Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That beyond fucking retarded. People make bets every single day. People often don't know if a sports team will win but they still have enough confidence to place a bet.What I find noteworthy is that there isn't a rightwinger here with confidence Trump will win.I already know you have no confidence he will win. candycorn did a masterful job exposing that.I am confident that Trump is the best choice of the candidates available.
I am not confident Trump will win.
I hope that he will.
That you find this noteworthy just shows that you are a moron.
I never claimed to be confident that he would win.
After Bill Clinton won re-election despite being a complete shit, I realized that the Best Man does not always win.
That you think this is noteworthy, just shows that you are a moron.
Speaks volumes.
Sure. It says that rightwingers aren't stupid enough to think they can predict the future based on what they hope to be true.
Unlike libs.
And such people are risking money. You lightweights are too scared to just risk having a Hillary avatar for 2 months.
Like I said.... speaks volumes. Trump doesn't stand a chance.
Nonsense. McCain sank his own campaign when he selected a ditz for a running mate who actually cited the proximity of Russia to Alaska as her foreign policy experience.Obama beat McCain in 2008 not because he he had a better record but because America grew tired of eight years of Republucan blunders
Any Democrat would have won in 2008
I disagree with this very much. I've no doubt that Clinton would have lost vs McCain in 2008. Obama is a very skilled politician and his victory was a result of his personal talent.
Nonsense. McCain sank his own campaign when he selected a ditz for a running mate who actually cited the proximity of Russia to Alaska as her foreign policy experience.
Sure, some people are like that. But then many people gamble because they have some level of confidence their wager will win.That beyond fucking retarded. People make bets every single day. People often don't know if a sports team will win but they still have enough confidence to place a bet.What I find noteworthy is that there isn't a rightwinger here with confidence Trump will win.I already know you have no confidence he will win. candycorn did a masterful job exposing that.
I never claimed to be confident that he would win.
After Bill Clinton won re-election despite being a complete shit, I realized that the Best Man does not always win.
That you think this is noteworthy, just shows that you are a moron.
Speaks volumes.
Sure. It says that rightwingers aren't stupid enough to think they can predict the future based on what they hope to be true.
Unlike libs.
And such people are risking money. You lightweights are too scared to just risk having a Hillary avatar for 2 months.
Like I said.... speaks volumes. Trump doesn't stand a chance.
Some people like to gamble. Studies show that they get their biggest jolt from LOSING.
Those people may be your role model. They are not mine.
Sure, some people are like that. But then many people gamble because they have some level of confidence their wager will win.That beyond fucking retarded. People make bets every single day. People often don't know if a sports team will win but they still have enough confidence to place a bet.What I find noteworthy is that there isn't a rightwinger here with confidence Trump will win.I never claimed to be confident that he would win.
After Bill Clinton won re-election despite being a complete shit, I realized that the Best Man does not always win.
That you think this is noteworthy, just shows that you are a moron.
Speaks volumes.
Sure. It says that rightwingers aren't stupid enough to think they can predict the future based on what they hope to be true.
Unlike libs.
And such people are risking money. You lightweights are too scared to just risk having a Hillary avatar for 2 months.
Like I said.... speaks volumes. Trump doesn't stand a chance.
Some people like to gamble. Studies show that they get their biggest jolt from LOSING.
Those people may be your role model. They are not mine.
What righties are proving here, especially in light of how trivial the stakes are, is y'all have no confidence you can win.
Bodes well for Hillary.
If she is, that also doesn't bode well for Donald Trump, who's currently behind her by double digits in almost every poll.Nonsense. McCain sank his own campaign when he selected a ditz for a running mate who actually cited the proximity of Russia to Alaska as her foreign policy experience.
Yes. But Clinton is that much of a loser.
If she is, that also doesn't bode well for Donald Trump, who's currently behind her by double digits in almost every poll.Nonsense. McCain sank his own campaign when he selected a ditz for a running mate who actually cited the proximity of Russia to Alaska as her foreign policy experience.
Yes. But Clinton is that much of a loser.
