebag. It's pointless to debate people who lie so shamelessly. You know what "gaslighting" is? If you look it up in the dictionary, you'll see your picture there.

 

[bripat9643]

like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.

and of course you're going to give obama allowances for this because you like him.

again, thank you for proving my point.

how - let's take all the shit obama did in office and lets now let trump do it.

FISA can now issue warrants under false pretenses to trump. hey - the left made this action ok. you're fucked in the head if you think only one side will do this. the fact is when one side pushes it and gets away with it, it's simply a "hold my beer" moment for the other side.

What false pretense? The FISA warrant was for Carter Page, not Trump.

aka - the nuclear option and not being allowed to appoint a SCOTUS when you're a lame duck president. all things the dems came up with when it suited their purpose but when obama was a lame duck president - hey, that's different. he should be able to appoint someone now.

Um, is there something wrong with the wiring in your head? Republicans blocked Obama from making a SCOTUS appointment not the other way around. Republicans DID that. They have now set the precedent.

yea, and what did biden say when it was a republican lame duck and he didn't want them to make the selection?

Joe Biden’s 1992 opposition to lame-duck Supreme Court pick could doom Obama nomination

way back in 1992. the DEMOCRATS did that and the republicans simply followed the lead. so yea, democrats love to set rules up that work in their favor then go "oh no that doesn't apply" when it doesn't, only it doesn't work that way.

this is why i think if we don't stop the bullshit illegal activities on a baseline, the next side will just one up it and we're toast because we care more about hating the other side than admitting we've all got issues we need to sort out.

They didn't DO it. Republicans have set the precedent not Democrats. They never actually did it.

Fast forward to the next Democratic president and imagine them acting even a fraction of the way Donald Trump acts...are you comfortable with the precedent being set?

"President (Democrat) demands the DOJ show him/her evidence in an investigation into their campaign".

Puhleese!

We already had that in spades with the Clinton administration.

 

[iceberg]

like i said to start, even footing n wrong is wrong for ALL SIDES.

when you dont care about worse from one n overcare about lesser crimes from another, its bullshit n personal, not justice.

???

As for the collusion, investigate everyone. Sure.

As for the OOJ...Obama didn't fire the guy who was investigating him (he wasn't investigated)

Obama didn't pay off a porn star, claim he didn't know her, then had to disclose that he did pay her either.

Obama is ten times the person Trump is as a president, a father, and a man.

and of course you're going to give obama allowances for this because you like him.

again, thank you for proving my point.

how - let's take all the shit obama did in office and lets now let trump do it.

FISA can now issue warrants under false pretenses to trump. hey - the left made this action ok. you're fucked in the head if you think only one side will do this. the fact is when one side pushes it and gets away with it, it's simply a "hold my beer" moment for the other side.

What false pretense? The FISA warrant was for Carter Page, not Trump.

aka - the nuclear option and not being allowed to appoint a SCOTUS when you're a lame duck president. all things the dems came up with when it suited their purpose but when obama was a lame duck president - hey, that's different. he should be able to appoint someone now.

Um, is there something wrong with the wiring in your head? Republicans blocked Obama from making a SCOTUS appointment not the other way around. Republicans DID that. They have now set the precedent.

yea, and what did biden say when it was a republican lame duck and he didn't want them to make the selection?

Joe Biden’s 1992 opposition to lame-duck Supreme Court pick could doom Obama nomination

way back in 1992. the DEMOCRATS did that and the republicans simply followed the lead. so yea, democrats love to set rules up that work in their favor then go "oh no that doesn't apply" when it doesn't, only it doesn't work that way.

this is why i think if we don't stop the bullshit illegal activities on a baseline, the next side will just one up it and we're toast because we care more about hating the other side than admitting we've all got issues we need to sort out.

They didn't DO it. Republicans have set the precedent not Democrats. They never actually did it.

Fast forward to the next Democratic president and imagine them acting even a fraction of the way Donald Trump acts...are you comfortable with the precedent being set?

"President (Democrat) demands the DOJ show him/her evidence in an investigation into their campaign".

