trary to April reports, U.S. economy CONTRACTED 0.7% in 1Q2015

Little-Acorn

Gold Member
Jun 20, 2006
10,025
2,410
290
San Diego, CA
Contrary to April reports, U.S. economy CONTRACTED 0.7% in Jan-March 2015


As I've said before, initial reports of a "good" economy always get revised downward.... later, after the big headlines have faded.

1q2015 was no exception. They reported in April that the economy had grown weakly, by 0.2%.

Not so. It actually contracted, recession-style, by 0.7%

No surprise to people who have been watching for a while. Economy-predictors always do that, and then quietly let out the truth some time later.

Remember this post, made one month ago today?
US Economy turns in weakest growth to date. Page 2 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

----------------------------------------------------

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/30/business/economy/us-economy-gdp-q1-revision.html?_r=0

U.S. Economy Contracted 0.7% in First Quarter

By NELSON D. SCHWARTZ
MAY 29, 2015

The United States economy got off to an even weaker start this year than first thought, the government reported Friday, as economic activity contracted because of a more dismal trade performance and continued caution by businesses and consumers alike.

The 0.7 percent annual rate of decline in economic output in the first quarter of 2015 was a reversal of the initial 0.2 percent advance for the period reported last month by the Commerce Department.

Although statistical quirks and one-time factors like wintry weather in some parts of the country played a role, as did a work slowdown at West Coast ports, the lackluster report for January, February and March underscores the American economy’s continuing inability to generate much momentum.

The pullback was the third time that economic activity had posted a quarterly contraction since the current recovery began in mid-2009, with declines in output in the first quarters of 2011 and 2014. Even acknowledging flaws in the way the government takes account of expected seasonal variations, that on-again, off-again pattern helps explain why annual growth rates in recent years have been well below the pace of gains recorded in the 1990s and mid-2000s.
 
Obama has created the weakest recovery post WW2 in history. All the yammering about "Dow!" and "5.7% unemployment" and "Bush lost 200,000 jobs a month" (it was in two months, the rest of his presidency unemployment was well below 5%) dont make up for the weakest GDP and household income figures ever.
 
Obama has created the weakest recovery post WW2 in history. All the yammering about "Dow!" and "5.7% unemployment" and "Bush lost 200,000 jobs a month" (it was in two months, the rest of his presidency unemployment was well below 5%) dont make up for the weakest GDP and household income figures ever.
will they still be using the old "but we were losing one million jobs a month when Bush was in office" excuse?
 
The economy is growing at the slowest rate in recorded history. FACT.

Obama has done NOTHING to spur this thing on


Absolutely NOTHING .
 
The economy is growing at the slowest rate in recorded history. FACT.

Obama has done NOTHING to spur this thing on


Absolutely NOTHING .
All government has to do to spur an economic recovery, is get out of the way. And stick to protecting people's basic rights.

And that's what Obama hasn't done.

It's the people who create the recover (and prosperity in general).... as long as government doesn't do anything to restrict or prevent it.
 
mrz053115dAPR20150530054517.jpg
 
Here's t he point where G5000 comes in and tells us how it's all Bush's fault... wait for it... wait for it...
 
Here's t he point where G5000 comes in and tells us how it's all Bush's fault... wait for it... wait for it...
It will continue to be Bush's fault until the day the next Republican president is inaugurated, especially if Hillary somehow manages to win. No matter how long it takes, it will always be Bush's fault.
 

Forum List

Back
Top