More nonsense.Sure, some people are like that. But then many people gamble because they have some level of confidence their wager will win.That beyond fucking retarded. People make bets every single day. People often don't know if a sports team will win but they still have enough confidence to place a bet.What I find noteworthy is that there isn't a rightwinger here with confidence Trump will win.
Speaks volumes.
Sure. It says that rightwingers aren't stupid enough to think they can predict the future based on what they hope to be true.
Unlike libs.
And such people are risking money. You lightweights are too scared to just risk having a Hillary avatar for 2 months.
Like I said.... speaks volumes. Trump doesn't stand a chance.
Some people like to gamble. Studies show that they get their biggest jolt from LOSING.
Those people may be your role model. They are not mine.
What righties are proving here, especially in light of how trivial the stakes are, is y'all have no confidence you can win.
Bodes well for Hillary.
Some people study various sports and believe they have become experts in predicting who will win.
I claim no special ability to predict how people will vote.
I have picked the candidate who's policies I think would be best for the nation.
What is telling is how much you leftists want to avoid that discussion.
There are threads among these fora discussing virtually every topic, plus the ability to start a thread pertaining to topics not yet discussed.
I see no states that Obama took in 2008 that McCain could have taken from Hilary. The backlash against Republicans was that strongObama beat McCain in 2008 not because he he had a better record but because America grew tired of eight years of Republucan blunders
Any Democrat would have won in 2008
I disagree with this very much. I've no doubt that Clinton would have lost vs McCain in 2008. Obama is a very skilled politician and his victory was a result of his personal talent.
I see no states that Obama took in 2008 that McCain could have taken from Hilary. The backlash against Republicans was that strongObama beat McCain in 2008 not because he he had a better record but because America grew tired of eight years of Republucan blunders
Any Democrat would have won in 2008
I disagree with this very much. I've no doubt that Clinton would have lost vs McCain in 2008. Obama is a very skilled politician and his victory was a result of his personal talent.
Then there was the Palin factor. People were afraid of her possibly being president. That fear factor will be transferred to Trump in 2016.... And then some
How could you possibly draw that conclusion?I see no states that Obama took in 2008 that McCain could have taken from Hilary. The backlash against Republicans was that strongObama beat McCain in 2008 not because he he had a better record but because America grew tired of eight years of Republucan blunders
Any Democrat would have won in 2008
I disagree with this very much. I've no doubt that Clinton would have lost vs McCain in 2008. Obama is a very skilled politician and his victory was a result of his personal talent.
Then there was the Palin factor. People were afraid of her possibly being president. That fear factor will be transferred to Trump in 2016.... And then some
So we agree that Obama sucks?
How could you possibly draw that conclusion?I see no states that Obama took in 2008 that McCain could have taken from Hilary. The backlash against Republicans was that strongObama beat McCain in 2008 not because he he had a better record but because America grew tired of eight years of Republucan blunders
Any Democrat would have won in 2008
I disagree with this very much. I've no doubt that Clinton would have lost vs McCain in 2008. Obama is a very skilled politician and his victory was a result of his personal talent.
Then there was the Palin factor. People were afraid of her possibly being president. That fear factor will be transferred to Trump in 2016.... And then some
So we agree that Obama sucks?
How could you draw that conclusion?How could you possibly draw that conclusion?I see no states that Obama took in 2008 that McCain could have taken from Hilary. The backlash against Republicans was that strongObama beat McCain in 2008 not because he he had a better record but because America grew tired of eight years of Republucan blunders
Any Democrat would have won in 2008
I disagree with this very much. I've no doubt that Clinton would have lost vs McCain in 2008. Obama is a very skilled politician and his victory was a result of his personal talent.
Then there was the Palin factor. People were afraid of her possibly being president. That fear factor will be transferred to Trump in 2016.... And then some
So we agree that Obama sucks?
Well, according to you 2008 had more to do with McCain being a loser than Obama being an alleged winner. When I tried to attribute the results to Obama being a winner, you insist on disagreeing. Based on your reasoning we must conclude that Obama sucks.
