Bush92
GHBush1992
- May 23, 2014
- 34,808
- 10,703
- 1,400
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
And where did Pompeo provide evidence that this conversation was off the record?
Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
And where did Pompeo provide evidence that this conversation was off the record?
Remember, the media has far less credibility than the politicals and that is saying something about how far they have fallen.
By orders of magnitude.Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
And where did Pompeo provide evidence that this conversation was off the record?
Remember, the media has far less credibility than the politicals and that is saying something about how far they have fallen.
So you think that Kelly couldn’t tell the difference between Ukraine and Bangladesh?By orders of magnitude.Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
And where did Pompeo provide evidence that this conversation was off the record?
Remember, the media has far less credibility than the politicals and that is saying something about how far they have fallen.
Just take a look at the state of American media today. There are 13-year-old kids in the rural backwater that have more credibility than our media.
I do. Because I don't believe she knows the difference.So you think that Kelly couldn’t tell the difference between Ukraine and Bangladesh?By orders of magnitude.Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?From the article
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
And where did Pompeo provide evidence that this conversation was off the record?
Remember, the media has far less credibility than the politicals and that is saying something about how far they have fallen.
Just take a look at the state of American media today. There are 13-year-old kids in the rural backwater that have more credibility than our media.
Kelly has a masters in European studies from Harvard and has reported in the region for years.
But Pompeo is insinuating that she pointed to Bangladesh instead of Ukraine.
You believe that?
I do. Because I don't believe she knows the difference.So you think that Kelly couldn’t tell the difference between Ukraine and Bangladesh?By orders of magnitude.Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?And where did Pompeo provide evidence that this conversation was off the record?
Remember, the media has far less credibility than the politicals and that is saying something about how far they have fallen.
Just take a look at the state of American media today. There are 13-year-old kids in the rural backwater that have more credibility than our media.
Kelly has a masters in European studies from Harvard and has reported in the region for years.
But Pompeo is insinuating that she pointed to Bangladesh instead of Ukraine.
You believe that?
The bottom line is that Pompeo said that America doesn't care about Ukraine, and he is right.
He said it in an off the record comment. She violated that.
She set up the meeting for a single topic. She violated that.
What is there to say about her credibility or even honesty?
Sorry, she is the one who holds the bottom position in this.
From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
I can point out 97% of any country in this world.I do. Because I don't believe she knows the difference.So you think that Kelly couldn’t tell the difference between Ukraine and Bangladesh?By orders of magnitude.Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?
Remember, the media has far less credibility than the politicals and that is saying something about how far they have fallen.
Just take a look at the state of American media today. There are 13-year-old kids in the rural backwater that have more credibility than our media.
Kelly has a masters in European studies from Harvard and has reported in the region for years.
But Pompeo is insinuating that she pointed to Bangladesh instead of Ukraine.
You believe that?
The bottom line is that Pompeo said that America doesn't care about Ukraine, and he is right.
He said it in an off the record comment. She violated that.
She set up the meeting for a single topic. She violated that.
What is there to say about her credibility or even honesty?
Sorry, she is the one who holds the bottom position in this.
Go on. I’ve always found Kelly to be honest. If you want to attack her credibility, give a good reason.
You have any idea where Bangladesh is? There is zero chance in hell anyone of Kelly’s background would make that mistake.
I do. Because I don't believe she knows the difference.So you think that Kelly couldn’t tell the difference between Ukraine and Bangladesh?By orders of magnitude.Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?He wasn't the one whining about the interview. Where has the reporter provided proof of anything but her word?
Remember, the media has far less credibility than the politicals and that is saying something about how far they have fallen.
Just take a look at the state of American media today. There are 13-year-old kids in the rural backwater that have more credibility than our media.
Kelly has a masters in European studies from Harvard and has reported in the region for years.
But Pompeo is insinuating that she pointed to Bangladesh instead of Ukraine.
You believe that?
The bottom line is that Pompeo said that America doesn't care about Ukraine, and he is right.
He said it in an off the record comment. She violated that.
She set up the meeting for a single topic. She violated that.
What is there to say about her credibility or even honesty?
Sorry, she is the one who holds the bottom position in this.
Go on. I’ve always found Kelly to be honest. If you want to attack her credibility, give a good reason.
You have any idea where Bangladesh is? There is zero chance in hell anyone of Kelly’s background would make that mistake.
Of course, I did. But when it came to be known that she violated two tenants of journalism, it became pretty clear who is lying.From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
Unless of course it is Pompeo that is lying...but I know that would never ever enter your tiny little mind
I can point out 97% of any country in this world.I do. Because I don't believe she knows the difference.So you think that Kelly couldn’t tell the difference between Ukraine and Bangladesh?By orders of magnitude.Uh, yes. He most definitely is whining about the interview. You think Pompeo has more credibility than Kelly?
Just take a look at the state of American media today. There are 13-year-old kids in the rural backwater that have more credibility than our media.
Kelly has a masters in European studies from Harvard and has reported in the region for years.
But Pompeo is insinuating that she pointed to Bangladesh instead of Ukraine.
You believe that?
The bottom line is that Pompeo said that America doesn't care about Ukraine, and he is right.
He said it in an off the record comment. She violated that.
She set up the meeting for a single topic. She violated that.
What is there to say about her credibility or even honesty?
Sorry, she is the one who holds the bottom position in this.
Go on. I’ve always found Kelly to be honest. If you want to attack her credibility, give a good reason.
You have any idea where Bangladesh is? There is zero chance in hell anyone of Kelly’s background would make that mistake.
I gave you reason why I attack her credibility.
Someone so dishonest as to violate two tenants of responsible journalism has no credibility.
Of course, I did. But when it came to be known that she violated two tenants of journalism, it became pretty clear who is lying.From the articleCan anyone tell me what was so unreasonable about her questions?
“NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly lied to me, twice,” Pompeo said in the statement. “First, last month, in setting up our interview and, then again yesterday, in agreeing to have our post-interview conversation off the record. It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency.”
Unless you think that lying and breaking your word is an okay thing to do.
Unless of course it is Pompeo that is lying...but I know that would never ever enter your tiny little mind
But of course, you would take the position that anyone in the Trump administration is lying because.....well, Trump.
And a host of others who has said that the deal was she was to talk about Iran and that his comments about Ukraine were off the record.I can point out 97% of any country in this world.I do. Because I don't believe she knows the difference.So you think that Kelly couldn’t tell the difference between Ukraine and Bangladesh?By orders of magnitude.
Just take a look at the state of American media today. There are 13-year-old kids in the rural backwater that have more credibility than our media.
Kelly has a masters in European studies from Harvard and has reported in the region for years.
But Pompeo is insinuating that she pointed to Bangladesh instead of Ukraine.
You believe that?
The bottom line is that Pompeo said that America doesn't care about Ukraine, and he is right.
He said it in an off the record comment. She violated that.
She set up the meeting for a single topic. She violated that.
What is there to say about her credibility or even honesty?
Sorry, she is the one who holds the bottom position in this.
Go on. I’ve always found Kelly to be honest. If you want to attack her credibility, give a good reason.
You have any idea where Bangladesh is? There is zero chance in hell anyone of Kelly’s background would make that mistake.
I gave you reason why I attack her credibility.
Someone so dishonest as to violate two tenants of responsible journalism has no credibility.
You do not know that she violated two tenants of responsible journalism, all you have is Pompeo's word and he lied about her not knowing where the Ukraine is.