Puhleese!

don't give a shit. there you go with exactly what the problem is. the DEMOCRATS made this rule, the republicans just used it. now that your bulletpoint is "soiled" you want to change up the timeline and/or reasons for the actions.

I DO NOT GIVE A FUCK cause i don't do that. if one side is ok with something happening then the other side is allowed the same "freedoms" - only these days it's all stupid. it's 'my side can fuck your side over but you can't do that to us" and we get into stupid arguments like this one.

biden came up with this rule. he put it in play. much like the "nuclear option" was a democratic trick that got used against them. as far as i'm concerned we need to spell this out as a YES/NO and period. done. no more political games of advantage on things like this. you're in office, you can make the pick until your last day. getting it approved however, now that seems to be the killer on both sides.

if the next president wants to spend their day on twitter and bash the press, have at it. those actions are not illegal now are they. just highly annoying. the only thing more annoying are the millions of people who have TDS and cry FOUL in unison everywhere they can about it.

if you're worried about trump setting a precedence of twitter use but don't give a shit we're mired in spying on the other campaigns as one also being set - you're kinda fucked in the head dude.

 

[candycorn]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

How much uranium made it to Russia to make the “warheads”?

 

[Crepitus]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

How much uranium made it to Russia to make the “warheads”?

Unranium None.

 

[iceberg]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

How much uranium made it to Russia to make the “warheads”?

dunno. how much of ZTE has fucked up your life?

 

[Crepitus]

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

How much uranium made it to Russia to make the “warheads”?

dunno. how much of ZTE has fucked up your life?

Zte was convicted of providing Iran with sensitive american technology. You know, stuff they might be able to use in things like a ballistic missile or nuclear weapons program? Oh, but you guys aren't concenrned about Iran getting a bomb, are you?

 

[candycorn]

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

How much uranium made it to Russia to make the “warheads”?

dunno. how much of ZTE has fucked up your life?

The profanity is unfortunate.

Zero in both cases. I suspect you knew Russia never got a physical gram of Uranium from the deal. Right?

As for ZTE…propping up a Chinese phone company is in the best interest of the American People why exactly?

 

[mudwhistle]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

Says the retarded Hillary supporter. LOL

 

[Crepitus]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

Says the retarded Hillary supporter. LOL

Bzzzzzt! Wrong. Can't stand Clintons.

 

[candycorn]

Collusion against trump?

First of all "LMf'nAO".

Second, collusion isn't a crime, remember?

then trump isnt guilty of anything.

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

Says the retarded Hillary supporter. LOL

So says the racist piece of shit trump supporter.

Guns Aren't The Threat, Blacks w. or without Guns Are

 

[iceberg]

Well,

First there is the collusion matter
Second there is the obstruction of justice matter
Third there is the campaign finance disclosure matter
Fourth; if he goes under oath with Mueller, I'm going to run out of numbers because the man cannot tell the truth; most of the times he isn't even in the same zip code as anything truthful.

And the potential bribery/pay for play thing...

Opinion | Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?

well at least we now call bullshit "opinions" these days until we have proof. maybe that's a step in the right direction. but hey - the only thing an anti-trumper needs is a lie they can believe in, so stay warm..

kinda funny how selling nuclear warhead material isn't a big issue but keeping a phone company afloat that supplies many other phone companies is a huge ordeal.

it may well be. but i don't think enough of it is known to be sure. but hey, facts up the ass. it's a trump slap so have at it.

How much uranium made it to Russia to make the “warheads”?

dunno. how much of ZTE has fucked up your life?

The profanity is unfortunate.

Zero in both cases. I suspect you knew Russia never got a physical gram of Uranium from the deal. Right?

As for ZTE…propping up a Chinese phone company is in the best interest of the American People why exactly?

yep. i hate it when i do that shit.

as for the russia deal - always seems to come back to the same of russia got nothing but how much did they spend? i don't buy the "nothing" any more than you seem to think there's anything there. now what? we can't even agree on illegal vs. legal activity anymore.

which is quite a fucked up place to be, unfortunate or not.

ZTE may not be in our best interests. there's so much dis-information out there doing nothing but slamming trump it's hard to get a valid read on much of anything anymore.