No, but what candycorn accomplished was to expose the lack in confidence some on the right in their leading candidate. Not even willing to risk putting that photo of Hillary as their avatar for two months.The stupid and lazy now outnumber the smart and productive. I have no doubt that the criminal Hillary will be POTUS.
Put another way (the correct way)
The smart and the gifted are too numerous to vote for someone like Trump.
What are you 10 years old?
What I find noteworthy is that there isn't a rightwinger here with confidence Trump will win.I already know you have no confidence he will win. candycorn did a masterful job exposing that.No, but what candycorn accomplished was to expose the lack in confidence some on the right in their leading candidate. Not even willing to risk putting that photo of Hillary as their avatar for two months.What are you 10 years old?
I am confident that Trump is the best choice of the candidates available.
I am not confident Trump will win.
I hope that he will.
That you find this noteworthy just shows that you are a moron.
I never claimed to be confident that he would win.
After Bill Clinton won re-election despite being a complete shit, I realized that the Best Man does not always win.
That you think this is noteworthy, just shows that you are a moron.
Speaks volumes.
It reflects poorly on his chances of winning. That's what.No, but what candycorn accomplished was to expose the lack in confidence some on the right in their leading candidate. Not even willing to risk putting that photo of Hillary as their avatar for two months.The stupid and lazy now outnumber the smart and productive. I have no doubt that the criminal Hillary will be POTUS.
Put another way (the correct way)
The smart and the gifted are too numerous to vote for someone like Trump.
What are you 10 years old?
We don't have confidence in him. So what?
It reflects poorly on his chances of winning. That's what.No, but what candycorn accomplished was to expose the lack in confidence some on the right in their leading candidate. Not even willing to risk putting that photo of Hillary as their avatar for two months.The stupid and lazy now outnumber the smart and productive. I have no doubt that the criminal Hillary will be POTUS.
Put another way (the correct way)
The smart and the gifted are too numerous to vote for someone like Trump.
What are you 10 years old?
We don't have confidence in him. So what?
Given how some on the right have been braying his eventual win by referring to him as "President Trump," yes, I thought some did have confidence he could win. No one here does.What I find noteworthy is that there isn't a rightwinger here with confidence Trump will win.I already know you have no confidence he will win. candycorn did a masterful job exposing that.No, but what candycorn accomplished was to expose the lack in confidence some on the right in their leading candidate. Not even willing to risk putting that photo of Hillary as their avatar for two months.
I am confident that Trump is the best choice of the candidates available.
I am not confident Trump will win.
I hope that he will.
That you find this noteworthy just shows that you are a moron.
I never claimed to be confident that he would win.
After Bill Clinton won re-election despite being a complete shit, I realized that the Best Man does not always win.
That you think this is noteworthy, just shows that you are a moron.
Speaks volumes.
Just waking up to that now?
What I'm "making out of it" is celebrating winning. And at this point, winning is what my candidate is doing.It reflects poorly on his chances of winning. That's what.No, but what candycorn accomplished was to expose the lack in confidence some on the right in their leading candidate. Not even willing to risk putting that photo of Hillary as their avatar for two months.Put another way (the correct way)
The smart and the gifted are too numerous to vote for someone like Trump.
What are you 10 years old?
We don't have confidence in him. So what?
Ummm...yeah and that's why we don't have confidence in his ability to win.
It seems like you are trying real hard to make something out of this and failing.
Given how some on the right have been braying his eventual win by referring to him as "President Trump," yes, I thought some did have confidence he could win. No one here does.What I find noteworthy is that there isn't a rightwinger here with confidence Trump will win.I already know you have no confidence he will win. candycorn did a masterful job exposing that.I am confident that Trump is the best choice of the candidates available.
I am not confident Trump will win.
I hope that he will.
That you find this noteworthy just shows that you are a moron.
I never claimed to be confident that he would win.
After Bill Clinton won re-election despite being a complete shit, I realized that the Best Man does not always win.
That you think this is noteworthy, just shows that you are a moron.
Speaks volumes.
Just waking up to that now?
