Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The liberal strategy -- ignore everything that shows how wrong you are.
It doesn't matter what WMD. The fact is that Hussein had WMD.
There were biological labs found as well as actual WMD.
A Sarin shell even went off.
It doesn't matter what WMD. The fact is that Hussein had WMD.
There were biological labs found as well as actual WMD.
A Sarin shell even went off.
Cost/benefit analysis??? Finding expired biological weapons was worth thousands dead and bankrupting our country?
Not hardly....
But thanks for the rightwingnut insanity of thinking that if you repeat lies often enough people will believe you.
Two people were treated for "minor exposure" after the sarin incident but no serious injuries were reported. Soldiers transporting the shell for inspection suffered symptoms consistent with low-level chemical exposure, which is what led to the discovery, a U.S. official told Fox News.
So you are saying FAUX are liars.There is nothing minor about nerve agents, edthecynic.
Two people were treated for "minor exposure" after the sarin incident but no serious injuries were reported. Soldiers transporting the shell for inspection suffered symptoms consistent with low-level chemical exposure, which is what led to the discovery, a U.S. official told Fox News.
First of all, you have the REAL WORLD exposure of people to the "WMDs" with only MINOR reactions, and secondly you have a 2004 report, from FAUX no less, that says that after tests on the mustard gas in your 2003 UN report the gas was "ineffective."2003 UN Report: Iraq Sulfur Mustard Gas Chemical Weapons Have High Quality After 12 years of Storage
Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:38:34 PM by jveritas
Since the story broke yesterday about finding 500 Shells of Chemical Weapons in Iraq, shells that contain Sulfur Mustard Gas or Sarin Gas, the Left and their media were quick to dismiss this extremely important find by using the lame excuse that these Chemical weapons Shells were produced before 1991 and hence its not effective anymore because it has much lower quality. However in March 2003 UN report about Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction there is the following on page 77 (Page 79 of the pdf file), paragraph 1 of the report http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/6mar.pdf :
The Sulfur Mustard contained in artillery shells that had been stored for over 12 years, had been found by UNMOVIC to be still of high purity. It is possible that viable filled artillery shells and aerial bombs still remain in Iraq.
FOXNews.com - Tests Confirm Sarin in Iraqi Artillery Shell - U.S. & World
Testing done by the Iraqi Survey Group (search) a U.S.-organized group of weapons inspectors who have been searching for weapons of mass destruction (search) since the ouster of Saddam Hussein concluded that the mustard gas was "stored improperly" and was thus "ineffective."
Hell, even the Bush White House admitted in 2004 that the WMDs used to justify invading Iraq were not found.
Lawmakers Cite Weapons Found in Iraq - washingtonpost.com
The U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active. Neither the military nor the White House nor the CIA considered the shells to be evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
Last night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were old and were not the suspected weapons of mass destruction sought in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
Better yet they were made invisible with a cloaking device.Two people were treated for "minor exposure" after the sarin incident but no serious injuries were reported. Soldiers transporting the shell for inspection suffered symptoms consistent with low-level chemical exposure, which is what led to the discovery, a U.S. official told Fox News.
First of all, you have the REAL WORLD exposure of people to the "WMDs" with only MINOR reactions, and secondly you have a 2004 report, from FAUX no less, that says that after tests on the mustard gas in your 2003 UN report the gas was "ineffective."
Hell, even the Bush White House admitted in 2004 that the WMDs used to justify invading Iraq were not found.
Lawmakers Cite Weapons Found in Iraq - washingtonpost.com
The U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active. Neither the military nor the White House nor the CIA considered the shells to be evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
Last night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were old and were not the suspected weapons of mass destruction sought in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
Not found doesn't mean they didn't exist.
They were looted or moved to Syria.
You mean like these morons:Yes, I've often wondered whether Tancredo could pass a literacy test. There is something wrong with that guy.. very wrong.
