To me Diane Feinstein looks like aged Tootsie.
View attachment 216472
View attachment 216474
In fact Dustin Hoffman looks quite a bit better....
of course she does, because she isn't trumpscum
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
To me Diane Feinstein looks like aged Tootsie.
View attachment 216472
View attachment 216474
In fact Dustin Hoffman looks quite a bit better....
Why should anyone take her claims at face value? If the accusations weren't credible when they happened, then why should they be allowed in the hearings?
I'm talking about Anita Hill, you stupid dingbat.Uh, no, it didn't deserve a hearing. If Hill had a complaint against Thomas she should have filed it when issue occurred.
What good would that have done? It wasn't like he was going to get fired at the time. He was like only one of three black folks working for Reagan that he couldn't tell apart.
If you take her claims at face value, yes, they should have been aired before we gave this guy a lifetime appointment to SCOTUS.
I think there was a lot of gray area. He might have made comments he thought nothing of she was overly sensitive to.
The reason I didn't take her seriously was because when he left the Dept. of Education to go to EEOC, she went with him, something most people wouldn't do with a boss they disliked, much less one that was harrassing her.
Why should anyone take her claims at face value? If the accusations weren't credible when they happened, then why should they be allowed in the hearings?
you shouldn't, nutcase. she forwarded the letter to the FBI, freak of nature.
And for a lot less than what Slick Willy did, moron.Why should anyone take her claims at face value? If the accusations weren't credible when they happened, then why should they be allowed in the hearings?
Guy get fired for a lot less than what Ms. Hill had.
And for a lot less than what Slick Willy did, moron.
According to the law, it's sexual harassment for an employer to have sex with a subordinate.And for a lot less than what Slick Willy did, moron.
Having a consensual relationship with another adult? don't think so. We'd all be in trouble if that were the case.
According to the law, it's sexual harassment for an employer to have sex with a subordinate.
Anyone who is in a position of authority is in trouble.
I don't know maybe she went with allgations of illegal activity to her grocery store clerk ike you would. Then the clerk told her to go tell some one with a law enforcement badge!Why else would she turn a desperate rumor/smear job over to the Federal B I?
She must have some internal polling numbers that suggest she about to lose to the loon that is challenging her
sad
did that sound funny in your head?I don't know maybe she went with allgations of illegal activity to her grocery store clerk ike you would. Then the clerk told her to go tell some one with a law enforcement badge!
Not as funny as sayin you have a brain!did that sound funny in your head?I don't know maybe she went with allgations of illegal activity to her grocery store clerk ike you would. Then the clerk told her to go tell some one with a law enforcement badge!
Is that really the best you can do?Not as funny as sayin you have a brain!did that sound funny in your head?I don't know maybe she went with allgations of illegal activity to her grocery store clerk ike you would. Then the clerk told her to go tell some one with a law enforcement badge!