Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
- 205
It appears his mother did not have a choice for two reasons. The first is it was illegal. The second is she had a position of no abortions. She couldn't make the choice to abort because abortion was not an option.
It will send the message that if you truly celebrate family then you will join the anti-Choice crowd and imply you really don't love life or your family.
All that being said. This has to be one of the dumbest fucking protests I've seen since prohibition.
Of course it was an option - an option recommended by her doctor - but it was an option that she did not choose.
Many people balk when 'pro-choice' is equated to 'pro-abortion' and yet . . . . when a woman is pregnant there are only two options, carry the pregnancy to term or abort. 'Anti-choice crowd'? Does choice only apply if the woman opts for abortion?
How was it an option if abortions were illegal? How was it an option if she had a position of no options?
You are one stupid fuck!! She did have an option, she could have flown back to the states for the procedure, she could have opted for an illegal abortion but she opted to give birth instead.
The Incidence of Induced Abortion in the Philippines: Current Level and Recent Trends
Abortion in the Philippines: a national secret | Reuters
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/15/world/asia/15iht-phils.html